Jerusalem Post: Will a new Sunni axis reshape the Middle East? - opinion

PaklovesTurkiye

Elite Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
8,057
Reaction score
20,444
Reputation
1,339.5
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

“Sunni axis” is a term that is gaining currency. It refers to a new security alliance of Sunni states that seems to be emerging, with the SMDA at its heart. Turkey and Qatar will probably join.

By NEVILLE TELLER
JUNE 1, 2026 17:00


“Sunni axis” is a term that is gaining currency. It refers to a new security alliance of Sunni states that seems to be emerging. At its heart is a Pakistan-Saudi Arabia mutual defense pact signed on September 17, 2025 – the Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement (SMDA).

One noteworthy feature of the SMDA pact is an explicit collective‑defense clause that closely echoes NATO’s Article 5, namely that “any attack on one country will be viewed as an attack on both.” This has led some commentators to dub the agreement an Islamic NATO.

This Pakistan-Saudi arrangement, according to Pakistani ministers, is not only capable of being expanded, but action is in hand to do so. Turkey and Qatar have been mentioned as the first states to turn the bilateral pact into a collective‑security grouping. Egypt is a fifth potential member.

Back in January, Turkey was said to be in advanced discussions to join the SMDA pact. It seemed a natural and appropriate extension of an existing partnership. Turkey is Pakistan’s second‑largest arms supplier, and the military‑industrial connection is flourishing in terms of aircraft, drones, and naval assets.

In an interview with Reuters, reported on January 15, 2026, Pakistan’s Defense Production Minister Raza Hayat Harraj said: “The Pakistan–Saudi Arabia–Turkey trilateral agreement is something that is already in the pipeline.”

His words presaged an axis that grouped key Sunni powers (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Turkey, Qatar, and potentially Egypt) on one side of a regional balance, with Iran’s mainly Shi’ite but essentially anti-Israel network (Iran, Iraq‑based pro-Iran militias, Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, etc.) on the other.

However, something of a change of tone seemed to emerge in an interview given to the Bloomberg news agency by Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif on May 13.

While discussing the idea that Turkey and Qatar may join the mutual defense cooperation pact between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, Asif said “if Qatar and Turkey also join this existing agreement, it will be a welcome development,” a comment that clearly viewed their participation as a possibility rather than “in the pipeline,” as his ministerial colleague had claimed back in January.

Whether there has been a cooling of enthusiasm on Pakistan’s part is difficult to assess. The glitch may be caused by the prospect of a tighter Turkish-Saudi connection. They remain, in many arenas, competitors for leadership of the Sunni world. Moreover, despite the recent rapprochement, relations have been anything but warm over some of the past eight years.

It was on October 2, 2018, that Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi was assassinated inside the Saudi Arabian consulate in Istanbul. Turkey reacted with fury. In a series of speeches and leaks, Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called the murder “savage,” said it was ordered from the “highest levels” of the Saudi state, and demanded the extradition of the Saudi suspects.

Turkish authorities opened a criminal investigation, searched the Saudi consulate and the consul’s residence, and leaked detailed allegations to the media about Khashoggi’s strangling, dismemberment, and the pre‑planned nature of the operation. Turkey then launched a trial in absentia of 26 Saudis, deepening the rift with Saudi Arabia, which insisted its own courts had jurisdiction.

The thaw took a few years to develop. Finally, on April 7, 2022, an Istanbul court halted the trial and transferred the Khashoggi case to Saudi Arabia. On April 28, Erdogan visited Saudi Arabia, met King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), and said he hoped “to launch a new era.” On June 21, 2022, MBS paid his first visit to Turkey since 2018.

On the face of it, Turkish-Saudi relations should be firmly re‑established. However, negotiations aimed at bringing Turkey into the Pakistan-Saudi security pact have been dragging on now for half a year, and the arrangement is still not ready to be implemented. Instead, the political narrative has drifted toward a flexible Saudi‑centric security framework in which Turkey would be less than a full partner.

Regional Implications

If actually completed on the lines originally envisaged, the new Sunni axis would amalgamate four formidable components: Saudi and Qatari financial resources and arms‑procurement; Turkey’s NATO‑standard conventional forces and advanced defense‑industrial base; Pakistan’s nuclear deterrent and ballistic‑missile capabilities; and Egypt’s massed conventional army, control of the Suez corridor, and diplomatic weight in Arab and Gulf security affairs.

These powerful elements could theoretically give it the ability to deter conventional attacks and influence conflicts across the Middle East and beyond. In reality, however, converting the security pact into a tightly disciplined combat-ready military alliance is less than likely. Internal divergences, domestic constraints, and each state’s ties to Washington, Beijing, Moscow, and Brussels would rule it out.

Even so, several interested parties and groupings perceive this Sunni axis as at least potentially threatening.

Iran and its allies would naturally be apprehensive about the emergence of a Sunni power bloc opposed to the Iranian regime’s bid for regional and religious dominance in the Middle East, and widely seen as a counterweight to Iran’s Axis of Resistance.

