Our India headache - and how to cure it

[peacemaker99]

This thread is you just repeating every Pakistani talking point and claiming it as your own. It reads like you are debating yourself.

If India is powerful and partition is incomplete then WTF is stopping you!?

we think the desire for peace will make one country want to join ajother. Why choose violence when peace will lead the way?

 

[Corax]

we think the desire for peace will make one country want to join ajother. Why choose violence when peace will lead the way?

No thanks, don't think Pakistan wants india to join it, even after you begged for ceasefire.

 

[Yasser76]

we think the desire for peace will make one country want to join ajother. Why choose violence when peace will lead the way?

OK, great, keep thinking that.

 

[PakistanLVR]

India is not willing to recognize treaty/law what's the next option of Pakistan ? bombing dams ? Nuking Kolkata to Madras ? India will reciprocate it with same way.

I know for me, I’ll gladly see Lahore and Islamabad and Karachi wiped out in return for 90% of you vermin’s turning into radioactive dust that hopefully takes out Bangalis and Nepalis too.

Actually we also believe partition is incomplete.

we think the desire for peace will make one country want to join ajother. Why choose violence when peace will lead the way?

Schizophrenic paj33t

 

[Vikramaditya1]

What the hydrology and contract law experts @lightoftruth and @Vikramaditya1 fail to acknowledge is that the IWT had its own specific dispute resolution process, a 3 step procedure.

See it's like I said before. "Proper mechanism" argument. The treaty in itself is ineffective now, what purpose does a treaty clause serve? That aside India is not having a dispute with IWT, we are not demanding new share of water sources, not new dam construction, no, it's none of these. This is an entirely new (or old) issue that makes India withdraw from the treaty and from what our government said, temporarily on hold until PK sort things out.

 

[Yasser76]

See it's like I said before. "Proper mechanism" argument. The treaty in itself is ineffective now, what purpose does a treaty clause serve? That aside India is not having a dispute with IWT, we are not demanding new share of water sources, not new dam construction, no, it's none of these. This is an entirely new (or old) issue that makes India withdraw from the treaty and from what our government said, temporarily on hold until PK sort things out.

Cool, so lets make the International Border "ineffective" right?

F**king clowns......

 

[Vikramaditya1]

Cool, so lets make the International Border "ineffective" right?

F**king clowns......

You can there is no rule that prevents it. You can claim all lands in India as much as you can, but in reality however

 

[Master Chief]

but if you nuke indian dam all water will be irradiated and unuszble, so how does that help?

Just because you are military, strategic, political , diplomatic superpower doesnt meann you should use it indiscrimately. With great power comes great responsibklity and electricity.

@Master Chief for you too

I'm honoured that you tagged me! Thank you for your attention to this matter.