Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

Successful Operation by Security Forces - 🔺Watch 📸📽

🔺On 5 March 26, information was recieved that Fitna Al Hindustan established a Nakka at Pattak city.

Combat teams were despatched to engage FAH terrorists. A fire fight started between security forces and Fitna Al Hindustan terrorists.

3 x FAH terrorists were killed while 7 x were injured.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
313Ghazi said:
Of course how were strategic planners ever to know that Pakistan could face a situation where fuel supply could be threatened.
Click to expand...
multiple sources have confirmed we have 25 to 28 days of fuel , these are just precautions to conserve fuel incase this war lasts longer
 
HAIDER said:
sir ya chala ga ?

www.lowyinstitute.org

Pakistan’s Pasni port pitch to Washington can reshape regional rivalries with China and India | Lowy Institute

Minerals over missiles – at least, that’s the message Islamabad is sending.
www.lowyinstitute.org www.lowyinstitute.org
Click to expand...
Smart foreign policy.

One port developed in partnership with China. One port developed in partnership with the US.

Strengthen diplomatic and economic relations with two of the most powerful and wealthiest nations on Earth.
 
Drone Sector: Pakistan targeted and destroyed Taliban posts and formations.

A large number of Afghan Taliban fighters were killed.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
HAIDER said:
For all type of concerns please contact China.
Click to expand...
Chinese are not as narrow minded as some Pakistanis. I am sure Pakistan is trying to attract American investment not without taking Chinese into confidence.

Pakistan has the potential to become a trade route and there is competition in trade, not rivalaries/fighting.
 
muz said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

?
Click to expand...

thts difficult to accept as it would mean that either there is a high level mole or many lower to mid level moles or the match is fixed at the top. I have heard some chatter on the later but I would only take it as conspiracy theory.

Now the targets so far have not hit the spine of whatever economy Afghanistan has. if pak wants to send Afghan to pre- 1990 economy then all it needs to do is take out five substation and about 50% of electricity circuit is done..
1. Daman substation at Kandhar
2. Pul-e-khumri substation in Baghlan
3. Nooral jihad substation in Herat
4. pul-e-charkhi substation in Kabul
5. Chimtala substation in Kabul
You take out the above and the whole electrical network is a mess that may require a yr to bring back up.

However, this will set a precedent that will adversely affect us more than Afghanistan. We have far more targets and far higher number of Afghan moles hidden across the country to open this can of worms.
Hence the focus so far has been on arsenal depots and HVT
 
Last edited:
gamaji said:
Chinese are not as narrow minded as some Pakistanis. I am sure Pakistan is trying to attract American investment not without taking Chinese into confidence.

Pakistan has the potential to become a trade route and there is competition in trade, not rivalaries/fighting.
Click to expand...
Positive thinking , but super power interest doesn't revolve around Pakistan economic policy. isn't it !!! ...when you walk on narrow path full of yucca ....
 
HAIDER said:
Positive thinking , but super power interest doesn't revolve around Pakistan economic policy. isn't it !!! ...when you walk on narrow path full of yucca ....
Click to expand...
You take bold decisions and take risks. Nothing to worry about.

Pakistan can involve and engage most, if not all, world powers in a constructive manner.
 
Vapnope said:
I wanna know your understanding of why we couldnt build strategic reserves?
Click to expand...
Ive always assumed its because we've never spent the money to do so? I mean it cant be that expensive can it?

If you know I'd love to know the answer. Google has suggested the UK has a minimum 90 days, although Australia has 30 days. Apparently 90 days is EU standard.

I always have a conservative approach to such matters, always been cautious.

Imo a household should have a minimum 3 months worth of bills in an emergency fund, before they consider themselves as having any savings
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I really get the feeling the tempo here is very slow... airstrikes against critical targets are very spaced out and after a week supposedly only 30% of NATO military left-overs are destroyed.

I'm not sure how comprehensive the target list is, does it include every kind of military hardware and infrastructure or only specific ones?

But right now it feels like reactive strikes every time there are clashes on the border, the tempo should be higher and target list more comprehensive - get rid of all military bases and conventional weapons.

The information coming out is also limited apart from certain strikes.

@hasssanali8998 @Panzerkiel What do you think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top