JF-17 PFX program

Sorry. I thought the relevant discussion had already ended. After reading it, please notify me to delete it.





 
Block III+ Is basically the capabilities within the J-10C, but to push the plane to its limits; a liquid cooled GaN of 1000+ T/R modules on a swashplate. An IRST, an internal AESA jammer, a towed decoy, an upgraded datalink, RAM coating, an APU and OBOGS to allow more remote operations in dispersal to motorway operations, and retractable IFR probe to improve RCS signature.

It’s like building a new plane. All of those upgrades might be possible in the next block.

Pakistan’s air force has been steadily upgrading its fleet to keep pace with modern threats. The JF‑17 Block III was a big step forward, an affordable, locally produced, and equipped with advanced radar and weapons. But as a lightweight fighter, it couldn’t match the range or power of heavier jets.

That’s why Pakistan bought J‑10C, a more capable aircraft with stronger radar and better combat performance. Even so, the J‑10C isn’t stealthy and has its own limits.

To prepare for the future, Pakistan is now moving toward fifth generation fighters. The J‑35 offers stealth and advanced sensors, while participation in Turkey’s KAAN project shows Pakistan’s intent to eventually build its own cutting edge jets.

Each step from JF‑17, J‑10C, J‑35, and KAAN reflects Pakistan’s strategy of filling gaps, learning from limitations, and building toward independence in advanced fighter production.
 
It’s like building a new plane. All of those upgrades might be possible in the next block.

Pakistan’s air force has been steadily upgrading its fleet to keep pace with modern threats. The JF‑17 Block III was a big step forward, an affordable, locally produced, and equipped with advanced radar and weapons. But as a lightweight fighter, it couldn’t match the range or power of heavier jets.

That’s why Pakistan bought J‑10C, a more capable aircraft with stronger radar and better combat performance. Even so, the J‑10C isn’t stealthy and has its own limits.

To prepare for the future, Pakistan is now moving toward fifth generation fighters. The J‑35 offers stealth and advanced sensors, while participation in Turkey’s KAAN project shows Pakistan’s intent to eventually build its own cutting edge jets.

Each step from JF‑17, J‑10C, J‑35, and KAAN reflects Pakistan’s strategy of filling gaps, learning from limitations, and building toward independence in advanced fighter production.
A complete fighter jet consists of the airframe platform, subsystems, and supporting environment.
The collaboration between PAC and CAC was actually focused on the JF-17's airframe platform and integration capabilities.

We generally believe that the JF-17 Block III has already pushed the JF-17 airframe platform to its limits. There is very little room for further upgrades.

Therefore, continuing to discuss the future of the JF-17 doesn't have much meaning.

Pakistan could renegotiate with AVIC to jointly develop a new airframe platform. Or, it could introduce a Chinese airframe platform for secondary development. This platform should at least have the potential to support continuous development for about 30 years. Of course, Pakistan can choose other partners instead of AVIC; this is entirely up to Pakistan.

Pakistan should abandon further development of the existing JF-17 airframe platform and focus on a new generation fighter platform. Whether it retains the "JF-17" name is not important.
 
A complete fighter jet consists of the airframe platform, subsystems, and supporting environment.
The collaboration between PAC and CAC was actually focused on the JF-17's airframe platform and integration capabilities.

We generally believe that the JF-17 Block III has already pushed the JF-17 airframe platform to its limits. There is very little room for further upgrades.

Therefore, continuing to discuss the future of the JF-17 doesn't have much meaning.

Pakistan could renegotiate with AVIC to jointly develop a new airframe platform. Or, it could introduce a Chinese airframe platform for secondary development. This platform should at least have the potential to support continuous development for about 30 years. Of course, Pakistan can choose other partners instead of AVIC; this is entirely up to Pakistan.

Pakistan should abandon further development of the existing JF-17 airframe platform and focus on a new generation fighter platform. Whether it retains the "JF-17" name is not important.

This already in work and that’s what I tried to explain by pointing out the limitation of platforms.
 
Sorry. I thought the relevant discussion had already ended. After reading it, please notify me to delete it.







And you think of these is a credible source? And even more all speak of PLANS and none of them says anything about it is already happening!
 
Sorry. I thought the relevant discussion had already ended. After reading it, please notify me to delete it.





Again you bring crap and junk sources, not reliable at all , give us sources from respectable defense sites like Janes defense weekly/ Flight Global/Aviation week etc etc
 
Guys he said kamla not kamra. Learn the difference 🌝
 
Sorry. I thought the relevant discussion had already ended. After reading it, please notify me to delete it.





A lot of this has to do with potential workshare on the TFX, but even that is highly speculative, and there's no firm details as far as I'm aware. But where in any of this does it say that Türkiye and Pakistan jointly produce the JF17 in Kamra? That was what you claimed.
 
I believe many people have seen it. Okay. Now forget about it.
 
I believe many people have seen it. Okay. Now forget about it.
where your source/ backup that we are producing JF17 with Türkiye ,are you 4 year old toddler who knows nothing about JF-17 Project? why you avoiding to give me an answer my question?
 
Bro, please calm down. I won't answer your question. Just because I completely look down on you.😊
because you won't have any solid and hard evidence that we producing JF-17 with Türkiye, even 4 year old in Pakistan knows that we are producing JF-17 with China not with Türkiye
 
What should I do? I have been looking down on him since 2017 until now.😔
what you're new to this forum, I'm here on PDF (defunct older PDF) since 2011, I don't know who you're but I know one thing that you're baseless troll and have a senseless rants about JF-17 program
 
Guys he said kamla not kamra. Learn the difference 🌝


The point is still, there IS - present tense - NO co-production of JF-17 with any Turkish company regardless its Kamla or Kamra!

It's pure BS! He's just spreading lies and is not even presenting true sources.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top