Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

[Signalian]

They are within Pakistan and its what I said about pushing them back from within Pakistan into Afghanistan. That is Part I.

Part II is dealing with their sympathizers.

 

[RAJPUT]

napalm cluster bombs etc their crop fields and see how they respond without food

Do not suggest straight up war crimes and anti-Islamic crimes against humanity.
War also has rules that we must follow, cuz if we don't, what's the difference between them and us?

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Pakistan getting tough on Af Taliban; May shift conflict beyond Afghan borders; No talk no engagment​

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Do not suggest straight up war crimes and anti-Islamic crimes against humanity.
War also has rules that we must follow, cuz if we don't, what's the difference between them and us?

Rules of Engagement are for external enemies. As for internal Ihanet, only solution is Infaz...

Please note: the Muslimin and Munafikin come together. And, the Munafikin take up arms against a Muslim state on behalf of the Kuffar enemies. Thus, they turn into Murtedin whose Katl becomes Wajib for the Beka-i Devlet...

*If the slightest indication of Ihnaet was found even amongst the Shahzades in the Ottoman Empire they used to get immediately executed. For a reason no Kuffar could touch even a single strand of hair of the folks in the Muslim heartlands.
**Ruling over a Muslim country is 100 times more difficult than ruling over a non-Muslim country. Muslims and non-Muslims are like oil and milk. When oil `gets adulterated it turns into poison (it kills). When milk gets adulterated it turns into cream, yogurt etc. (still useful).

 

[Asif]

Pakistan getting tough on Af Taliban; May shift conflict beyond Afghan borders; No talk no engagment​

اینٹ کا جواب پتھر سے
thats a term (replying to a brick with a stone) usually used for a reply to a tyrant, a bully... to someone who is bigger, stronger or more influential than you.
This doesn't apply to afghanistan..

we should reply every brick with a mountain ... every bomb shud gave a human, economic and cost to daily life. These ppl heed to nothing else

 

[Blain2]

This has risks but Pakistan has been taking the Taliban attacks on the back-foot. Defending against terrorists the Afghans send. I think the right answer is to hit their military/government targets inside Afghanistan when attacks are carried out by ANY terrorist elements in KPK/Balochistan.

Even if they feign ignorance to the attackers carrying out terrorism in Pakistan, the impact of the hurt inflicted will result is some serious cost-benefit analysis. QPQ+ has to be the answer to their abetment of TTP/BLA.

Also, when these border skirmishes happen, I think Pakistan should respond with an over-match instead of carrying out dueling fire. At each step, Afghans should have to bear the heavier cost militarily and economically.

 

[Distant_Observer]

This has risks but Pakistan has been taking the Taliban attacks on the back-foot. Defending against terrorists the Afghans send. I think the right answer is to hit their military/government targets inside Afghanistan when attacks are carried out by ANY terrorist elements in KPK/Balochistan.

Even if they feign ignorance to the attackers carrying out terrorism in Pakistan, the impact of the hurt inflicted will result is some serious cost-benefit analysis. QPQ+ has to be the answer to their abetment of TTP/BLA.

Also, when these border skirmishes happen, I think Pakistan should respond with an over-match instead of carrying out dueling fire. At each step, Afghans should have to bear the heavier cost militarily and economically.

There needs to be a 3 month long sustained campaign of sorties being dropped daily to completely and utterly dismantle all TTP and BLA leadership, infrastructure, storage facilities and cave/tunnel complexes.