Operation Marg Bar Sarmachar: Pakistan strikes Back

Status
Not open for further replies.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
i love the last sentence of ISPR release "Such a medicine after a shock"

i do know but have you noticed the silence in Iran? the media - where is IRGC?

They must be now building bunkers. Because by the strategic mistake that has been committed by IRGC. lot of others who show restrained in past with go in as well.

My God! naivety of IRGC is profound!
 
We hope that going forward Iran acts as a level-headed and responsible neighbour, the solution is to co-operate against terrorism that targets us both on our soil in a mutually respectable manner.

Unjustifiable aggression that violates the sovereignty of a nation & international law will force the other side to do the same.

Let's co-operate in a civilised manner, war is not necessary here to solve any problems.
 
koolio said:
Stupid mistake by Iran, just when we needed unity against Israeli aggression, but Pakistan had no choice but to strike back.
Click to expand...
There is no unity or Ummah, especially from Arabs and Iranians. For some reason Pakistanis make a fool of themselves cheer-leading for so called "Muslim" countries.

It is every country for itself

For this reason, Palestine and UAE both gave their highest awards to Modi. And Iran is sucking up to India with Chabahar. And Afghanistan is bending over for China and India.

And Hezbollah refuses to attack Israel.
 
Chandragupt Maurya said:
After the Balakot air strikes, the actions taken by the Pakistan army were primarily a face-saving measure. The attack on Iran can also be seen as another face-saving measure. Pakistan is likely to persist in denying casualties from the Balakot airstrikes.
Click to expand...
Everyone in the world - except for ultra-nat Hindus - holds a different opinion to you about who lost face during the Balakot skirmish.

Multiple independent research institutes highlighted your failure to target viable structures, and the humiliation with a fratricide and downed pilot said it all.

The claims of F-16s that followed could be more accurately said to be a face saving measure. But this is derailing the thread so better to leave it here.
 
Chandragupt Maurya said:
Determining who is considered a terrorist versus a freedom fighter is subjective. The Bangladesh Mukti Bahini was labeled as terrorists by the Pakistan army. The Baloch Liberation Army faces similar branding, along with PTM, TTP, and TLP. The Afghan Taliban, once portrayed as freedom fighters by Pakistan, is now labeled as terrorists by the same logic. The distinction often depends on the perspective and political context.
Click to expand...
Both countries (alongside the US/Turkey/etc) officially designate the said organisations as terrorist groups. As far as Iran-Pakistan is concerned, they were both terrorists.

India can have a different opinion but it won't hold much weight.
 
Chandragupt Maurya said:
After the Balakot air strikes, the actions taken by the Pakistan army were primarily a face-saving measure. The attack on Iran can also be seen as another face-saving measure. Pakistan is likely to persist in denying casualties from the Balakot airstrikes.
Click to expand...
Yes, Pakistan Army saved the face of Abhinandan from getting smashed further by the villagers. You aptly described it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top