Makkah Joint Defense Agreement: Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, news & updates

[Watandar]

Good analysis by this Israeli analyst. The driving force behind this pact is Saudi Arabia and it's fears/interests.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Iran's Explosive Response to Mecca Pact | Pakistan, Saudi Arabia & Turkey Unite​

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Watandar]

​

Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan Sign Joint Defense Pact​

The agreement treats an attack on any of the countries as an attack on all, but in a region of volatile rivalries, it was unclear what that would mean in practice.

A photo released by the Turkish presidential office shows the country’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, being welcomed by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, on Friday.Credit...Murat Cetinmuhurdar/Turkish Presidential Press Office, via Reuters

By Ben Hubbard

Reporting from Beirut, Lebanon
Aug. 7, 2026

Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a new pact on Friday committing to collective defense against attacks on any of the three nations, Saudi Arabia said, in an agreement that could reshape the strategic layout of the Middle East.

The text of the agreement was not made public, making it unclear what the parties’ obligations are. But the Pakistani Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the pact “stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all.”

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, who traveled to Saudi Arabia to sign the agreement, said in a post on social media that its implementation could include joint defense industry projects and counterterrorism operations.

The idea for a pact bringing together Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan evolved this year as wars and instability across the Middle East led many countries to explore new ways to enhance their security without relying on the United States and other Western powers.

Fueling this thinking were the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran; new attacks on Saudi Arabia that it has blamed on Iran’s allies in Yemen and Iraq; concerns about Israel’s expanding military actions; and doubts about the reliability of the United States as a defense guarantor for its Middle Eastern partners.

The pact, dubbed the Mecca Joint Defense Agreement, was signed on Friday in the holy city of Mecca in Saudi Arabia by Mr. Erdogan, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif.

While Egypt participated in early discussions about such a pact, it was not mentioned as a participant on Friday.

Officials from the three countries released similar statements saying that the agreement was defensive in nature, that it was not aimed at any specific country and that other states could join.

Rayed Krimly, Saudi Arabia’s deputy minister for public diplomacy, wrote on social media that the pact would allow the three countries to integrate their defenses to deter threats.

​

He also said that the three Muslim-majority nations did not seek to establish a new “military axis or sectarian bloc” or set off an arms race. He said the agreement would not get in the way of the individual countries’ other international obligations.

Asfandyar Mir, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center, a Washington-based research group, said the agreement was less about NATO-style military integration than about political signaling.

“What matters is three militarily capable states, in crucial geographies, with diverse relationships, are committing to one another’s defense,” he said.

“It is not intended to replace the United States,” he added. “But it certainly reflects a judgment that U.S. commitment alone is no longer sufficient to ensure security and maintain stability.”

The new pact follows efforts by Saudi Arabia to build a maritime coalition to deter attacks in the Red Sea. Last month, the kingdom invited dozens of countries to join. At least 14, including Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan and Nigeria, affirmed their support, although it remains unclear how the coalition will function.

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan already have a mutual defense pact. That agreement, signed in September 2025, “states that any aggression against either country shall be considered an aggression against both.”

Even after Iranian attacks on Saudi Arabia, Pakistan avoided direct conflict with Iran, with which it also has close ties. In March, Pakistan’s army chief met with Saudi Arabia’s defense minister to discuss Iran’s attacks on the kingdom, and Pakistan warned Iran that it was bound by the defense agreement.

The new agreement brings together three powerful countries with different strengths whose combined territory extends into Europe and Asia.

Turkey has a large military and a growing defense industry, known for producing everything from artillery shells to advanced drones and selling them to a wide range of countries.

Pakistan, too, boasts a strong military as well as a nuclear arsenal. And Saudi Arabia’s huge oil reserves give it financial heft, alongside the geographic advantage of its long coasts on the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.

But each country also brings its own conflicts and security problems, which its partners may hesitate to get involved with.

Turkey, a NATO member, has long-running territorial disputes with Greece in the Aegean Sea as well as an increasingly acrimonious relationship with Israel.

Since last year, Pakistan has been involved in active conflict with two of its neighbors, India and Afghanistan. It fought four days of clashes with India last May. And it declared “open war” in late February against Afghanistan, which it accuses of sponsoring attacks on Pakistan. Afghanistan denies that.

Saudi Arabia sits across the Persian Gulf from Iran, which has launched attacks on the kingdom in retaliation for U.S. and Israeli attacks. It must also deal with Houthi rebels in Yemen, who have launched attacks on Saudi shipping in the Red Sea.

