New Indian movie supports and agitates Tibetan separatism and terrorism

You don’t understand Hinduism. You’re looking at it as an outsider and mistaking its depth for “thousands of different religions.”

Hinduism is not a religion in the narrow, dogmatic sense. It is a shared civilizational identity, a continuous cultural, philosophical, and spiritual framework with common roots, texts, concepts, and historical memory that has bound the Indians together.

The same core philosophies and narratives appear across regions and languages. The Ramayana, whether written in Awadhi or Tamil, remains the Ramayana, the language may change, the essence does not.

Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism are not separate religions outside it; they emerged from within the same civilizational matrix and remain part of that broader Indic continuum.
Eff off with your hindutva bollocks.

Seriously, you continually delude and deceive naive white people all over the world with this "civilizational matrix" rubbish. Mercifully, those who live next door to your qom have understood everything about you that needs to be understood.
 
Eff off with your hindutva bollocks.

Seriously, you continually delude and deceive naive white people all over the world with this "civilizational matrix" rubbish. Mercifully, those who live next door to your qom have understood everything about you that needs to be understood.
We do not include Pakistan in any Hindutva-based civilisational matrix. That is a deliberate and consistent position. Pakistan is a separate political and ideological project that broke away and defined itself in opposition to the civilisational continuum of the subcontinent. Treating it as somehow still inside that matrix is your fantasy, not ours.

Interestingly, the World Bank itself has now classified Pakistan under the Middle East region, a reclassification that was pushed with the involvement of Indian-origin economist Ajay Banga. Even global institutions are recognising what geography, culture, and ideology have long made obvious: Pakistan is not part of the same civilisational continuum.

Your claim that we “delude and deceive naive white people” with talk of a civilisational matrix is just projection.

The people who actually live next door to your qom have indeed understood everything that needs to be understood, which is precisely why the civilisational distinction is drawn so clearly in the first place.
 
Interestingly, the World Bank itself has now classified Pakistan under the Middle East region, a reclassification that was pushed with the involvement of Indian-origin economist Ajay Banga. Even global institutions are recognising what geography, culture, and ideology have long made obvious: Pakistan is not part of the same civilisational continuum.

The World Bank's official website says it classifies economies in three ways:
1)Income groups
2)Geographic regions
3)Operational lending categories

The World Bank clearly states that its geographic regions are primarily based on regions used for administrative purposes. There is no mention of shared culture, civilization, or ideology as a classification criterion.

▼▼▼ Look at the examples:
◉ China and Australia are both in 「East Asia and Pacific」. Do they belong to the same civilization?.... :oops:
◉ Malta has Roman Catholicism as its state religion under the Constitution and is an EU member, yet it is placed in the 「Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan and Pakistan (MENAAP)」 region..... :unsure:

Unless you can provide an official World Bank statement that supports your interpretation, you are reading a political and civilizational meaning into what is explicitly an administrative classification.......
 
Post some photos of the Dalai Lama with Shoko Asahara, the leader of the Japanese cult Aum Shinrikyo.....▼▼▼




007.jpeg

009.jpg

011.jpg

020.jpg

006.jpg










Matsumoto sarin attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matsumoto_sarin_attack

The Matsumoto sarin attack was an attempted assassination perpetrated by members of the Aum Shinrikyo doomsday cult in Matsumoto, Nagano Prefecture, Japan, on the night of June 27, 1994. Eight people were killed and more than 500 were harmed by sarin aerosol that was released from a converted refrigerator truck in the Kaichi Heights area. The attack was perpetrated nine months before the better-known Tokyo subway sarin attack.









Tokyo subway sarin attack​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_subway_sarin_attack

The Tokyo subway sarin attack (Japanese: 地下鉄サリン事件, Hepburn: Chikatetsu sarin jiken; lit. 'subway sarin incident') was a domestic chemical terrorist attack perpetrated on 20 March 1995, in Tokyo, Japan, by members of the Aum Shinrikyo cult. In five coordinated attacks, the perpetrators released sarin, a nerve agent, on three lines of the Tokyo Metro (then Teito Rapid Transit Authority) during rush hour, killing 14 people, severely injuring 50 (some of whom later died), and causing temporary vision problems for nearly 1,000 others. The attack was directed against trains passing through Kasumigaseki and Nagatachō, where the National Diet (Japanese parliament) is headquartered in Tokyo.

