New classified F-22 Sensors Could Help Extend the Raptor’s Service Life

F-22Raptor

Elite Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
21,038
Reaction score
24,108
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
The Air Force is successfully testing a number of classified sensor systems on the F-22 with technology that will be applicable to the Next-Generation Air Dominance system, officials said. The new technology could also extend the Raptor’s service life.

“The F-22 team is working really hard on executing a modernization roadmap to field advanced sensors, connectivity, weapons, and other capabilities,” Air Force fighters and advanced aircraft program executive officer Brig. Gen. Jason D. Voorheis told reporters last month at the Life Cycle Industry Days conference in Dayton, Ohio.

“The Raptor team recently conducted six flight test efforts to demo advanced sensors,” Voorheis said, and the service is planning a rapid prototyping effort to get them on the jet, he said.

“We’re executing that successfully, and that will lead to … a rapid fielding [Middle Tier of Acqusition program] in the near future,” Voorheis said.

Service officials have said that slender, chisel-like pods seen on a test F-22 last year are advanced infrared search-and-track (IRST) systems—which may include other sensors—that will expand the F-22’s ability to detect low-observable aircraft. The Air Force’s fiscal 2025 budget request for the F-22 describes ongoing test efforts with IRST. It’s part of an F-22 improvement campaign that calls for $7.8 billion in investments—$3.1 billion for research and development and $4.7 billion in procurement—before 2030.

Several years ago, Air Force leaders said the F-22 would likely retire around 2030. In recent months, however, officials have walked that back, and Voorheis said “from an F-22 sunsetting perspective, I don’t have a date for you.”

“What I can tell you is that we are hyper-focused on modernization to sustain that air superiority combat capability for a highly contested environment for as long as necessary,” he added.

That’s a notable shift from 2021, when then-Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. revealed his “4+1” fighter plan that called for the F-22 to be supplanted by NGAD circa 2030, while retaining the F-35, F-15E and EX, and F-16. The “plus 1” was the A-10, but in March 2023, Brown said the A-10s were being divested faster than expected and will probably be all retired by 2030.

The F-22’s planned 2030 retirement raised eyebrows when Brown revealed the fighter plan, as the type is expected to have sufficient structural life to last into the 2040s. Service officials said at the time that the F-22’s 1980s-vintage stealth, though it has been updated, is being overtaken by new sensors in the hands of peer adversaries like China.

Voorheis offered one key to the F-22’s potentially extended longevity: a new government reference architecture compute environment, or “GRACE.” It is an open architecture software which will “enable non-traditional F-22 software” to be installed on the fighter, he said. It will permit “additional processing and pilot interfaces,” he added.

Voorheis is not the only official to suggest the F-22 could stick around longer than expected. In July, Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach, head of Air Combat Command, said he thinks the Air Force should not only retain the F-22, but keep the 32 older Block 20 Raptors the Air Force has twice asked Congress to retire.

The F-22 is “a fantastic aircraft,” Wilsbach said at the time. “We’re actually planning several upgrades to the jet as we speak,” and even those Block 20s that are not up to current standard are valuable for training.

“If we had to—in an emergency—use the Block 20s in a combat situation, they’re very capable,” he said.

Meanwhile, Air Force leaders have started to push back the timeline on the sixth-generation NGAD, long considered the F-22’s successor as the Air Force’s premier air superiority fighter. Wilsbach noted in July that until an NGAD contract is awarded, “there isn’t an F-22 replacement,” and just a few weeks later, Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall announced the service was “taking a pause” on NGAD.

The new technology modernizing the F-22 “supports all future programs,” Voorheis said, such as NGAD. “And we will leverage all of that technology as we go forward, on any platform.”

Collectively, the modernization effort “will ensure the F-22 remains the world’s [premiere] air superiority fighter, and retains that first-look, first-shot, first-kill advantage,” Voorheis said. The F-22 “is our bridge to NGAD,” and the technologies going into the Raptor will port to the NGAD “to ensure our ability to achieve air superiority in the future, highly-contested environment.”
 
Interesting - they figured out a way to get the Raptors unified computer to talk better and get more integrated considering it’s architecture
 
"Generalizations about F-22A Raptor program are misplaced. F-22A has variations and they are not equal. A total of 32 are said to be old but others are modernized. Some are even being used as a test bed for 6th generation fighter components so one can only imagine the capability of these shadow variants."

From here.

"That some F-22A are serving as a test bed for 6th generation fighter components should tell you everything about its architecture allowing integration of new technology."

From here.

Each and every statement in my posts in the other thread are correct but some have fallen for the false tropes created by certain quarters about the US dying and its war machine not working or inferior in comparison to competitors out there.
 
Last edited:
"Generalizations about F-22A Raptor program are misplaced. F-22A has variations and they are not equal. A total of 32 are said to be old but others are modernized. Some are even being used as a test bed for 6th generation fighter components so one can only imagine the capability of these shadow variants."

From here.

"That some F-22A are serving as a test bed for 6th generation fighter components should tell you everything about its architecture allowing integration of new technology."

From here.

Each and every statement in my posts in the other thread are correct but some have fallen for the false tropes created by certain quarters about the US dying and its war machine not working or inferior in comparison to competitors out there.
I don’t think the issue is with the war machine dying but too many bean counters taking the helm.

Boeing was delivering KC-46s with crap in them - the F-35 is going to go down as the most mismanaged and bludgeoned project in history. FFX will be a dead program soon and shipyards are shutting down due to bankruptcy or poor safety and working conditions

There is rot in the pentagon and associated manufacturing and corporate sector and its cost taxpayers trillions of dollars and the warfighters lives. Until we acknowledge that we cannot move forward.

That being said, Red Flag 24-3 is on going - out of 4 held yearly and the countless other exercises that are on providing near battle hardened fighters ready to go - no one does at it at this scale or proficiency.

And regardless of the hype or alarm trash pieces Business Insider and the other churn out and then propaganda on China’s J-20 outnumbering the F-22.., the 1000th Lightening was delivered and it’s almost always conveniently ignored in these fluff pieces. Even with the program flaws the 800 or so F-35 in US service are years ahead of the closest 4.5gen fighter and no other country had a 1000 5th gen platforms flying along with everything else that is in the air, on the ground and at sea.

So Im pretty sure we’re fine for now.
 
I don’t think the issue is with the war machine dying but too many bean counters taking the helm.

Boeing was delivering KC-46s with crap in them - the F-35 is going to go down as the most mismanaged and bludgeoned project in history. FFX will be a dead program soon and shipyards are shutting down due to bankruptcy or poor safety and working conditions

There is rot in the pentagon and associated manufacturing and corporate sector and its cost taxpayers trillions of dollars and the warfighters lives. Until we acknowledge that we cannot move forward.

That being said, Red Flag 24-3 is on going - out of 4 held yearly and the countless other exercises that are on providing near battle hardened fighters ready to go - no one does at it at this scale or proficiency.

And regardless of the hype or alarm trash pieces Business Insider and the other churn out and then propaganda on China’s J-20 outnumbering the F-22.., the 1000th Lightening was delivered and it’s almost always conveniently ignored in these fluff pieces. Even with the program flaws the 800 or so F-35 in US service are years ahead of the closest 4.5gen fighter and no other country had a 1000 5th gen platforms flying along with everything else that is in the air, on the ground and at sea.

So Im pretty sure we’re fine for now.

I've often heard people say that the US industry is dying, the medical industry is shoddy, economy is in the ruins, but thing is, even if their industry is dying or the F-35 program mucked up or Boeing is dropping the ball, a shoddy performance by any US industry is generally far better than the best that the rest of the world puts out.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top