Modernising the Bangladesh Air Force: time to turn away from China and Russia

We dont know when J31 development is completed, only 2 prototypes so far being built. KAN is also still being developed and only one prototype so far. I hear the prototype is not flying anymore

While KF21 is already in mass production stage and block 2 development is expected to complete in 2028 inshaAllah.
This is smart course of development or wait for turkish KAAN, meanwhile purchase Hurjet or T50 depending which course you will take.
Either way if you want to ditch russia china those are best options unless western ones with usual strings attached.
 
9 Sep 2024|Khandakar Tahmid Rejwan
Bangladesh_Air_Force_Chengdu_F-7_BG_934_Landing_8174016955-1024x708.jpeg

The Bangladesh Air Force (BAF) needs modernisation. This time, rather than arming itself via Russia and China again, it should look west.

The deposing of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina presents an opportunity for a change of direction. The new government of Muhammad Yunus can modernise the BAF with western equipment. Doing so will strengthen Bangladesh’s long-standing foreign policy of non-alignment. Major BAF weapon systems, such as fighters, utility helicopters and surface-to-air missiles, were made by Russia or China. They are already decades old and have proven unreliable in the field.

Since independence in 1971, Bangladesh has stressed its principle of non-alignment. In maintaining this stance, Dhaka should be careful about Beijing’s and Moscow’s attempts to co-opt developing nations for their strategic advantage. To maintain neutrality, Bangladesh must strike a balance by also turning westward, curtailing over-reliance on Russia and China.

The dependence of Bangladesh’s neighbour Myanmar on China and of India on Russia are further reasons for Bangladesh to seek the superior equipment from the West.

Dhaka already faces tremendous challenges in executing its guiding modernisation program, ‘Forces Goal 2030’. It was offered as a solution to the BAF’s inability to operate modern aircraft, the risks to personnel lives from the existing systems and the need to enforce Bangladesh’s sovereign air space. It also aimed at bringing diversity to the armoury with NATO equipment, but it is likely that it will fall short of this goal.

According to a 1999 RAND report, some developing countries buy Chinese weapons because the equipment is ‘cheap and available’. The same can be said about Russian arms sales. And both of those countries also try to achieve strategic influence over a developing nation by providing broad access to their designs.

The BAF has had to pay a hefty price for this compromise. Four of the 16 Russian Yak-130 fighter-trainers crashed in less than a decade, in one case resulting in the death of the pilot. A pilot ‘went missing’ and was never found when a F-7MB newly acquired from China crashed in the Bay of Bengal in 2015. It has become normal for Chinese-made fighters and basic trainers like K-8 or PT-6 to crash due to malfunctions.

Dhaka should start procuring high-end systems, such as multi-role combat aircraft from reliable and efficient western suppliers. Potential partners include European countries, which make such fighters as the Rafale, Typhoon and Gripen. Though not strictly Western, Japan and South Korea could supply other types of aircraft.

All these states share warm bilateral ties with Bangladesh. Britain and the US perform joint exercises with Bangladesh and pay reciprocal visits. Because of these ties, the BAF’s personnel would welcome the introduction of Western equipment.

The West was critical of Hasina’s blind eye to eroding democratic values and her rigged re-election campaign. Consequently, defence ties were not deepened during her second tenure from 2009 to 2024. That was another reason for Hasina preferring to buy from Beijing and Moscow.

There are also military-technical reasons for the BAF to look to the west in its attempts to modernise. The war in Ukraine has become a graveyard of the Russian military-industrial complex. The sheer amount of Russian hardware lost against a much smaller army is shocking. Chinese systems are predominantly based off on Russian systems and are not battle-tested, as China has not seen an active combat situation since 1979.

Bangladesh’s change of government opens an opportunity to buy from democratic countries that will no longer hesitate in dealing with it as an autocracy. It’s a chance that should be seized.


Author
Khandakar Tahmid Rejwan is a research data analyst at the Bangladesh Peace Observatory-Centre for Alternatives.
My honest suggestion to BD will be to acquire Indian (low quality) weapons but not western.
 
