New York poised for first South Asian - origin and Muslim mayor as Cuomo concedes to Mamdani

If that was the only solution, you would have a less vibrant city. It’s not about me personally, but our generation and those to come afterwards. It has to be more affordable to keep talent in the city.
I do not give a f*** whether New York or SF are vibrant cities. The rest of America is not going to pay for it
 
Child care workers are paid minimum wage. Moving somewhere else is usually a privilege, not something a common person can do easily.
Logic 101: Childcare is expensive. Childcare workers are paid minimum wage,. Draw your own conclusions
 
I do not give a f*** whether New York or SF are vibrant cities. The rest of America is not going to pay for it
Actually even New Yorkers won't pay for it. Pretty soon, much of the pricey Manhattan real estate is going to be owned by Russian, Chinese, Arab and Indian billionaires. Even US-based homeowners will just establish their tax home someplace else where the taxes aren't so ridiculous.
 
Many wealthy are single for a lot longer. Many are single again, after short marriages.

It is easy these days for the single wealthy men to get females. They do not have to marry and risk half of their wealth
 
I do not give a f*** whether New York or SF are vibrant cities. The rest of America is not going to pay for it
The rest of the country benefits off New York more than what New York benefits from the country. It’s about taxing businesses within New York, not about asking the feds for more than we are getting already.

The wealthy care that New York is vibrant; more for them to enjoy. Lowering the cost of living by changing codes to allow the building of more housing should lower the rents and allow workers to be able to afford to live in New York on their current salaries, lowering the burden on most private employers to raise wages.
 
It is easy these days for the single wealthy men to get females. They do not have to marry and risk half of their wealth
So why wouldn’t these men want to stay in New York, where they have access to the largest pool of potential partners in the country.
 
The rest of the country benefits off New York more than what New York benefits from the country. It’s about taxing businesses within New York, not about asking the feds for more than we are getting already.

The wealthy care that New York is vibrant; more for them to enjoy. Lowering the cost of living by changing codes to allow the building of more housing should lower the rents and allow workers to be able to afford to live in New York on their current salaries, lowering the burden on most private employers to raise wages.

Tell me what does New York exactly produce. You are not going to claim Nvidia's output just because it is listed on the NASDAQ
 
So why wouldn’t these men want to stay in New York, where they have access to the largest pool of potential partners in the country.
Southern Florida, Los Angeles have huge supplies of potential partners
 
The wealthy care that New York is vibrant; more for them to enjoy.
NYC is very heterogeneous. The wealthy dont care about NYC outside a few boroughs in Manhattan and maybe Staten Island. There are parts of Queens and the Bronx where a wealthy white person without security has a 99% probability of getting mugged or worse.
 
Tell me what does New York exactly produce. You are not going to claim Nvidia's output just because it is listed on the NASDAQ
Ask google:

“finance, healthcare, professional services, retail trade, and manufacturing. NYC is a major hub for professional, scientific, and technical services, including legal, accounting, engineering, scientific research, and management consulting.“

Btw, being a place where innovation and fostering talent is what the city is aiming for, similar to California. This is why tech, especially in fields mentioned above, is important for New York’s growth, and why a vibrant city is valuable. Attract talent and hold on to them.

Btw, many “young” (under 40) people call Manhattan (the city part of New York City); “Work Island”. The jobs are there, and with many staying single and not having kids, living in the other boroughs or possibly just over the river in New Jersey, in a small apartment is the right fit. These neighborhoods are where the money is spreading out to all parts of the city, and hence why middle class live all over the city, while many wealthy follow, to live in vibrant neighborhoods these middle class young people have built up to the living standard the wealthy want.

New York’s future is not in being a race the bottom for the cheapest housing as in the 70s, but a rise as a premium location, with enough space for the middle class and working class people that service the wealthy and the innovators and tourists. A vibrant city allows the city to be diversified and resilient in an economic downturn, because top talent is available to work in new businesses at affordable labor costs.

 
Last edited:
NYC is very heterogeneous. The wealthy dont care about NYC outside a few boroughs in Manhattan and maybe Staten Island. There are parts of Queens and the Bronx where a wealthy white person without security has a 99% probability of getting mugged or worse.
This isn’t the early 90s. Many wealthy people live in each and every borough. Specific parts of each borough, but in every borough. Also, The risk of mugging is exaggerated.
 
This isn’t the early 90s. Many wealthy people live in each and every borough. Specific parts of each borough, but in every borough. Also, The risk of mugging is exaggerated.
Maybe some people with families or businesses in the Bronx , Queens or Brooklyn who have come into money continue to live there, but no one without previous ties and budget constraints would choose any neighborhood there over the nicer parts of Manhattan-certainly not the centi-millionaires and billionaires Zohrani is targeting with his income tax hikes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top