The group, led by Shoko Asahara, had already carried out several assassinations and terrorist attacks using sarin, including the Matsumoto sarin attack nine months earlier. They had also produced several other nerve agents, including VX for assassination attempts, and attempted to produce Bacillus anthracis and botulinum toxin for bioterrorism. Asahara had been made aware of a police raid scheduled for 22 March and had planned the Tokyo subway attack in order to hinder police investigations into the cult and perhaps spark the apocalypse the leader of the group had prophesied.

In the raid following the attack, police arrested many senior members of the cult. Police activity continued throughout the summer, and over 200 members were arrested, including Asahara. Thirteen of the senior Aum management, including Asahara himself, were sentenced to death and later executed; many others were given prison sentences up to life. As of 2026 the attack remains the deadliest modern incident defined as terrorism in Japan.
 
Last edited:
In 1942, India gained independence with the support of China and the US. It was established by the British colonial governor. Subsequently, it inherited the British colonial expansion policy and implemented the "forward policy".But unfortunately, India has forgotten this. Even Britain in the 19th century failed to do so.

Original text:

Exchange of views between Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and President Roosevelt regarding situation in India

[Following a visit by Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek to India in February 1942, he communicated directly to President Roosevelt and also to the American Ambassador in China his views as to the critical political and military situation in India and the urgent need for British action to solve the political problem. He quoted instructions to the Chinese Ambassador in London to present these views to Prime Minister Churchill. On July 25, 1942, Generalissimo Chiang sent another urgent confidential message on the Indian situation to President Roosevelt urging that the United States should advise both Britain and India to seek a reasonable and satisfactory solution. President Roosevelt telegraphed the text of this message to Prime Minister Churchill, asking him for suggestions as to a reply. The Prime Minister replied that the British Government did not believe Chiang’s estimate of the situation correct and expressed the desire that Chiang be persuaded to cease activities as to India and that Roosevelt should not permit pressure to be put on the British Government. President Roosevelt then informed Chiang of British opposition to suggestions from other members of the United Nations as to India and added that under the circumstances it would be wiser for Chiang and himself not to take the mediatory action Chiang, had proposed.

The correspondence referred to above is not printed in this volume but is reserved for publication with other papers regarding India in the regular annual volumes for 1942.]
 
Last edited:
We do not include Pakistan in any Hindutva-based civilisational matrix. That is a deliberate and consistent position. Pakistan is a separate political and ideological project that broke away and defined itself in opposition to the civilisational continuum of the subcontinent. Treating it as somehow still inside that matrix is your fantasy, not ours.

Interestingly, the World Bank itself has now classified Pakistan under the Middle East region, a reclassification that was pushed with the involvement of Indian-origin economist Ajay Banga. Even global institutions are recognising what geography, culture, and ideology have long made obvious: Pakistan is not part of the same civilisational continuum.

Your claim that we “delude and deceive naive white people” with talk of a civilisational matrix is just projection.

The people who actually live next door to your qom have indeed understood everything that needs to be understood, which is precisely why the civilisational distinction is drawn so clearly in the first place.
I never said Pakistan was part of this "civilizational matrix". I simply said it is a load of bollocks designed to obfuscate the actual colonialist tendencies of the hindutva movement.

That you have physically expanded your borders in certain places beyond that which was bequeathed to you by the British in 1947, in the name of this supposed "matrix", stands as testament to this fact. The Secular Republic of India is a colonial and imperialistic national entity that has simply picked up where the British left off, replacing the British elite class with an upper caste bourgeoisie, and furthermore, masquerades as several different things on different days of the week.

You redefine and modulate what Hinduism is and what it isn't in order to satisfy these expansionist urges.

As I said, your neighbours (including China, Pakistan, and others) know you well. We could easily give lengthy Ted talks to countless innocent and naive white millennial folk on this matter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top