Trump did not push back on Burnham’s Israel sanctions
Henry Bodkin, Dominic Penna, Connor Stringer
US president ‘did not ask PM to change course’ on trade restrictions on West Bank settlements
Henry Bodkin Jerusalem Correspondent. Dominic Penna Senior Political Correspondent. Connor Stringer Chief Washington Correspondent
Donald Trump did not attempt to dissuade Andy Burnham from imposing sanctions on West Bank settlements, it has been reported.
The Prime Minister called the US president to inform him of the new trade restrictions on Israeli settlers before Tuesday’s announcement by Ed Miliband, the Foreign Secretary.
But Mr Trump “did not push back or ask Mr Burnham to change course”, American news outlet Axios reported.
A similar account was reported by the Times of Israel.
Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, also refused to condemn the UK’s action, even saying that the US and UK shared the same goals over violence in the West Bank.
For weeks, Israeli officials and some independent experts had said the US would punish Britain if it imposed trade sanctions on the settlements.
On Monday, Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel and a strong supporter of the settlement project, warned that “without a doubt”, the US would react to the measure.
However, on Tuesday, Mr Rubio pointed out that “the president has not commented on this”.
Britain’s new sanctions were coordinated with France and Canada and received public endorsement from nine other European countries.
In his announcement, Mr Miliband said settlers were “terrorists” who were carrying out “ethnic cleansing”.
Israel dismissed the “outrageous lie” and ordered the closure of Britain’s consulate in East Jerusalem, expelled other diplomats and banned 11 Left-wing MPs, including Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott, from entering the country.
The sanctions and resulting countermeasures have brought UK-Israel relations to their lowest point since the birth of the Jewish state.
Mr Trump’s refusal to condemn Britain is the latest sign of his acrimonious relations with Benjamin Netanyahu.
The pair have previously disagreed over strategies for the Iran war and the peace process in Gaza.
Moreover, the US has criticised settler violence in the West Bank and told Israel it should not formally annex the occupied territory, as this would alienate the US’s Arab and Muslim allies in the region.
Mr Rubio said: “We were made aware that they [UK] were going to make this decision.
“We heard their arguments as to why. Look, we share the goal of stability. We don’t want to see some uptick in violence or uptick in tensions in the West Bank at a very tenuous time in the region.”
Recommended
Hugh Lovatt, an Israel-Palestine expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said the lack of US reaction “shows that the warnings of US retaliation that came from the supporters of Israel and its settlements were largely baseless and manufactured to deter yesterday’s move by the British Government”.
He added that the silence was also likely to have reflected a “lack of coherent US policy towards the West Bank, which it continues largely to prioritise”.
Mr Lovatt said: “The fact that the UK was joined by Canada as well as France and other European countries may also indicate a broader malaise with the US transatlantic relationship and a greater willingness to collectively work around Washington on key issues.”
On Wednesday, a US Congresswoman urged Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, to add the UK to the Treasury’s blacklist over its sanctions against Israel.
Representative Claudia Tenney asked Mr Bessent to investigate whether Andy Burnham’s new trade restrictions on Israeli settlers amount to participation in an unsanctioned “international boycott”.
“Under this law, the Treasury Department is required to maintain a list of countries that condition commercial participation on compliance with an unsanctioned international boycott. Inclusion on this list imposes specific tax reporting requirements and potential penalties for US individuals and businesses engaged in certain activities in those countries,” she wrote.
“The United States must send a clear signal that efforts to economically isolate Israel will carry consequences, and that US law designed to combat such discrimination will be enforced,” Ms Tenney added.
‘A dark day for British Jews’
The sanctions include an import ban on all goods produced in Israeli settlements in the West Bank and an embargo on arms exports that “materially” support them.
In his announcement, Mr Miliband became the first British minister to accuse Israeli settlers of ethnic cleansing, in a hardening of the UK’s diplomatic position towards the country.
The Chief Rabbi warned that the new measures were “truly a dark day” that would harm British Jews.
Sir Ephraim Mirvis condemned the Foreign Secretary for implementing trade restrictions and accused him of fuelling “mendacious anti-Israel rhetoric” that would put Jewish people in danger.
On Wednesday, Mr Miliband told Sky News: “I’m a proud British Jew and I don’t agree with the Chief Rabbi. I have great respect for the Chief Rabbi, but I don’t agree with him.”
He added: “I believe that it must be possible to do what we did yesterday, which is to stand up for British values, for the rule of law, of dignity of people, of the prevention of injustice.
“And [we should] do so in a way, as I did yesterday, to say to anyone in our country who holds British Jews responsible for the actions of the Israeli government, that is anti-Semitism, pure and simple. But I believe we can do that and stand up for British values.”
Mr Miliband insisted that the sanctions were the only way to safeguard the prospect of a two-state solution in which a secure Israel could co-exist with a viable Palestinian state.
He continued: “I regret what the Israeli government has announced, but I’m proud of what we did yesterday and it was the right thing to do.”
Mr Miliband added: “It will be damaging, that is true. But we weighed up the costs and benefits in advance of this.
“I would have preferred that Israel wouldn’t have announced what it did, but overall, I strongly believe that what we did along with other international allies was absolutely the right thing to do.”
The sanctions were triggered in part by Israel inviting tenders to build a large new settlement to the east of Jerusalem called E1, which threatens to cut the Palestinian urban heartland of the West Bank in half.
However, Labour has been accused of using the E1 proposals as a pretext for sanctions that it had intended to impose anyway after years of domestic pressure to adopt a tougher stance on Israel.
Mr Burnham used one of his first foreign policy pronouncements since returning to Westminster to apologise to Labour members for his party’s record on the issue.
Sir Keir Starmer, his predecessor, spent months resisting pressure to demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza after the attacks on Oct 7, 2023, in which Hamas murdered 1,200 Israelis, triggering the conflict in Gaza.
Mr Burnham, then the mayor of Greater Manchester, joined other local Labour leaders in demanding an end to hostilities three weeks after the massacre.
Labour subsequently lost a significant amount of support at the ballot box from Muslim and hard-Left voters, with five independent MPs elected at the last national poll on a pro-Palestinian ticket at the general election in 2024.
The Jewish Leadership Council, one of the UK’s leading Jewish organisations, accused Labour of sanctioning Israel to appease Islamist extremists, while the Board of Deputies of British Jews warned that the sanctions risked further inflaming community tensions.