Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present
- Thread starter Ali_Baba
- Start date
- Status
UKBengali
Elite Member
These turds are so delusional that they think they can go to another country and demand what is acceptable and what is not.
Davey Crockett
Elite Member
Hassan Al-Somal
Elite Member
"Every day Israel commits more than one massacre, and every day a massacre is more horrific than the one before it.
How long?"
lightning f57
Trusted Member
This Israeli genocide tracker shows the Israeli version of ISIS. How can the west condemn ISIS on one hand and turn a blind eye to their jewish equivalents.
Muslims left many countries to be part of the islamic state is no different to this situation, if anything the Israeli are much worse.
Muslims left many countries to be part of the islamic state is no different to this situation, if anything the Israeli are much worse.
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
These westerners themselves are terrorists.
muhammed45
Elite Member
ISIS was a product of western and Israeli intelligence and their slave governments in this region.
Al-Baghdadi was trained in Israel and USA, till he turned into deadwood. There is an Al-Baghdadi military base in Israel. Go figure
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #54,278
At this point, you can be sure that the following items are correct.
1 - All of the social media providers have been given clear legal hold on all social media posts originating from Israel, Lebanon, Palestine to not delete any posts from their systems, but make them look like they are 'deleted' only.
2 - All the accounts they want to track, are being tracked.
3 - Countries like South Africia that are pursing the genocide case are working with companies, software providers who are "sucking in every social media post" in a manner that allow them to reference those social media accounts for prosecution in war crimes, and the crimes of genocide.
4 - anyone in that region can "delete" their "social media" but all data, publications are safetly backed up for use in any legal prosecutions.
Take note of how there are social media analysers who can collate, aggregate statistics on trends and provide that as a service( there have been some examples of how this is being used to manipulate elections posted in this forum already ! )
No social media company wants to be in the position that they are legally asked to provide specific information in the pursuit of a legal case of genocide and warcrimes and not be able to. That will look very bad for them..
Last edited:
Meengla
Elite Member
I have been following the Israeli sites for many months and this article on a main Israeli site is not surprising at all and sums up the general, overwhelming preference for Trump and a fear of Harris Presidency. As I said before, the Democratic Party is on an irreversible path of alienation from Israel. The change is slow but sure.
www.jpost.com
Whatever happens on Tuesday and whoever wins the US election, expect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to waste no time in leveraging the vote’s outcome to steer Israeli policy – to secure a deal for the hostages and to end the war in Lebanon.
If Donald Trump wins, Netanyahu will seize the opportunity to convince his coalition’s right-wing partners – particularly Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir – that concluding the conflict is essential to keep the incoming administration aligned with Israeli interests.
Netanyahu will argue that Trump has asked for the war to end by January 20, the date of his inauguration.
He might even hint at Trump’s support for future West Bank annexation as a possibility, asserting that ending the war now could pave the way to the realization of the Right’s dream.
Conversely, if Kamala Harris claims the White House, Netanyahu will play a different hand entirely, painting a darker picture of what a Democratic administration could bring.
He will tell his right-wing allies that failing to end the Gaza war before Harris takes office risks inviting an American crackdown on the settlements in the West Bank – potentially even worse than the hardline policies of Barack Obama.
He would remind them of Obama’s “not a single brick” instruction during their first meeting, an encounter that Netanyahu later described as an “ambush” and which pressured Israel into a 10-month settlement freeze.
This time, he’ll insist, the stakes could be even higher. Ending the war before January, Netanyahu will argue, will be necessary to avoid American measures that could go so far as to undermine the IDF’s ability to even prosecute the wars that Smotrich and Ben-Gvir will want to see continue.
As a result, the most pressing deadline right now is not the fate of the hostages but the fate of America and who will be the next president.
That is what is driving the sudden change on both fronts: Lebanon, where on Thursday both Israelis and Lebanese were hinting that a deal was imminent and Gaza, where a hostage deal – albeit small in scope – might also be just days away.
Looming over all of this is the unpredictability of the American political transition. The period between the US election and the presidential inauguration has often proven volatile for Israeli-American relations.
During this time – when the outgoing president is free of political constraints and campaign commitments – Israel needs to be cautious.
