Operation True Promise II - dozens of Iranian ballistic missiles hit Israel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who was saying Israel could retaliate? 🤣🤣
..
..
Politico quoting US officials: Washington is in intensive communication with Tel Aviv regarding the response to Iran which may include a military strike

US official: Among the options are striking groups supported by Iran or striking the Revolutionary Guard forces in Yemen or Syria

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Who was saying Israel could retaliate? 🤣🤣
..
..
Politico quoting US officials: Washington is in intensive communication with Tel Aviv regarding the response to Iran which may include a military strike

US official: Among the options are striking groups supported by Iran or striking the Revolutionary Guard forces in Yemen or Syria

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Could be part of the plan. Attack when Iran is off guard.

Keep in mind, Zionists are not noble people.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


comical

The UK stands fully behind Israel's right to invade Lebanon o everywhere they want.

What a ridiculous official statement.
 
Who was saying Israel could retaliate? 🤣🤣
..
..
Politico quoting US officials: Washington is in intensive communication with Tel Aviv regarding the response to Iran which may include a military strike

US official: Among the options are striking groups supported by Iran or striking the Revolutionary Guard forces in Yemen or Syria

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I have been saying since last night, multiple times, Zionists don't have any good options so they'll ideally try a face saving attack, and gloat about it later.
 
Who was saying Israel could retaliate? 🤣🤣
..
..
Politico quoting US officials: Washington is in intensive communication with Tel Aviv regarding the response to Iran which may include a military strike

US official: Among the options are striking groups supported by Iran or striking the Revolutionary Guard forces in Yemen or Syria

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

We went from "We will change the middle east" "We will destroy Hezbollah"
to "We will raze Iran completely and target everything"
To "We will target groups affiliated with Iran" and "We will not claim any attack"
 

Biden says Israel shouldn’t strike Iranian nuclear sites​

From CNN's Kevin Liptak, Alex Marquardt, MJ Lee and Kylie Atwood

US President Joe Biden is counseling Israel to take a proportional response to this week’s barrage of Iranian ballistic missiles, voicing opposition to a potential strike on Iran’s nuclear sites in the hopes of preventing the conflict that has erupted in the region from widening further.

American officials are not privately trying to persuade Israel to hold back on retaliating against Iran, two senior administration officials told CNN, a notable difference from April when Biden encouraged Israel to “take the win” following the successful interception of a barrage of Iranian drones and missiles.

Instead, Biden hopes Israel will adopt a measured approach that can both uphold its right to strike back while avoiding action that could prompt further retaliation and tip the region into full-scale war.

“No one’s saying don’t respond,” one senior administration official said. “No one’s saying, ‘Take the win.’”

How that message will be received by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains to be seen, particularly as his political standing appears more assured following successful efforts to degrade Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The stakes of the moment could not be higher. Biden has watched with mounting concern as tensions in the region have spiraled. Attempts at brokering ceasefire agreements both in Gaza and along the Israel-Lebanon border have been largely fruitless. And the pending American presidential election has elevated the stakes of trying to manage the crisis.
 
Who was saying Israel could retaliate? 🤣🤣
..
..
Politico quoting US officials: Washington is in intensive communication with Tel Aviv regarding the response to Iran which may include a military strike

US official: Among the options are striking groups supported by Iran or striking the Revolutionary Guard forces in Yemen or Syria

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Never believe anything being leaked from Israel “officials” most times it’s misinformation
 

Biden says Israel shouldn’t strike Iranian nuclear sites​

From CNN's Kevin Liptak, Alex Marquardt, MJ Lee and Kylie Atwood

US President Joe Biden is counseling Israel to take a proportional response to this week’s barrage of Iranian ballistic missiles, voicing opposition to a potential strike on Iran’s nuclear sites in the hopes of preventing the conflict that has erupted in the region from widening further.

American officials are not privately trying to persuade Israel to hold back on retaliating against Iran, two senior administration officials told CNN, a notable difference from April when Biden encouraged Israel to “take the win” following the successful interception of a barrage of Iranian drones and missiles.

Instead, Biden hopes Israel will adopt a measured approach that can both uphold its right to strike back while avoiding action that could prompt further retaliation and tip the region into full-scale war.

“No one’s saying don’t respond,” one senior administration official said. “No one’s saying, ‘Take the win.’”

