www.thenews.com.pk
Hi,I’m genuinely surprised that a few individuals here—including a moderator—seem unwilling to consider opinions that differ from their own deeply held views. Let me be clear: repeatedly targeting any gender in discussions is, at the very least, sexist.
As a Pakistani citizen, I don’t feel the need to constantly validate my background or motivations. If my posts don't align with your views and you find them offensive, go ahead and block me. I have long been an active member of various Facebook groups focused on PAF related aircraft and can continue to engage there with like-minded individuals.
Shahzad Iqbal of Geo News reported this in his article that all the aircraft were shot down by J-10C. He was the first one breaking news of a 98 Nautical Miles engagement range by J-10C. His report was widely circulated in the media for 98 Nautical Miles BVR shoot down by J-10C. But because his news in that same article that all the aircraft being downed by J-10Cs were against the wishes of few here wasn't mentioned at all. Here is the reference for his article in The News:
How PAF cut IAF down to size after Indian attack on Pakistan
INDIAN misadventures on the nights of May 7 and May 9 have dragged India into new lows, after the Pakistan Army and the Pakistan Air Force not only successfully defended Pakistani land and airspace...
Meanwhile you guys can live in your own world and follow fake posts like the recent post from "Ace of PAF" related to downing a MiG-29 UPG showing an image of JF-17 Block 2 armed with a PL-15 missile alongside it. That very image was debunked years ago when it was initially posted by Ace of PAF, and @Deino had already confirmed it as fake and nonsense at that time.
I agree, no one should abuse your sex, whatever that may be, although it's clear you're an idiot who doesn't know what you're talking about. Before this conflict the PAF released images of JF17 with dual rack PL15s. The PAF used approx 40 aircraft, most of which were JF17s, given the fewer number of J10Cs in the fleet. It's highly likely that some of the kills were attributed to the JF17. But in any case, let's assume you're right, let's just say all the 6 Indian fighters were destroyed by the handful of J10Cs, that just goes to show the superiority of the J10 against the Rafale and the best the IAF has, so what? You have a serious inferiority complex about the JF17 for some reason, I wonder why? Whether you're female or gender fluid, or a transgender indian pretending to be a Pakistani, it doesn't really matter or change anything. You can carry on with your inferiority complex about the JF17.I’m genuinely surprised that a few individuals here—including a moderator—seem unwilling to consider opinions that differ from their own deeply held views. Let me be clear: repeatedly targeting any gender in discussions is, at the very least, sexist.
As a Pakistani citizen, I don’t feel the need to constantly validate my background or motivations. If my posts don't align with your views and you find them offensive, go ahead and block me. I have long been an active member of various Facebook groups focused on PAF related aircraft and can continue to engage there with like-minded individuals.
Shahzad Iqbal of Geo News reported this in his article that all the aircraft were shot down by J-10C. He was the first one breaking news of a 98 Nautical Miles engagement range by J-10C. His report was widely circulated in the media for 98 Nautical Miles BVR shoot down by J-10C. But because his news in that same article that all the aircraft being downed by J-10Cs were against the wishes of few here wasn't mentioned at all. Here is the reference for his article in The News:
How PAF cut IAF down to size after Indian attack on Pakistan
INDIAN misadventures on the nights of May 7 and May 9 have dragged India into new lows, after the Pakistan Army and the Pakistan Air Force not only successfully defended Pakistani land and airspace...
Meanwhile you guys can live in your own world and follow fake posts like the recent post from "Ace of PAF" related to downing a MiG-29 UPG showing an image of JF-17 Block 2 armed with a PL-15 missile alongside it. That very image was debunked years ago when it was initially posted by Ace of PAF, and @Deino had already confirmed it as fake and nonsense at that time.
You are giving away your identity too soon.I’m genuinely surprised that a few individuals here—including a moderator—seem unwilling to consider opinions that differ from their own deeply held views. Let me be clear: repeatedly targeting any gender in discussions is, at the very least, sexist.
As a Pakistani citizen, I don’t feel the need to constantly validate my background or motivations. If my posts don't align with your views and you find them offensive, go ahead and block me. I have long been an active member of various Facebook groups focused on PAF related aircraft and can continue to engage there with like-minded individuals.
Shahzad Iqbal of Geo News reported this in his article that all the aircraft were shot down by J-10C. He was the first one breaking news of a 98 Nautical Miles engagement range by J-10C. His report was widely circulated in the media for 98 Nautical Miles BVR shoot down by J-10C. But because his news in that same article that all the aircraft being downed by J-10Cs were against the wishes of few here wasn't mentioned at all. Here is the reference for his article in The News:
How PAF cut IAF down to size after Indian attack on Pakistan
INDIAN misadventures on the nights of May 7 and May 9 have dragged India into new lows, after the Pakistan Army and the Pakistan Air Force not only successfully defended Pakistani land and airspace...
Meanwhile you guys can live in your own world and follow fake posts like the recent post from "Ace of PAF" related to downing a MiG-29 UPG showing an image of JF-17 Block 2 armed with a PL-15 missile alongside it. That very image was debunked years ago when it was initially posted by Ace of PAF, and @Deino had already confirmed it as fake and nonsense at that time.
Your indian sources are correct, just as they were correct about the range of the "export" variant of the PL15E.
Brother, I’ve come with my full name, and you can check me on Google Scholar. I’m not Indian, but when those Indian nonsense videos came up on YouTube, I watched them, though I couldn’t watch them fully. They were saying they have some UK drone that can copy the RCS and electronic signature of any aircraft, haha and the Pakistanis got fooled, thinking they shot down our plane. So, you fools, why was then the IAF grounded for two days due to a tactical error? They didn’t discuss that. Then they went on to say they hit 11% of PAF assets in the air and on the ground, and the next guy was saying that amounts to 40 planes, and that’s when I’d had enough. They’ve become an extremely ignorant nation; otherwise, I used to rate them highly intellectually before. That’s when this question came to my mind while they were discussing the JF-17. and if there are any sensitive information it must not be discussed here openly. if radar range and engine secrecy can have some advantage in the future encounter for us then my questions must be ignored
I have read that ABC article. the question is whether we have integrated PL15 also with our awacs? if yes then india is doomed as no way they can have something like metoer and no way they can integrate them without french
Hi,
Pakistani air force uses Link-17 system ensures secure communication between fighter jets, AWACS, and ground-based radar, enhancing battlefield awareness and coordination. These capabilities significantly strengthen Pakistan’s air combat effectiveness.