It was during this transition period in 2016 that Obama allowed the UN Security Council to pass Resolution 2334, which condemned Israeli settlements and demanded their cessation.
While Israel saw the American abstention as a betrayal, there is concern now that President Joe Biden would allow a similar resolution to pass – perhaps this time even one that advocates for the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Such a resolution would be more likely if Trump wins. If Harris wins, Biden may hold back to avoid binding her administration’s hand.
How will the US election determine Israel's future in war? | The Jerusalem Post
The result of the US election stands to redefine Israel’s war options. Netanyahu might be adept at navigating such diplomatic challenges, but he knows that this period calls for caution.
www.jpost.com
Whatever happens on Tuesday and whoever wins the US election, expect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to waste no time in leveraging the vote’s outcome to steer Israeli policy – to secure a deal for the hostages and to end the war in Lebanon.
If Donald Trump wins, Netanyahu will seize the opportunity to convince his coalition’s right-wing partners – particularly Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir – that concluding the conflict is essential to keep the incoming administration aligned with Israeli interests.
Netanyahu will argue that Trump has asked for the war to end by January 20, the date of his inauguration.
He might even hint at Trump’s support for future West Bank annexation as a possibility, asserting that ending the war now could pave the way to the realization of the Right’s dream.
Conversely, if Kamala Harris claims the White House, Netanyahu will play a different hand entirely, painting a darker picture of what a Democratic administration could bring.
He will tell his right-wing allies that failing to end the Gaza war before Harris takes office risks inviting an American crackdown on the settlements in the West Bank – potentially even worse than the hardline policies of Barack Obama.
He would remind them of Obama’s “not a single brick” instruction during their first meeting, an encounter that Netanyahu later described as an “ambush” and which pressured Israel into a 10-month settlement freeze.
This time, he’ll insist, the stakes could be even higher. Ending the war before January, Netanyahu will argue, will be necessary to avoid American measures that could go so far as to undermine the IDF’s ability to even prosecute the wars that Smotrich and Ben-Gvir will want to see continue.
As a result, the most pressing deadline right now is not the fate of the hostages but the fate of America and who will be the next president.
That is what is driving the sudden change on both fronts: Lebanon, where on Thursday both Israelis and Lebanese were hinting that a deal was imminent and Gaza, where a hostage deal – albeit small in scope – might also be just days away.
Looming over all of this is the unpredictability of the American political transition. The period between the US election and the presidential inauguration has often proven volatile for Israeli-American relations.
During this time – when the outgoing president is free of political constraints and campaign commitments – Israel needs to be cautious.
It was during this transition period in 2016 that Obama allowed the UN Security Council to pass Resolution 2334, which condemned Israeli settlements and demanded their cessation.
While Israel saw the American abstention as a betrayal, there is concern now that President Joe Biden would allow a similar resolution to pass – perhaps this time even one that advocates for the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Such a resolution would be more likely if Trump wins. If Harris wins, Biden may hold back to avoid binding her administration’s hand.
Last edited:
The SC
INT'L MOD
The series of death and suffering continues in light of the continued Israeli bombing of various areas of the #Gaza Strip, coinciding with the Israeli army committing massacres, the latest of which was a “massacre against a family” after their home was bombed in the #Jabalia camp, north of the Strip, while the dead were still under the rubble.
Meengla
Elite Member
I have been following the Israeli sites for many months and this article on a main Israeli site is not surprising at all and sums up the general, overwhelming preference for Trump and a fear of Harris Presidency. As I said before, the Democratic Party is on an irreversible path of alienation from Israel. The change is slow but sure.
How will the US election determine Israel's future in war? | The Jerusalem Post
The result of the US election stands to redefine Israel’s war options. Netanyahu might be adept at navigating such diplomatic challenges, but he knows that this period calls for caution.
Whatever happens on Tuesday and whoever wins the US election, expect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to waste no time in leveraging the vote’s outcome to steer Israeli policy – to secure a deal for the hostages and to end the war in Lebanon.
If Donald Trump wins, Netanyahu will seize the opportunity to convince his coalition’s right-wing partners – particularly Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir – that concluding the conflict is essential to keep the incoming administration aligned with Israeli interests.