How that message will be received by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains to be seen, particularly as his political standing appears more assured following successful efforts to degrade Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The stakes of the moment could not be higher. Biden has watched with mounting concern as tensions in the region have spiraled. Attempts at brokering ceasefire agreements both in Gaza and along the Israel-Lebanon border have been largely fruitless. And the pending American presidential election has elevated the stakes of trying to manage the crisis.
every time they sabotage our nuclear assets we take the opportunity to escalate

thanks to their stupidity we have thousands of IR-6 centrifuges enriching HEU to 20% and 60% at Fordow

even enriching at 20% was considered a "red line" for the West 5-10 years ago...
 

Iran vows "stronger response" if Israel retaliates for missile attack

From CNN’s Hamdi Alkhshali

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks during a press conference in Doha on Wednesday, October 2.


Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks during a press conference in Doha on Wednesday, October 2.
Karim Jaafar/AFP/Getty Images

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said that while Iran does not seek war, it will deliver a “stronger response” if Israel retaliates following Iran’s missile attack Tuesday.

Speaking in Doha alongside Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani on Wednesday, Pezeshkian accused Israel of instigating insecurity in the region and condemned what he described as historical crimes.

“We were left with no choice but to respond. If Israel wants to react, we will have a stronger response, this is what the Islamic Republic is committed to,” Pezeshkian said.

Hours after Tuesday’s unprecedented attack, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “Iran made a big mistake tonight — and it will pay for it.”

Pezeshkian’s remarks come after Iran fired about 200 ballistic missiles in Tuesday’s barrage, which it said was in response to the killings of Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah and Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh.

1 hr 36 min ago
 
There are reports circulating that Iran hacked idf air defense platforms. Also reports indicate some F-35s may have been damaged due to the fact that at any given time 20-50% of the fleet is grounded for maintenance meaning that when israel lifted off their jets, some would have remained on the ground. This coupled with intelligence where most of these F-35s are stored and which bases they use probably helped inform the target list.
 
Iran has the strategic advantage of being a huge country. They often mention that if Israel were to capture Bander Abbas, a coastal city in Iran, the F35s that would take off from there would need to be refueled twice by air tankers to fly to Tehran. F35s are invisible until they open the weapons bay to fire missiles or unless they are carrying additional fuel tanks. After that, they are very visible to the experienced radar crew. In addition, they can carry four pieces of rockets or bombs, which makes their actions very limited and requires a much higher number of sorties than the F15 or A10, for example. Even the USA would need a few months to gather a huge fleet and supplies, and to use SEAD and DEAD actions with invisible planes and cruise missiles to slowly move the sky where it has air dominance, which would enable larger and more massive strikes. At the same time, most of the attacks would have to be from aircraft carriers, because it is highly unlikely that the Gulf countries and Turkey would give their air bases for use. Turkey for ideological reasons, and the rest because they would be the target of Iran's retaliation against oil fields and developed cities whose economy would be destroyed if one rocket exploded. The story that someone is going to "crush" Iran overnight is not serious.
 
I must admit that before yesterday's attack, I thought of Iran as just an inflated balloon. It seemed like Israel was a bully that could do whatever it wanted. I was irate at Iran for not responding and waiting for Hezbollah to be destroyed after Hamas. However, after yesterday's events, my perspective has changed. What Iran has done is destroy Israel's morale and tarnish its image. The greatest loss Iran has inflicted on Israel is not military or financial, but psychological. It has shattered the perception that Israel is invulnerable and can easily eliminate all resistance forces one by one. Iran has demonstrated to Israel that it is not as dominant as it seemed and It can be attacked and any place of Israel can be hit by Iran. Iran has ripped Israel and shown it what its true position is.
 
So Iran was much more serious last night than in the last attack. Dozens of rockets falling on the largest air base in Israel did not leave anyone indifferent. And this time with fewer missiles and without any drones. What is the reason for this increased efficiency? Hacking of the Iron Dome system is mentioned. We won't find out for a long time if this is true. I think the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and the discovery of the Iron Dome battery operations played a big role. Also, by observing, the Iranians could deduce which air bases were being used for attacks and which would be the best targets. Likewise, Israel never had huge supplies, due to the sheer size of the country. They must have exhausted them further by fighting for a full year. This time the whole of Israel was attacked and the saturation of the air defense system in the north cannot be the explanation for the successful strikes in the rest of the country. It is certain that the lesson learned by Iran from the previous attack, which they immediately implemented in this one, also plays a role. Were the F35s destroyed? Some certainly are. The flight availability of this aircraft is among the worst in the world and in the fleets, about 50% of them are on service of some type. This means that although the Israelis raised their planes when they learned of the launch, a large number of planes remained grounded at the base. Available to fly, i.e. the availability of other planes (F15, F16), is much better, but there are also those that are grounded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top