Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ive had some time to think about this, now that the dust is settling from the collapse of Assad regime.

First of all, the fall of Syria is definitely a strategic setback for Iran and a net gain for the Zionist entity.
BUT Im beginning to think that the long term consequences for the resistance are greatly exaggerated. First of all, we have absolutely no clue what is going to be born out of the Syrian situation. The zionist entity spared NO time in moving in on Syrian lands to occupy and shot Syrian protestors. Such overreach is self defeating, and breathes life into resistance, and Iran may find new partnership in Syria. If not with official government, with groups in Syria with which it finds common interests, to fight against Zionist aggression.

Furthermore t is becoming abundantly clear that Syria under Assad was steering away from Iran and the axis anyway, during later years, in favor of more ties with GCC governments.

Second of all, Iran can still clever ways to rearm Hezbollah. Hezbollah is self sufficient in the production of certain arms and munitions.
Even for the more heavier stuff, it will find its way to Lebanon, just like it found its way to Yemen, which has no land bridge with Iran and is thousands of kilometers away.

Im not going to sugarcoat things. What happened in Syria was indeed a setback, and it would be dumb to pretend otherwise.
But Im beginning to realise it was not the doom and gloom, that is being purported in Western media, which is essentially completely aligned with Western governments to wage a psychological war.

The Houthis just launched a missile that Israeli and American systems completely failed to intercept. And now there are reports of American navy pilots ejecting, supposedly out of "friendly fire" (what a joke), whereas I believe it was all done by the Yemenis.

I think that the change in Syria was the best thing that could have happened to Iran. If we remember, before the rebels started moving into Syria there was pressure building up on Iran to launch the True Promise 3 missile barrage on Israel. There was no way the Iranian leadership could have backed off that without loss of face and loss of credibility with all the supporters of Iran. On the other hand, it would have forced the Zionist Trump to order an attack on Iran.

Personally I don’t think that Iran is ready to fight the US/NATO/Israel on its own. Sure, it might inflict some damage on Israel, but at the cost of massive damage to itself.

Instead of going solo Iran should have the wisdom to swallow its pride and start working on creating an Islamic defense coalition, starting with Iran-Turkey.
 
Doesn't make any sense. If they play the cards right, they can have the settlements right in Syria. The parts abutting Israel with Druze are Israel friendly. More importantly, Syria proper itself may end up becoming Israel friendly. It is not written in the stars that Israel and all its Arab neighbors have to be permanently hostile. There is too much evidence that Arabs want to move on with life and not live in 1948 forever.
As I had remarked a few days ago, Islam is about 600 years younger than Christianity and, likely Christianity, Muslims too are going to be more 'secular' and 'pragmatic'. That might have sounded heresy to most here but I believe in human nature first and foremost before anything else.

When half naked women are dancing in Saudi Arabia you know changes are afoot. And they are not dancing in empty theaters. They are filled with Arab audiences cheering and enjoying.
Right. But I wont' blame the 'Arabs' just like I don't blame the 'Turks' or this or that. It has been a pattern of my posting to not pass blanket judgements and to make bold predictions of China-Russia-Arab-Muslim alliance blah blah that many do here.

Personally I don’t think that Iran is ready to fight the US/NATO/Israel on its own. Sure, it might inflict some damage on Israel, but at the cost of massive damage to itself.
Instead of going solo Iran should have the wisdom to swallow its pride and start working on creating an Islamic defense coalition, starting with Iran-Turkey.

Iran is already swallowing its pride. No country--with the possible exception of Yemen's Houthis--will allow itself to be bombed to the Stone Age to protect 8-10 million Palestinians who still reside in the historic Palestine.
 
As I had remarked a few days ago, Islam is about 600 years younger than Christianity and, likely Christianity, Muslims too are going to be more 'secular' and 'pragmatic'. That might have sounded heresy to most here but I believe in human nature first and foremost before anything else.


Right. But I wont' blame the 'Arabs' just like I don't blame the 'Turks' or this or that. It has been a pattern of my posting to not pass blanket judgements and to make bold predictions of China-Russia-Arab-Muslim alliance blah blah that many do here.



Iran is already swallowing its pride. No country--with the possible exception of Yemen's Houthis--will allow itself to be bombed to the Stone Age to protect 8-10 million Palestinians who still reside in the historic Palestine.

Believe it or not, even Iran cannot stop Yemenis now.

Yemenis and their words.
 
Iran position is like:

We want to help Palestine but we don’t nuke unless we get nuked.

We don’t hit Israeli infrastructures unless they hit our infrastructures.

We don’t hit Israel Dimona unless they hit ours.

Lots of calculations

I believe you. Yemenis have the least to lose in a major war and those who have the least to lose are willing to lose the most!

Yemen was bombed by Saudis to the point of rubbles.
Yemeni religion “stands on sword”
very very resilient
 
Iran position is like:
We want to help Palestine but we don’t nuke unless we get nuked.
We don’t hit Israeli infrastructures unless they hit our infrastructures.
We don’t hit Israel Dimona unless they hit ours.
Lots of calculations

Iran or even Pakistan is not in a position to 'nuke' Israel and vice versa. Nukes are not a joke. The last time was 1945 and since then there is unwritten global rule to not use unless a country's very existence is under threat and that rule applies between India and Pakistan more than any place else in the world. But it is good that the leadership in India and Pakistan are not head hots and stupid like the Middle Eastern leaders and that's probably because a large part of India and Pakistan population don't deep down hate each other along with they being Asiatic nations, which are not as bloodletting as the Middle Eastern and the European origin nations are. Well that's another topic.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I think that the change in Syria was the best thing that could have happened to Iran. If we remember, before the rebels started moving into Syria there was pressure building up on Iran to launch the True Promise 3 missile barrage on Israel. There was no way the Iranian leadership could have backed off that without loss of face and loss of credibility with all the supporters of Iran. On the other hand, it would have forced the Zionist Trump to order an attack on Iran.