On Friday, the spokesman for a Saudi-led military coalition in Yemen, Maj. Gen. Turki al-Malki, said in a statement that Houthi shelling the day before had injured 11 civilians in southern Saudi Arabia, including a Pakistani citizen.

 

[Starlord]

So if India attacks Pakistan again, will Turkey and Saudi respond?

Yes both military are ready to unleash hell on each other, relax buddy... this agreement is gonna work as deterrance, if this PACT make India think twice from going on any adventure then it means its working, and even if war breaks out between 2 nuclear nations, it will be a calculated escalation and Pakistan is more than capable of taking India on without KSA/Turkiye troops, we just need resources and build our economy so we can spend on education and other industries.

 

[Agnostic Muslim]

Houthis are a small pain, Pakistan does not need to carpet bomb Iran, although without any air defence it is easily done. You might get one of your farmers to fire off a lucky shot, but yeah, try that shit on Pakistan, last time I remember you bombed one Pakistani target and we hit back 7 Iranian targets then your little foreign minister ran to Islamabad claiming we are "brothers"

Talk is cheap huh?

Wow.

All this braggadocio - please enlighten us as to how this mighty hammer of Pakistan has completely cowed into submission the ragtag militias in Afghanistan, that in various shapes and forms, have massacred tens of thousands of Pakistanis, and continue to do so.

Maybe deal with that shit show and improve domestic governance thats also in the gutter before threatening other nations.

 

[PakAl]

The biggest regional problem is this: Israel, instead of becoming a refuge for the Jewish refugees fleeing Europe after WW II, became an entity to make tons of generational money to some elites in European and American societies. If the purpose was the use a dagger in a region to make the money, then that purpose was inherently violent. And it was backed by a Superpower--a Hyperpower. But violence is not any race, any nation's monopoly: As Human beings, we all learn!

And as careful as I am in my 'predictions', the Israel Project is about done. They could, if they live to be part of the region, still salvage themselves and live to live in their 1948 borders. Otherwise, I really think they are doomed. Notice how little the Israelis talk about the 1948, the 1967, or the 1973 wars? Notice how little the Israelis post to 'Comments' to their own news outlets in last 1-2 years? Notice the flight of Israelis out of Israel? All those speak of a defeated nation, of a defeated ideology. Even the AIPAC in America doesn't bring up 'Israel' as much despite planning to spend twice for the 2026 midterms.

It would be great if this happens, Israel retreates back to Europe or Usa and we finally see some peace in the middleeast but according to the Israelis they have become the dominating power in the middleeast, even Usa is passing legislations to merge supply chain with Israel etc, this shows they plan to stay here till the end. Usa will also remain superpower for decades.

US House passes $1.15 trillion military bill expanding Israel cooperation

Bill to fund war on Iran and a handful of Trump priorities passes largely along party lines, faces Senate uncertainty.

www.aljazeera.com

 

[Cipher212]

Big fancy name, got "Makkah" in it. Nice Islamic touch. Seems ceremonial tbh. Another Pak classic MoU.

What exactly is this deal and who are these 3 countries supposed to band up against? Are we going to send troops to fight the Kurds or Houthis now?

Pakistan has the biggest military of the 3. So are we going to provide grunts for money? 1980s wala formula I guess.

 

[Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ]

Even if the intention is sincere in this pact to confront zios in future while establishing security and all other kinds of frame networks, one contesting question remains which is how this pact will posture itself towards Iran, Yemen and Lebanon, that will clarify a lot.

One of the major repercussions of sectarianism and takfiri ideology was to start calling people claiming fundamental tenets of Islam as being apostates. Which crescendoed into calling a vast majority of Muslims as apostates. Creating a niche for those who already were outside of the fold... the people of the book. A peripheral look...
In, we can live with them but cannot with those who claim Islam.
That spear blunted over time but not before it paced into entropy... where we find ourselves today... picking up pieces and retracing routes. Shades of European Protestantism...

Anyways, this whole preamble to say that things are coming full circle both in east and in the west... which is amplifying the role that zion played everywhere. Ones living here for generations didn't need nukes to undo humanity. The whole social and philosophical dynamic is different... one where living are captives of their conscience... it is not to end humanity on a hill of personal or racial superiority.