Meteor for BVR and IRIS-T for WVR missile

SK is developing missile as well, the one that is already tested is for A2G


Under development


Indonesian Aerospace is also expected to be able to integrate more weapon variation for IFX version

1726126906765.jpeg

Regarding Efficiency and Effectiveness, Safran Group also guarantees the compatibility of AASM-HAMMER on the T-50 and KFX/IFX aircraft jointly manufactured by PTDI and KAI and hopes that it can be installed as part of the Rafale Fighter Jet armament.


Maybe Turkish missile as well

 
This is hilarious!

BD which does not have money wants to buy a fighter jet which no one knows when will be completed or if it will be completed.


Err, no-one is saying BAF will buy anything now.

2027-2028 is a more realistic date and China is rapidly developing the J-35 for PLAAN and J-31 for export.

At this time BD should buy some MRSAM to provide some decent air defence capability and that is within BD budget constraints.
 
To my knowledge the above engines is for 4th gen. Can it supercruise?
Dont know, some said it does supercruise when the prototype exceed sound barrier during test flight, but I dont know the detail and even I have connection to the IFX team, I would not ask this and reveal in this openl forum.

F414 that is for KF21 is the enhance version, latest version, I dont know abouth engine though
 
Dont know, some said it does supercruise when the prototype exceed sound barrier during test flight, but I dont know the detail and even I have connection to the IFX team, I would not ask this and reveal in this openl forum.

F414 that is for KF21 is the enhance version, latest version, I dont know abouth engine though
The video when KF21 exceed sound barrier is open knowledge already, people can see it and analyse it whether the plane uses afterburner or not, from the video it doesnt look like it uses afterburner at all
 
The video when KF21 exceed sound barrier is open knowledge already, people can see it and analyse it whether the plane uses afterburner or not, from the video it doesnt look like it uses afterburner at all


F414 is 4.5 generation engine and so two on a fighter like KF-21 will allow supercruise at Mach 1.4-1.5.
Eurofighter with similar engine and weight can supercruise at Mach 1.5.
 
F414 is 4.5 generation engine and so two on a fighter like KF-21 will allow supercruise at Mach 1.4-1.5.
Eurofighter with similar engine and weight can supercruise at Mach 1.5.
Ya it also depend on the plane design and inlet design as well. KF21 is more aerodinamic than F35 when we see the design
 
Ya it also depend on the plane design and inlet design as well. KF21 is more aerodinamic than F35 when we see the design


Yes of course but remember that KF-21 eventually will not have the drag of carrying its AAMs externally as the Eurofighter has to do.

Eurofighter does minimise by "semi-recess" method that the missiles do still add to the drag of the plane, whereas KF-21 will not have this problem as it can carry its missiles internally with the KF-21EX.
 
Yes of course but remember that KF-21 eventually will not have the drag of carrying its AAMs externally as the Eurofighter has to do.

Eurofighter does minimise by "semi-recess" method that the missiles do still add to the drag of the plane, whereas KF-21 will not have this problem as it can carry its missiles internally with the KF-21EX.
KF21 test flight always use 4 dummy meteor missiles in its belly.

KF21 is able to minimize much drag with its design. I dont see Eurofighter have semi recessed weapon bay like KF21.

KF21 program still has two options, first is making IWB and the other uses the IWB space for electronic device to control wingman drone. The drone will be Stealthy design and has IWB

I Think the second route will likely be picked. It will cost much less than the first option while it can have good Stealth as well
 
JF17 Block III would be perhaps a better option for Bangladesh
bought thru China

Having local production is the way forward for 150-200 units


Rafale = Too expensive
Gripen = Bit Expensive
JF17 Block III = Ideal balance between performance and Budget

Sale of 150-200 units would also replenish the Air-force Budget in Pakistan

Delivery rate is also quite reasonable

I think you have to build a good foundation of airforce

JF-17 would be an excellent way for BD to kickstart homegrown Aircraft Industry.

I have always wondered why this aircraft havent been considered by BD already from a decade ago. Obviously the previous India-friendly government was a huge factor.
 
If we go for a single engine fighter, it would be J10C. (Equipped with PL-15E) It was shown in BAF MHD-2024 poster. JF-17 isn't gonna do very well against our adversaries.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top