AZADPAKISTAN2009
Elite Member
- Sep 8, 2009
- 39,092
- 41,392
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
For Navy testing with Live Ammo is vital , it is good that Navy is shifting towards more locally Produced SAMs
If it is CAM-ER , that is fine as well as long as we can Produce more missiles locally under licence
I think most folks liked CAM-ER for it's reputation seems reasonable option
If we had 32 VLS solution likely a reload would not be needed often but for 16 VLS I would imagine reloading option at port would be needed
Example Training mission might launch 1-2 missiles for testing or may be 4 missiles
Since we now make own Drones , having unlimited Missile ammo would allow Navy to do more training with live Ammo when applicable
FAAZ , if integrated in Navy would be interesting as well always good to have multiple options
But the ships are still under construction to some time is there
If it is CAM-ER , that is fine as well as long as we can Produce more missiles locally under licence
I think most folks liked CAM-ER for it's reputation seems reasonable option
If we had 32 VLS solution likely a reload would not be needed often but for 16 VLS I would imagine reloading option at port would be needed
Example Training mission might launch 1-2 missiles for testing or may be 4 missiles
Since we now make own Drones , having unlimited Missile ammo would allow Navy to do more training with live Ammo when applicable
FAAZ , if integrated in Navy would be interesting as well always good to have multiple options
But the ships are still under construction to some time is there
Last edited: