Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present

[TheChooChooTrain]

So Netanyahu gave a speech at the UN in New York, then came home and ordered a strike on Nasrallah.

 

[BananaRepublic]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Zionists are desperately trying to get Iran involved but Iran won’t join the war until they have some nuclear bombs and an airforce. That’s about a decade away.

Israeli attacks on Lebanon is tricky - it cannot go on endlessly - because it will soon start affecting the Christians as Muslims take shelter in safer Christians areas.

Israel cannot pen the Muslims in like they have done in Gaza.

Therefore, Israel will have to soon decide whether to invade Lebanon or start directly shelling Iran.

Anyway, Muslims now have clear blueprint and ready made euphemisms when the time comes to pound the Zionists.

 

[Persian Gulf]

Let's see.

I certainly don't trust "Israel Radar" propaganda account

 

[BHAN85]

Apparently, you don't know how emperors think. We Chinese, given a long string of emperors we had, do.

To understand USA behavior you must think like a twisted jew.

Read Ancient Jewish books about Babylon of Jewish captivity, Isaiah and Jeremiah Jewish prophets books.

And you'll see a lot of parallelism to current USA.

Because current USA is ruled by Jewish people elite.

Cold, rational people.

And do the same things, in a different escale.

Bible Gateway passage: Isaiah 47:10 - American Standard Version

For thou hast trusted in thy wickedness; thou hast said, None seeth me; thy wisdom and thy knowledge, it hath perverted thee, and thou hast said in thy heart, I am, and there is none else besides me.

www.biblegateway.com

 

[TheChooChooTrain]

Let's see.

yeah, Hamas had a hard time accepting that Mohommad Deif was dead. But then again, Nasrallah could be chilling in Iran right now.

 

[Falcon29]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Beast89]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

its Judaism, such acts can't be put down to political ideology.

 

[Solomon2]

What is UN resolution 1701 that some hope could help end Israel-Hezbollah conflict?​

by Naharnet Newsdesk 6 hours ago

In 2006, after a bruising monthlong war between Israel and Lebanon's powerful Hezbollah, the United Nations Security Council unanimously voted for a resolution to end the conflict and pave the way for lasting security along the border.

But while there was relative calm for nearly two decades, Resolution 1701's terms were never fully enforced.

And now, after nearly a year of low-level clashes, Israel and Hezbollah appear on the verge of another all-out war. As Israeli jets pound deep inside Lebanon and Hezbollah fires rockets deeper into northern Israel, U.N. and diplomatic officials have again turned to the 2006 resolution in a bid to end the conflict.

Years of deeply divided politics and regionwide geopolitical hostilities have halted substantial progress on its implementation, yet Resolution 1701 is still considered the brightest prospect for long-term stability between Israel and Lebanon.

What is UNSC Resolution 1701? [link to text of 1701]

In 2000, Israel withdrew its forces from most of southern Lebanon along a U.N.-demarcated "Blue Line" that separated the two countries and the annexed Golan Heights. U.N. peacekeeping forces in Lebanon, known as UNIFIL, increased their presence along the line of withdrawal.

Resolution 1701 was supposed to finish the incomplete work from 2000 and end the 2006 war; Israeli forces would fully withdraw while the Lebanese army and UNIFIL — Hezbollah excluded — would be the exclusive armed presence south of Lebanon's Litani River.

The Lebanese state was to have full sovereignty over its south.

Meanwhile, up to 15,000 U.N. peacekeepers would help to maintain calm, return displaced Lebanese and secure the area alongside the Lebanese group.

The goal was long-term security, with land borders eventually demarcated to resolve territorial disputes.

"It was made for a certain situation and context," Elias Hanna, a retired Lebanese army general, told The Associated Press. "But as time goes on, the essence of the resolution begins to hollow."

Has it been implemented?

For years, Lebanon and Israel blamed each other for countless violations along the tense frontier. Israel says Hezbollah's elite Radwan Force and growing arsenal remain, and accuses the group of using a local environmental organization to spy on troops. Lebanon complains about military jets and naval ships entering Lebanese territory even when there is no active conflict. [S2: under Clause 15 of 1701 foreign aircraft and ships are authorized to undertake these incursions to prevent rearmament of non-Lebanon-government and non-UNIFIL forces.]

"You had a role of the UNIFIL that slowly eroded like any other peacekeeping with time that has no clear mandate," said Joseph Bahout, the director of the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy at the American University of Beirut. "They don't have permission to inspect the area without coordinating with the Lebanese army."

UNIFIL for years has urged Israel to withdraw from some territory north of the frontier, but to no avail. [S2: probably a reference to the village of Ghajar, bordering Syria, Lebanon, and Israel, which was controlled by Syria, not Lebanon, before the 1967 Six-Day War when Syria lost it to Israel. The U.N. wanted to divide it between Israel and Lebanon after the 2006 war, over the objection of the residents. More: link]

Hezbollah's power has meanwhile grown, both in its arsenal and as a political influence in parliament.

The Iran-backed group was essential in keeping Syrian President Bashar Assad in power when armed opposition groups tried to topple him, and it supports Iran-backed groups in Iraq and Yemen. It has an estimated 150,000 rockets and missiles, including precision-guided missiles pointed at Israel, and has introduced drones into its arsenal.

Hanna says Hezbollah "is something never seen before as a non-state actor" with political and military influence.

How relevant is 1701 to ending the current hostilities?

Efforts led by the U.S. and France for a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah have underscored that they still view the resolution as key. For almost a year, Washington has promoted various versions of a deal that would gradually lead to its full implementation.

But the circumstances now are far more complicated than in 2006.

Israel says its aerial bombardments aim to push Hezbollah back and allow its northern residents to return home safely. Hezbollah says it will stop firing rockets only once there is a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. Negotiations for a ceasefire there are gridlocked.

"You're tying 1701 with a hundred things," Bahout said. "A resolution is the reflection of a balance of power and political context."

So while the Security Council resolution's goals are still relevant, new issues have emerged that have sidelined its implementation.

"Between the warring parties, you have to make each party feel that they achieved something," Hanna said. "Otherwise, you won't come to the table unless you are defeated or annihilated."

 

[Sarhang]

It all depends if Nasrallah was in the location targeted by IDF. If he was, he is dead. If not, he got lucky.

 

[TheChooChooTrain]

Either way, if neither Iran nor Hezbollah 'declares war' on Israel after this. We know both of them have already lost.

 

[Persian Gulf]

It all depends if Nasrallah was in the location targeted by IDF. If he was, he is dead. If not, he got lucky.

if not, it shows failure of Israeli intelligence or that their intention was just to commit mass slaughter. which one ?

 

[Falcon29]

yeah, Hamas had a hard time accepting that Mohommad Deif was dead. But then again, Nasrallah could be chilling in Iran right now.

Mohammed Deif is not dead and was never targeted. It was purely a massacre of civilians.

 

[Solomon2]

Israelis won't be slain en masse if they learn to live as part of the region and treat Palestinians as equal-

Well, now you're just engaged in wishful thinking. The kind where if you're wrong millions will suffer without any skin off your nose, right? Not a good basis for decision-making, is it?

 

[TheChooChooTrain]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Sarhang]

if not, it shows failure of Israeli intelligence or that their intention was just to commit mass slaughter. which one ?

100 Lebanese citizens killed or 1 Nasrallah. Which one is more valuable for Israel?