Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

.

Top Beneficiary from USAID

Below, we show the top beneficiaries of U.S. foreign aid in 2024, highlighting the prevalence of countries facing deadly conflict and violence:
1Ukraine$6.1B
2DRC$1.3B
3Jordan$1.3B
4Ethiopia$1.2B
5West Bank and Gaza$918M
6Sudan$769M
7Nigeria$763M
8Yemen$753M
9Afghanistan$743M
10South Sudan$727M
[th width="15.4065%"]
Rank​
[/th][th width="41.5122%"]
Country​
[/th][th]
Aid Provided in 2024​
[/th]​

Figures represent foreign assistance from the U.S. Agency for International Development.
In January 2025, the Trump administration abruptly froze nearly all U.S. foreign aid to conduct a 90-day review to ensure they align with his new America-centered policies.
 
Services of so-called Afghan refugees to Khoraj and the Baloch enemy BLA

In recent days, BLA and TTP have intensified attacks on innocent people in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Ever wondered why?

The main reason for this is the advanced weapons being transported from Afghanistan to the BLA through the TTP, and all of this is obviously happening with the approval of the Afghan Taliban.

But how are these weapons reaching Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa? The same Afghan refugees who were given shelter in Pakistan on humanitarian grounds are being used to smuggle the weapons.

Not only do Afghans need to be deported, but the use of force has become necessary.
 
The biggest obstacle standing in the way of Better relations with Afghanistan is the fact it fails to recognize the existence of Pakistan after nearly 80 years and insists on irredentism that will get itself nuked one day. Everything thing else is a symptom of that and not the main cause.

Pakistan has wasted nearly 80 years and paid a heavy price, not as heavy as Afghanistan but heavy price for Kabul's ethno nationalist utopian dreams, and it will pay an even bigger if continue to not realize the actual problem and deal with it in a way backed by a grand national consensus.
 
The biggest obstacle standing in the way of Better relations with Afghanistan is the fact it fails to recognize the existence of Pakistan after nearly 80 years and insists on irredentism that will get itself nuked one day. Everything thing else is a symptom of that and not the main cause.

Pakistan has wasted nearly 80 years and paid a heavy price, not as heavy as Afghanistan but heavy price for Kabul's ethno nationalist utopian dreams, and it will pay an even bigger if continue to not realize the actual problem and deal with it in a way backed by a grand national consensus.

True

Except for the national consensus part, Pakistan must start acting like a state
Pakistan doesn't have any more time pandering to the fassad or threat of fassad to biased populations to whom ethnocentrism is more important then the country
 
True

Except for the national consensus part, Pakistan must start acting like a state
Pakistan doesn't have any more time pandering to the fassad or threat of fassad to biased populations to whom ethnocentrism is more important then the country
Nope. The population IS the country. Pakistan is a federal state with no political party managing even close to the 50% of seats in the parliament let alone 50% of the votes which is ten times more difficult.

Hence Minority govt edicts won't work, especially by gerrymandering seats and imposing will of parties based on the other side of the country to decide fate of people they have nil support in.

And if you or federal authority, which is Punjab led right now, thinks that the majority of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and it's political leadership won't stand up for Pakistan's sovereignty, then isn't that an admission that Pakistan is occupying Pakhtunkhwa? Isn't this insinuation in itself treasonous?
 
Nope. The population IS the country. Pakistan is a federal state with no political party managing even close to the 50% of seats in the parliament let alone 50% of the votes which is ten times more difficult.

Hence Minority govt edicts won't work, especially by gerrymandering seats and imposing will of parties based on the other side of the country to decide fate of people they have nil support in.

And if you or federal authority, which is Punjab led right now, thinks that the majority of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and it's political leadership won't stand up for Pakistan's sovereignty, then isn't that an admission that Pakistan is occupying Pakhtunkhwa? Isn't this insinuation in itself treasonous?

We haven't got time for word play

Because of ethnocentric considerations we have gone soft very very soft on the enemies of Pakistan for fear of making populations bent out of shape

We can't waste time doing that anymore, seal the border
Throw out every last Afghan and don't give citizenship to any
Review I.D cards with immediate deportations of those with illegally made I.D cards at any point in the last 50 years

Arrest and jail any individual or group providing support to terrorists and spreading propaganda

We have a nation of 250 million to look after and we just don't have the time to go easy on our enemies
 
We haven't got time for word play

Because of ethnocentric considerations we have gone soft very very soft on the enemies of Pakistan for fear of making populations bent out of shape

We can't waste time doing that anymore, seal the border
Throw out every last Afghan and don't give citizenship to any
Review I.D cards with immediate deportations of those with illegally made I.D cards at any point in the last 50 years

Arrest and jail any individual or group providing support to terrorists and spreading propaganda

We have a nation of 250 million to look after and we just don't have the time to go easy on our enemies
The state of Pakistan has made no such considerations you have dreamt up. It's the incompetence.

For example, back in 2023, when afghans were deported by Kakar govt, cruelty theatre was chosen over efficiency. Hundreds of thousands of migrants were forced into one narrow valley (Torkham) with one road on a one week period. Torkham barely fits the daily commuters and truck let alone this torrent of people. Why? Because the state of Pakistan was more interested in looking like it is doing something than actually doing something. (trump is doing the same thing with migrants in chains theatre).