Netanyahu will argue that Trump has asked for the war to end by January 20, the date of his inauguration.
He might even hint at Trump’s support for future West Bank annexation as a possibility, asserting that ending the war now could pave the way to the realization of the Right’s dream.
Conversely, if Kamala Harris claims the White House, Netanyahu will play a different hand entirely, painting a darker picture of what a Democratic administration could bring.
He will tell his right-wing allies that failing to end the Gaza war before Harris takes office risks inviting an American crackdown on the settlements in the West Bank – potentially even worse than the hardline policies of Barack Obama.
He would remind them of Obama’s “not a single brick” instruction during their first meeting, an encounter that Netanyahu later described as an “ambush” and which pressured Israel into a 10-month settlement freeze.
This time, he’ll insist, the stakes could be even higher. Ending the war before January, Netanyahu will argue, will be necessary to avoid American measures that could go so far as to undermine the IDF’s ability to even prosecute the wars that Smotrich and Ben-Gvir will want to see continue.
As a result, the most pressing deadline right now is not the fate of the hostages but the fate of America and who will be the next president.
That is what is driving the sudden change on both fronts: Lebanon, where on Thursday both Israelis and Lebanese were hinting that a deal was imminent and Gaza, where a hostage deal – albeit small in scope – might also be just days away.
Looming over all of this is the unpredictability of the American political transition. The period between the US election and the presidential inauguration has often proven volatile for Israeli-American relations.
During this time – when the outgoing president is free of political constraints and campaign commitments – Israel needs to be cautious.
It was during this transition period in 2016 that Obama allowed the UN Security Council to pass Resolution 2334, which condemned Israeli settlements and demanded their cessation.
While Israel saw the American abstention as a betrayal, there is concern now that President Joe Biden would allow a similar resolution to pass – perhaps this time even one that advocates for the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Such a resolution would be more likely if Trump wins. If Harris wins, Biden may hold back to avoid binding her administration’s hand.
A Comment by a user to that article. Such delusions of grandeur! Oh, my! As if there was some large Ancient Israel Empire spanning Europe, Africa and the Middle East! These idiots really believe in their own propaganda!! It is one thing to seek a peaceful refuge for the Jewish people, it is another to project yourself to such delusional heights of moral supremacy and that too using the most cruel, violent ways!
I respectfully disagree.
If we believe our fate is in the hands of others, it is already over.
I am not speaking about the amount of military equipment we receive from the US and others. I am not speaking about whether America will pledge to protect Israel in case Iran or its proxies attack.
Even this cannot be taken for granted, regardless of who the next and future American Presidents will be.
If we pin our future hopes on the result of the American elections, it means that we do not trust ourselves.
If we do not trust ourselves, it means that we still haven't discovered the truly "supernatural" power and ability that is born out of our unity and mutual guarantee.
It means that we still do not understand our own history and we do not know how this Nation was born and what the purpose of this Nation is.
Our purpose is to rediscover, rebuild, and keep our original unity and mutual guarantee so we can show the crucially important and irreplaceable positive example of how human beings can survive above and against the inherently selfish, egotistic, and hateful human nature.
As soon as we embrace our purpose and implement our unity and mutual guarantee according to our original Jewish method, we can actually change the world and lead humanity to a safe future.
This is what Israel's and the world's future depends on and on nothing else.
Solomon2
Elite Member
"PALESTINE - under Turkish rule is comprised in two governments. DAMASCUS East of the River Jordan and Lebanon and BEIRUT or SIDON West, which are represented by the shaded lines."
Judea and Samaria are also clearly marked. No "West Bank" nonsense here.
Khansaheeb
Elite Member
Are you related to the monarchy , why the affinity for corrupt rulers who have lost their way and faith? They have turned to house of gay corrupts and lost the respect of the Ummah.
Last edited:
Khansaheeb
Elite Member
Should have kicked them out of Tanzania
- Status
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
-
-
-
-
TF-X / KAAN / Hürjet Turkish Fighter & Trainer Aircrafts News & Discussions (5 Viewers)
- Latest: hodor