Indian analysts have already warned that a consolidated Pakistan–Saudi–Turkey security structure, backed by oil wealth and Pakistani nuclear capability, would upset the current security balance and challenge India’s defense environment.

Some Israeli strategic commentators believe that a more cohesive Sunni military grouping involving Turkey and Qatar could constrain Israel’s operational freedom. Both Turkey and Qatar have a history of supporting Hamas.

Some eastern Mediterranean states, such as Greece, Cyprus, and Armenia, are already at odds with Ankara, and view with concern the prospect of Turkey being backed in the future by Gulf money and Pakistani deterrence.

But all this calculation seems premature. Extending the Pakistan-Saudi defense and security pact to embrace other Sunni states, such as Turkey, Qatar, and Egypt, seems far from imminent. Even Turkey, apparently on the verge of full accession back in January, is still hovering in the wings, talking about the possibility.

In short, if the enhanced alliance emerges, it would indeed be a significant new factor in the region’s political alignment. Even in prospect, it is enough to shape calculations in Tehran, New Delhi, Jerusalem, and Washington. But a new Sunni axis simply does not yet exist.

The writer, a former senior civil servant, is the Middle East correspondent for Eurasia Review. Follow him at: www.a-mid-east-journal.blogspot.com
 
Source:
Jerusalem Post
It's complete hasbara.

The chatter of "sunni" axis or "shia" crescent comes from neither sunnis nor shias. It is important, psychologically, to uncouple ourselves from this simplification, as we all know where such phraseology will be taking us.

In reality, Israel is opposed by anyone who believes in the most basic of morality based context, be they sunnis, shias, atheists, Christians, or even Jews.
 
It's complete hasbara.

The chatter of "sunni" axis or "shia" crescent comes from neither sunnis nor shias. It is important, psychologically, to uncouple ourselves from this simplification, as we all know where such phraseology will be taking us.

In reality, Israel is opposed by anyone who believes in the most basic of morality based context, be they sunnis, shias, atheists, Christians, or even Jews.
Exactly - even some Qatari or Emirati specifically called Pakistan a “Sunni Power” which raised my eyebrows. Then you have fair-weather “Sunnis” on PDF that become Khalid Ibn Walid (ra) if the fight is against Shia and other Muslim sects, meanwhile they become peacenik when it’s Jews, or neo-Christians, and Hindus GRaping and terrorizing Sunnis populations across the planet.

I saw the exchange between @Watandar and that Krash fellow. I’m glad i didn’t join in.

The Israelis and Indians have been using this Shia vs Sunni playbook since the 1980s. Even in India, they’ll use “Shia” sounding names to produce anti-Islamic propaganda.
 
Exactly - even some Qatari or Emirati specifically called Pakistan a “Sunni Power” which raised my eyebrows. Then you have fair-weather “Sunnis” on PDF that become Khalid Ibn Walid (ra) if the fight is against Shia and other Muslim sects, meanwhile they become peacenik when it’s Jews, or neo-Christians, and Hindus GRaping and terrorizing Sunnis populations across the planet.

I saw the exchange between @Watandar and that Krash fellow. I’m glad i didn’t join in.

The Israelis and Indians have been using this Shia vs Sunni playbook since the 1980s. Even in India, they’ll use “Shia” sounding names to produce anti-Islamic propaganda.
Agree with your viewpoint.
 
Agree with your views. Also I have a problem with taking the bait :( Need to work on it.
@krash isn’t wrong tbh. The problem is that we were poked too many times and someone had to react. Iran to its credit built up its military to the fight US. Pakistan and Turkey are building up its strength quietly.

We play to our strengths
 
@krash isn’t wrong tbh. The problem is that we were poked too many times and someone had to react. Iran to its credit built up its military to the fight US. Pakistan and Turkey are building up its strength quietly.

We play to our strengths
I do understand that. You have applied the correct nuance.
 
What about Uzbekistan, Egypt, and Morocco. Are they not Sunni powers as well?

There are only 4 Shia majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Azerbaijan, and Bahrain.
 
It's complete hasbara.

The chatter of "sunni" axis or "shia" crescent comes from neither sunnis nor shias.

Yet, readily played into by simpletons with vile loyalties based on insecurities searching for answers in non-existing allegiances through faith, culture, and/or ethno-nationalism. Don't forget the 90s or the many posters here who are too stupid to see where they actually belong. The Arabs and the Iranians will not spare spit for you and me.
 
100% hasbara. Israel needs enemies in the media; they created Hamas, together with the CIA they created ISIS/Al-Qaeda, they confronted Iran (and its allies), and now they need to create a new adversary: the so-called "Sunni axis"... which obviously doesn't exist. In this way, Israel will justify more decades of extermination of neighboring countries.

NOTE: If the Zionist media manages to destroy Iran's nuclear program, it will be obvious that Pakistan's nuclear program will also be dismantled within a few decades, using the same strategies that were used against Iran.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top