Israel and USA 'jammed GPS signals' in days before Iran's 300-missile launch to confuse attackers


GPS signals will most cases be blocked by USA in the case of War.

He had own experience during kargil war, it's the reason military now moved from GPS dependency mostly
 
Last edited:


CWQ2.gif


BBC? Western Media a source of information that is true?


4e.gif


Might as well relied on what that caricature below tells you

images


images
 
Last edited:
GPS signals will most cases will be blocked by USA in the case of War.

He had own experience during kargil war, it's the reason military now moved from GPS dependency mostly
I believe that any weapon utilizing a GPS system can be remotely disabled by the creators of GPS technology, particularly if it is perceived as a threat to Western powers. The developers of GPS programs possess the capability to manipulate files swiftly and effectively. Furthermore, GPS systems can provide precise, real-time location information for these weapons.

Recent events involving Israel and the USA highlight the utilization of GPS technology to ascertain the exact location of hostile weapons. However, the decision to publicly disclose this capability to the mainstream media may have been ill-advised. By doing so, they inadvertently revealed a potential weakness in their defense strategy.

Israeli and USA GPS developers have implemented geographical boundaries around their assets, triggering alerts within the system when hostile weapons approach these boundaries. This mechanism operates similarly to how live location sharing works on WhatsApp. Just as friends can track each other's movements and estimated arrival times, GPS systems can detect and pinpoint the location of incoming threats.

In essence, the revelation of this capability underscores the delicate balance between maintaining strategic advantage and inadvertently disclosing vulnerabilities. It serves as a cautionary tale for nations relying heavily on GPS technology in modern warfare.
 
Recent events involving Israel and the USA highlight the utilization of GPS technology to ascertain the exact location of hostile weapons.

How exactly did they do that?

A GPS satellite has no clue who is listening to it: the GPS receiver collects signals from multiple (3) satellites and calculates its position without talking back to any satellite.
 
How exactly did they do that?

A GPS satellite has no clue who is listening to it: the GPS receiver collects signals from multiple (3) satellites and calculates its position without talking back to any satellite.
I am trying to simplifies the concept of creating geographical boundaries around specific locations to trigger alerts. Here's a more technical breakdown:

GPS satellites orbiting Earth continuously broadcast signals containing time and location information. GPS receivers, such as those in smartphones or military equipment, passively receive these signals and use the information to calculate their precise location through a process called trilateration, which involves measuring the time it takes for signals from multiple satellites to reach the receiver.

Now, when it comes to creating geographical boundaries, it involves programming GPS receivers to recognize certain predefined areas as sensitive or protected zones. This programming is typically done through software updates or configurations.

When a GPS receiver enters or approaches one of these predefined boundaries, it triggers alerts or specific actions programmed into the device. These alerts can be customized based on the requirements, such as notifying the user, transmitting data to a central command center, or activating defensive measures.

In the context of military defense, countries like Israel and the USA have likely implemented sophisticated GPS-based systems to protect their assets, such as military bases or strategic installations. By creating these geographical boundaries around such locations, they can detect and respond to potential threats more effectively.

In summary, the process involves programming GPS receivers to recognize specific geographic areas as sensitive zones and trigger predefined actions when those boundaries are breached. This allows for enhanced security and protection of critical assets.
 
I am trying to simplifies the concept of creating geographical boundaries around specific locations to trigger alerts. Here's a more technical breakdown:

GPS satellites orbiting Earth continuously broadcast signals containing time and location information. GPS receivers, such as those in smartphones or military equipment, passively receive these signals and use the information to calculate their precise location through a process called trilateration, which involves measuring the time it takes for signals from multiple satellites to reach the receiver.

Now, when it comes to creating geographical boundaries, it involves programming GPS receivers to recognize certain predefined areas as sensitive or protected zones. This programming is typically done through software updates or configurations.

When a GPS receiver enters or approaches one of these predefined boundaries, it triggers alerts or specific actions programmed into the device. These alerts can be customized based on the requirements, such as notifying the user, transmitting data to a central command center, or activating defensive measures.

In the context of military defense, countries like Israel and the USA have likely implemented sophisticated GPS-based systems to protect their assets, such as military bases or strategic installations. By creating these geographical boundaries around such locations, they can detect and respond to potential threats more effectively.

In summary, the process involves programming GPS receivers to recognize specific geographic areas as sensitive zones and trigger predefined actions when those boundaries are breached. This allows for enhanced security and protection of critical assets.

LOL, I know very well how GPS technology works.

I was challenging your claim that Israel and US have used GPS technology to locate 'hostile weapons'.
 
LOL, I know very well how GPS technology works.