Total 800k were deported (till now) and within months of initial deportations there were DW report of deportees building back their mud houses in Islamabad again. So what was all that theatre for? How many are actually deported? Is this what you call ethnocentric considerations? Sounds like incompetence to me.

I agree with your proposals for even though they are a separate topic, but no one is willing to believe anymore that the state of Pakistan is serious in implementing them anyway. Whether that be afghan deportations which they good money on later by allowing those same people back in, or military operations which have had its own dollars attached to it over the last two decades of American WOT.

That's why as i said, a consensus is necessary to deal with Afghanistan irredentist tendencies and it won't take long anyway. But to think a 20 grade officers from far off lands can impose his latest whims and wishes and get political and public support which are paramount to any long-standing policy, is a fools dream. Mush tried that with his WOT, how did it work out?
 
The state of Pakistan has made no such considerations you have dreamt up. It's the incompetence.

For example, back in 2023, when afghans were deported by Kakar govt, cruelty theatre was chosen over efficiency. Hundreds of thousands of migrants were forced into one narrow valley (Torkham) with one road on a one week period. Torkham barely fits the daily commuters and truck let alone this torrent of people. Why? Because the state of Pakistan was more interested in looking like it is doing something than actually doing something. (trump is doing the same thing with migrants in chains theatre).

Total 800k were deported (till now) and within months of initial deportations there were DW report of deportees building back their mud houses in Islamabad again. So what was all that theatre for? How many are actually deported? Is this what you call ethnocentric considerations? Sounds like incompetence to me.

I agree with your proposals for even though they are a separate topic, but no one is willing to believe anymore that the state of Pakistan is serious in implementing them anyway. Whether that be afghan deportations which they good money on later by allowing those same people back in, or military operations which have had its own dollars attached to it over the last two decades of American WOT.

That's why as i said, a consensus is necessary to deal with Afghanistan irredentist tendencies and it won't take long anyway. But to think a 20 grade officers from far off lands can impose his latest whims and wishes and get political and public support which are paramount to any long-standing policy, is a fools dream. Mush tried that with his WOT, how did it work out?

That was a reaction, an act of frustration at the Taliban's lack of interest in dealing with TTP and space for Baloch rebels.

Call it what you like but to me that is essentially a declaration of war. Regardless the chain of events leading up to this.

Rushed deportations, so what they are illegals. Come back with a visa.

I know what deep state uncles are trying. They are hoping in time they will come around and reclaim their borders after not feeling desperate for cash anymore. I hope I am wrong but the average IQ there could be 70 so might not be possible.

I still don't understand why Pakistan doesn't have solid borders. All I see his some mesh. Where are the big solid concrete walls?
 
.

Top Beneficiary from USAID

Below, we show the top beneficiaries of U.S. foreign aid in 2024, highlighting the prevalence of countries facing deadly conflict and violence:

1Ukraine$6.1B
2DRC$1.3B
3Jordan$1.3B
4Ethiopia$1.2B
5West Bank and Gaza$918M
6Sudan$769M
7Nigeria$763M
8Yemen$753M
9Afghanistan$743M
10South Sudan$727M

[th width="15.4065%"]
Rank

[/th][th width="41.5122%"]
Country

[/th][th]
Aid Provided in 2024

[/th]​


Figures represent foreign assistance from the U.S. Agency for International Development.
In January 2025, the Trump administration abruptly froze nearly all U.S. foreign aid to conduct a 90-day review to ensure they align with his new America-centered policies.
I posted many links to this reality and da harami talibunny supporters here gone quiet.

CIA k bhattay per qaim Islami Emirate of jahils.

The bastards here who vocally back talibunny also back Daesh in Syria/ Iraq.......
 
That was a reaction, an act of frustration at the Taliban's lack of interest in dealing with TTP and space for Baloch rebels.

Call it what you like but to me that is essentially a declaration of war. Regardless the chain of events leading up to this.

Rushed deportations, so what they are illegals. Come back with a visa.

I know what deep state uncles are trying. They are hoping in time they will come around and reclaim their borders after not feeling desperate for cash anymore. I hope I am wrong but the average IQ there could be 70 so might not be possible.

I still don't understand why Pakistan doesn't have solid borders. All I see his some mesh. Where are the big solid concrete walls?
Comeback with a visa yes, so who let them come back without it? The same people who deported them. So the question remains, what the the purpose of the cruelty theatre? The answer is to convince simpletons who think they were actually deported and to fill own pockets on their way back again.

And that's why Pakistan doesn't have solid borders, that's why Pakistan has a giant drone fleet and it's parked in a military museum, that's why military has turned relatively suppressed insurgencies into forever wars, to keep the cash and the martyrs flowing. Both of which are necessary to its own military inc's survival.

These are not wars. These are dramas. If the state was actually serious, they would have implemented National action plan which agreed to by everyone after APS. But nothing happened. Pakistan was kept in a negative peace for a while for the wars to start again.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top