Yet, that was the battle fought against the empire who only needed men for their economic output and nothing more. Wanted grip over violence to keep monopoly over the masses. And that will not pass without exacting it's price. For the rest, we'll manage to live in peace once more... we always did.

 

[PakAl]

Where is the MB in this alliance? no , we stayed out of this alliance because it's not intended for israel or the west , it's intended to ruin the middle eastern nations more.
we won't join trust my words.

Turkey and Egypt relations broke down because of Turkish support to MB, although recently improving again. The MB under Morsi used to encourage jihad in Syria but Egyptian military opposed this (one of the reason for relationship breakdown), Saudi nearly invaded Qatar due to MB support, only for Turkey intervention which stopped the attack. Today Turkey and Saudia reached compromise and are ruling Syria together. My point was nations interests and policies need to align in order to form military alliances, and hopefully when Egypt Turkey sort out their issues Egypt will also join, same with Kuwait Bahrain Qatar. UAE at the moment is against Islamist but if in the future they change their policies they too will become part of this defence treaty. Iran has major issues with Saudia and this is why they are not part of this, if Iran Saudis can sort out their issues then Pakistan Turkey wouldn't oppose this, plus Iran Usa Israel issues need to be sorted out. Some people think this defence treaty is against Israel meanwhile Usa may sell F35s to Turkey and Saudis lol. PDF experts at their best.

 

[PakAl]

maybe maybe maybe maybe etc.
you don't know anything about Saudis or the gulf ,all you do is just typing nonsense.

the saudis always want someone who defend them and to use them as cannon fodders , they tried to use us against houthis but we understood it and withdrew our troops , they used the moroccan and houthis shot down a moroccan f-16 and the pilot got killed , they used the sudanese and plenty of them died in yemen etc.

turkey has no experience in wars and will probably get its ass kicked by houthis..

They asked Pakistan to send army aswell but our parliament opposed it, now we are under hybrid regime so all options are open. Saudis pumped Saddam against Iran and after a decade stabbed the same Saddam lol. Good move by Egypt. But keep in mind, if Saudis do ever get attacked Egypt will send army to defend them, petrodollars talk.

 

[Desert]

. But keep in mind, if Saudis do ever get attacked Egypt will send army to defend them, petrodollars talk.

They are currently under attack in Najran.
do you think a saudi 10 billion or 20 billion usd would do egypt good if we got attacked by houthi drones over and over in suez or in our cities ? no. they can keep their billions , we don't want any chaos in Egypt , our economy is fragile.

 

[Desert]

Turkey and Egypt relations broke down because of Turkish support to MB, although recently improving again. The MB under Morsi used to encourage jihad in Syria but Egyptian military opposed this (one of the reason for relationship breakdown), Saudi nearly invaded Qatar due to MB support, only for Turkey intervention which stopped the attack. Today Turkey and Saudia reached compromise and are ruling Syria together. My point was nations interests and policies need to align in order to form military alliances, and hopefully when Egypt Turkey sort out their issues Egypt will also join, same with Kuwait Bahrain Qatar. UAE at the moment is against Islamist but if in the future they change their policies they too will become part of this defence treaty. Iran has major issues with Saudia and this is why they are not part of this, if Iran Saudis can sort out their issues then Pakistan Turkey wouldn't oppose this, plus Iran Usa Israel issues need to be sorted out. Some people think this defence treaty is against Israel meanwhile Usa may sell F35s to Turkey and Saudis lol. PDF experts at their best.

I'm anti-sisi since 2012 , i'm the most anti-sisi actually and i'm a morsi supporter.

but I don't want my county to be in alliance with the turks just aiming at attacking iran or any group in the middle east unless this alliance is primarily aimed at defending the middle east against the zionists and their allies.

 

[hyperman]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[PakAl]

They are currently under attack in Najran.
do you think a saudi 10 billion or 20 billion usd would do egypt good if we got attacked by houthi drones over and over in suez or in our cities ? no. they can keep their billions , we don't want any chaos in Egypt , our economy is fragile.

A few missiles and drones is not the attack i am talking about, an attack like what happened to Iraq Syria Libya Yemen, Al Saud is securing their future, they have Usa protection but also now having a 2nd option, to make sure House of Saud is protected.

 

[chinasun]

Qatar, Kuwait, and Egypt would likely welcome this alliance. The UAE may feel some pressure. Hopefully it brings peace to the Middle East and boosts economic cooperation for regional development. As for India calling itself the "third superpower" and Iran the "fourth," they probably won't pay much attention.