I was challenging your claim that Israel and US have used GPS technology to locate 'hostile weapons'.
It's understandable that there may be skepticism surrounding my claims about the specific use of GPS technology to locate hostile weapons. While GPS technology itself doesn't inherently "locate" weapons, it plays a crucial role in providing precise location data that can aid in various military operations and defense strategies.

In the context of military defense, countries like Israel and the USA utilize GPS technology as part of broader systems designed to detect, track, and respond to potential threats, including hostile weapons. While the exact methods and capabilities of these systems may not be publicly disclosed, it's well-documented that GPS technology contributes to enhancing situational awareness and precision targeting in military operations.

Moreover, the concept of creating geographical boundaries around sensitive assets, as discussed earlier, is a plausible application of GPS technology to enhance security measures. By programming GPS receivers to recognize specific geographic areas and trigger alerts or defensive actions when breached, countries can better protect critical infrastructure and assets.

While the specifics of how Israel and the USA leverage GPS technology in defense operations may not be publicly disclosed, it's reasonable to assume that they utilize its capabilities to bolster their military capabilities and safeguard national security interests. Ultimately, the role of GPS technology in military defense underscores its significance in modern warfare and strategic defense planning.
The Iron Dome system, used by Israel for missile defense, relies on various data inputs, including GPS readings, to effectively detect, track, and intercept incoming threats. By integrating GPS data with other sensor information and utilizing advanced algorithms, the Iron Dome system can accurately calculate the trajectory of incoming missiles and determine the optimal interception path.

The GPS data provides crucial location information, allowing the Iron Dome system to accurately predict the trajectory and impact point of incoming projectiles. This data, combined with other sensor inputs such as radar and infrared detection, enables the system to make rapid decisions about launching interceptors to neutralize the threat.

The creation of programs and algorithms to process and analyze GPS data is indeed a fundamental aspect of developing advanced defense systems like the Iron Dome. These algorithms are designed to handle large volumes of data in real-time, identify potential threats, and execute appropriate response actions efficiently.

In summary, the integration of GPS technology, along with sophisticated algorithms, plays a vital role in the effectiveness of defense systems like the Iron Dome. By leveraging GPS data and advanced computational techniques, these systems can provide enhanced protection against incoming threats and contribute to overall national security.
 
It's understandable that there may be skepticism surrounding my claims about the specific use of GPS technology to locate hostile weapons. While GPS technology itself doesn't inherently "locate" weapons, it plays a crucial role in providing precise location data that can aid in various military operations and defense strategies.

In the context of military defense, countries like Israel and the USA utilize GPS technology as part of broader systems designed to detect, track, and respond to potential threats, including hostile weapons. While the exact methods and capabilities of these systems may not be publicly disclosed, it's well-documented that GPS technology contributes to enhancing situational awareness and precision targeting in military operations.

Moreover, the concept of creating geographical boundaries around sensitive assets, as discussed earlier, is a plausible application of GPS technology to enhance security measures. By programming GPS receivers to recognize specific geographic areas and trigger alerts or defensive actions when breached, countries can better protect critical infrastructure and assets.

While the specifics of how Israel and the USA leverage GPS technology in defense operations may not be publicly disclosed, it's reasonable to assume that they utilize its capabilities to bolster their military capabilities and safeguard national security interests. Ultimately, the role of GPS technology in military defense underscores its significance in modern warfare and strategic defense planning.
The Iron Dome system, used by Israel for missile defense, relies on various data inputs, including GPS readings, to effectively detect, track, and intercept incoming threats. By integrating GPS data with other sensor information and utilizing advanced algorithms, the Iron Dome system can accurately calculate the trajectory of incoming missiles and determine the optimal interception path.

The GPS data provides crucial location information, allowing the Iron Dome system to accurately predict the trajectory and impact point of incoming projectiles. This data, combined with other sensor inputs such as radar and infrared detection, enables the system to make rapid decisions about launching interceptors to neutralize the threat.

The creation of programs and algorithms to process and analyze GPS data is indeed a fundamental aspect of developing advanced defense systems like the Iron Dome. These algorithms are designed to handle large volumes of data in real-time, identify potential threats, and execute appropriate response actions efficiently.

In summary, the integration of GPS technology, along with sophisticated algorithms, plays a vital role in the effectiveness of defense systems like the Iron Dome. By leveraging GPS data and advanced computational techniques, these systems can provide enhanced protection against incoming threats and contribute to overall national security.
You are just having a wild imaginations and guesses with no base buddy
 
It's understandable that there may be skepticism surrounding my claims about the specific use of GPS technology to locate hostile weapons. While GPS technology itself doesn't inherently "locate" weapons, it plays a crucial role in providing precise location data that can aid in various military operations and defense strategies.