Personally I don’t think that Iran is ready to fight the US/NATO/Israel on its own. Sure, it might inflict some damage on Israel, but at the cost of massive damage to itself.

Instead of going solo Iran should have the wisdom to swallow its pride and start working on creating an Islamic defense coalition, starting with Iran-Turkey.


Yes that is probably correct.

However it seems like Iran would probably not even have carried out TP3 even without Syrian events as it still thinks it can negotiate with West/US to keep itself from being more heavily sanctioned when Trump comes back into office. Not sure whether this strategy is feasible as Zio-US gets more emboldened the more weakness it senses.

In some ways the whole situation is not Iran’s fault as it was dragged into this with Hamas attack of October 7th.

Iran was always wanting to wait till circa 2030 before it would have been prepared to seriously challenge Zio-US in ME.
 
another IDF terrorist "seriously injured" as Palestinians continue to resist the Zio-Nazi invasion of Gaza

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
another IDF terrorist "seriously injured" as Palestinians continue to resist the Zio-Nazi invasion of Gaza

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.




INSHALLAH another 1000000 of these baby-killers are hopefully "seriously injured".
 
As I had remarked a few days ago, Islam is about 600 years younger than Christianity and, likely Christianity, Muslims too are going to be more 'secular' and 'pragmatic'. That might have sounded heresy to most here but I believe in human nature first and foremost before anything else.

I would have to disagree on the premise.
Its implied that because Islam is "younger" (which it is not) it have more zeal.
Couldnt be farther from the truth.
Xtianity is actually younger than Islam, and have far more zeal than muslims.
Its evident from the conquest of Americas and Africa... and even countries like Philipines and newly ongoing xtianization in Korea.

Judging the Euro-American world from the post WW2 perspective gives a complete false historic view of xtianity. Western Europeans were barbarians who adopted Xtianity, largely in the end of 1st millennium. Its effectively a Roman religion with a thin Semitic top layer.

Islam and muslims was always more pragmatic than Xtianity and other religions.
In fact the muslim community was commanded to be a nation of the middleground by the prophet himself. Islam by definition of Islamic theology and jurisprudence IS PRAGMATISM. The Prophet was the DEFINITION of pragmatism in all his political and strategic dealings.

So why do we say muslims are becoming pragmatists? When in fact its the western European world which came out of barbarism by coming in contact with the pragmatist high civilization of Islam.

What we in reality is seeeing today is a Western led world order and therefore also economic order, where every nation including muslim, hindu and chinese, must adhere to western success formula. Its always like this; the policies, tactics and culture of the dominant ruling political class/nation is always copied by those who are ruled over. Its human nature and a survival instinct.

I bet if western world and its economy collapsed completeley tomorrow by somewhow, then the rest of world will follow a completeley different trajectory.

Muslims countries historically was FAR more socially tolerant and laissez-faire than the Western European world. This role completeley reversed in th 20th century. Not because Muslim countries became a lot less socially tolerant, which it did to some extant, but its more about the MASSIVE change that took place in the western world itself, that propelled it to become MORE socially tolerant than Islamic world within a 100 years, as the western worlds main conquest phase had ended and The Age of Western led commerce replaced it.

Right. But I wont' blame the 'Arabs' just like I don't blame the 'Turks' or this or that. It has been a pattern of my posting to not pass blanket judgements and to make bold predictions of China-Russia-Arab-Muslim alliance blah blah that many do here.

Arabs sorrounding Palestine cant really do that much for palestinians.
Just like rest of South Asian pricipalities (warlords) could do very little to stem the establishment of a british colony in Bengal, which down the line went onto conqour rest of the subcontinent.

Israel continues to exists and kill and maim, not because its strong or anything. But because the countries sorrounding it are weak and fighting against eachother. If arab world was united, not even the United States could have come to Israels rescue.

Iran is already swallowing its pride. No country--with the possible exception of Yemen's Houthis--will allow itself to be bombed to the Stone Age to protect 8-10 million Palestinians who still reside in the historic Palestine.

I believe as dark as it may seem, we actually have seen the high tide of Israel pass already 3 decades ago. I firmly believe Palestinian, although they will suffer for while, will eventually vanquish the colonialists. There is a reason they have survived and thrived in that geostragically volatile area for literally thousands of years. Assyrians, Egyptians, Babylonians, Persians and Romans came and went one by one. But genetics show that Palestinians are largey descendants of the native semitic population who have lived there for almost 10 000 years. These people are some the most enduring and resillient on Earth. I salute them.
 
Last edited:
As I had remarked a few days ago, Islam is about 600 years younger than Christianity and, likely Christianity, Muslims too are going to be more 'secular' and 'pragmatic'. That might have sounded heresy to most here but I believe in human nature first and foremost before anything else.
Fully agreed. I think the same. In fact I see the change in Saudi (women driving, clothing, etc) and other positive changes in the larger middle east as the first steps towards that direction. And middle east is ground zero for Islam. Changes there fan out across the Muslim world.

I think it was inevitable. It's just that oil wealth allowed for a status quo freeze in social and religious evolution in middle east for nearly a century. Now that this oil wealth is no longer guaranteed, middle east is starting to march with the rest of the world.
 
The slaughter continues as Western powers and their allies continue to turn the blind eye in Gaza:-

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top