New Indian movie supports and agitates Tibetan separatism and terrorism

You don’t understand Hinduism. You’re looking at it as an outsider and mistaking its depth for “thousands of different religions.”

Hinduism is not a religion in the narrow, dogmatic sense. It is a shared civilizational identity, a continuous cultural, philosophical, and spiritual framework with common roots, texts, concepts, and historical memory that has bound the Indians together.

The same core philosophies and narratives appear across regions and languages. The Ramayana, whether written in Awadhi or Tamil, remains the Ramayana, the language may change, the essence does not.

Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism are not separate religions outside it; they emerged from within the same civilizational matrix and remain part of that broader Indic continuum.
Eff off with your hindutva bollocks.

Seriously, you continually delude and deceive naive white people all over the world with this "civilizational matrix" rubbish. Mercifully, those who live next door to your qom have understood everything about you that needs to be understood.
 
Eff off with your hindutva bollocks.

Seriously, you continually delude and deceive naive white people all over the world with this "civilizational matrix" rubbish. Mercifully, those who live next door to your qom have understood everything about you that needs to be understood.
We do not include Pakistan in any Hindutva-based civilisational matrix. That is a deliberate and consistent position. Pakistan is a separate political and ideological project that broke away and defined itself in opposition to the civilisational continuum of the subcontinent. Treating it as somehow still inside that matrix is your fantasy, not ours.

Interestingly, the World Bank itself has now classified Pakistan under the Middle East region, a reclassification that was pushed with the involvement of Indian-origin economist Ajay Banga. Even global institutions are recognising what geography, culture, and ideology have long made obvious: Pakistan is not part of the same civilisational continuum.

Your claim that we “delude and deceive naive white people” with talk of a civilisational matrix is just projection.

The people who actually live next door to your qom have indeed understood everything that needs to be understood, which is precisely why the civilisational distinction is drawn so clearly in the first place.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top