In the context of military defense, countries like Israel and the USA utilize GPS technology as part of broader systems designed to detect, track, and respond to potential threats, including hostile weapons. While the exact methods and capabilities of these systems may not be publicly disclosed, it's well-documented that GPS technology contributes to enhancing situational awareness and precision targeting in military operations.

Moreover, the concept of creating geographical boundaries around sensitive assets, as discussed earlier, is a plausible application of GPS technology to enhance security measures. By programming GPS receivers to recognize specific geographic areas and trigger alerts or defensive actions when breached, countries can better protect critical infrastructure and assets.

While the specifics of how Israel and the USA leverage GPS technology in defense operations may not be publicly disclosed, it's reasonable to assume that they utilize its capabilities to bolster their military capabilities and safeguard national security interests. Ultimately, the role of GPS technology in military defense underscores its significance in modern warfare and strategic defense planning.
The Iron Dome system, used by Israel for missile defense, relies on various data inputs, including GPS readings, to effectively detect, track, and intercept incoming threats. By integrating GPS data with other sensor information and utilizing advanced algorithms, the Iron Dome system can accurately calculate the trajectory of incoming missiles and determine the optimal interception path.

The GPS data provides crucial location information, allowing the Iron Dome system to accurately predict the trajectory and impact point of incoming projectiles. This data, combined with other sensor inputs such as radar and infrared detection, enables the system to make rapid decisions about launching interceptors to neutralize the threat.

The creation of programs and algorithms to process and analyze GPS data is indeed a fundamental aspect of developing advanced defense systems like the Iron Dome. These algorithms are designed to handle large volumes of data in real-time, identify potential threats, and execute appropriate response actions efficiently.

In summary, the integration of GPS technology, along with sophisticated algorithms, plays a vital role in the effectiveness of defense systems like the Iron Dome. By leveraging GPS data and advanced computational techniques, these systems can provide enhanced protection against incoming threats and contribute to overall national security.

Please understand this simple fact.

A GPS receiver tells you YOUR location. It does not tell you the location of another GPS receiver, friendly, hostile or imaginary.

A GPS receiver is literally a radio. When you are listening to a radio station, you have no idea who else is listening to the same radio station.
 
Please understand this simple fact.

A GPS receiver tells you YOUR location. It does not tell you the location of another GPS receiver, friendly, hostile or imaginary.

A GPS receiver is literally a radio. When you are listening to a radio station, you have no idea who else is listening to the same radio station.
What I am saying nothing is impossible. It is like no one thought 200 years ago that we will have electricity aeroplanes, jet fighters, Internet computers cars mobiles we humen are doing phenomenal things. Anyway I have given inside info on that. Some good backhand developers can change things in mater of no time as we are in world of science and development…
 
I believe that any weapon utilizing a GPS system can be remotely disabled by the creators of GPS technology,

GPS is owned by the US military and it has stated from Day 1 that it reserves the right to do whatever it wants with the signals. This is no mystery.
 
Last edited:
A GPS receiver is literally a radio. When you are listening to a radio station, you have no idea who else is listening to the same radio station.

Correct..a GPS receiver is just a radio that measures signal strength of multiple radio channel transmission locations and attempts to do a triangulation of your location based on that.

It's like being in car and trying to tune between 3 radio stations. Depending upon the reception of each you can make an estimation of where you are.
 
Last edited:
Why are you posting it here?
Why I posted good question. I am writing to express my concern regarding recent decisions that seem to compromise Pakistan's security under the new leadership. One significant decision involved transitioning from GPS to China's BeiDou satellite navigation system, which was underway until a halt was initiated under the leadership of Asim Munir and the Air Chief.

The grounding of the SZK 03 Chinese surveillance airplanes, which were acquired between 2001 and 2005, further raises questions about the strategic direction being taken. These aircraft were integral to Pakistan's surveillance capabilities and played a crucial role in safeguarding national security interests.

The timing of these decisions is particularly alarming, considering the events surrounding the surprise airstrike conducted by Pakistan on February 27th, utilizing China's BeiDou system. This successful operation showcased the effectiveness of the BeiDou system in enhancing Pakistan's defense capabilities.

However, the abrupt halt in the transition process and the grounding of the surveillance aircraft raise concerns about the motivations behind these actions. It is widely known that the USA had allegedly informed India about Pakistan's plan to launch 18 missiles, suggesting a potential leak of sensitive information.

These developments highlight the need for transparency and accountability in decision-making processes that impact national security. As citizens, we must demand clarity and justification for decisions that could potentially undermine Pakistan's defense capabilities and jeopardize its sovereignty.

In conclusion, it is imperative that the Pakistani leadership prioritize national security interests above all else and ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of the country and its people. We must remain vigilant and hold our leaders accountable for their actions to safeguard the future of Pakistan.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top