PA MLRS, Self Propelled and towed artillery [BM-11, Fatah-I GMLRS, Fatah-II] - News, Updates & Discussions

They choose civilian targets first, we responded by downing their planes....they then escalated by striking some of our air bases...we then went all-in by striking their military bases, storage sites and opened heavily along LOC....

Simple question...if they were winning, why did they stop? Why to give another chance to Pak? Or is is another of their 'tactical mistakes'?
Brahmos is still a thorn in our side, next time Indians would send volleys of hypersonic missiles on the onset instead of shadowboxing by IAF for days. Pakistan must be able to cheaply target their targets with similar weapons 3 times over.
 
Crux is fire back same capability missile back to them . Let PAF handle skies only. PA should generate responses from ground and quickly dont waste time like recent of 3 days. We need a humangous inventory of SSM and CM drones.
yes, now missile threshold has been crossed. Neither side resorted to nuclear posturing due to their use. So next to me Indians would send such a volley within hours.
 
Brahmos is still a thorn in our side, next time Indians would send volleys of hypersonic missiles on the onset instead of shadowboxing by IAF for days. Pakistan must be able to cheaply target their targets with similar weapons 3 times over.
How do you deter nuclear attack? By demonstrating the capability and will for MAD.

We need to be willing to do the same. The capability is there but the will starts sagging when the brother starts intervening on behalf of them.
 
How do you deter nuclear attack? By demonstrating the capability and will for MAD.

We need to be willing to do the same. The capability is there but the will starts sagging when the brother starts intervening on behalf of them.
I have maintained since the 'accidental' Brahmos launch, that Pakistan lost quite a bit of deterrence as that missile impacted and we did nothing. Indians did that on purpose to really test our will on going nuclear at the sight of a nuclear capable missile. Now sadly they have this fall back plan like Hitler to start lobbing missiles indiscriminately. In 2019, we had prevented this by telling Indians plainly that we will consider all missiles as a nuclear attack, now we have lost that luxury.We have to match up to their non nuclear madness now.
 
Brahmos is still a thorn in our side, next time Indians would send volleys of hypersonic missiles on the onset instead of shadowboxing by IAF for days. Pakistan must be able to cheaply target their targets with similar weapons 3 times over.
Indian is still very primitive on their hypersonic missiles development.
 
Indian is still very primitive on their hypersonic missiles development.
Yes but they have active programs which are being testing already, and Russia is assisting them, so they'll possess them in a few years.
 
Yes but they have active programs which are being testing already, and Russia is assisting them, so they'll possess them in a few years.
It is almost impossible to go toe to toe with them on every field, Pakistan has to choose locating funds in certain fields and maxmaise that, in my opinion, airforce is the only choice, as PAF has both great af culture/foundation and stable supply from China , Indian on the other hand is in trouble.
 
It is almost impossible to go toe to toe with them on every field, Pakistan has to choose locating funds in certain fields and maxmaise that, in my opinion, airforce is the only choice, as PAF has both great af culture/foundation and stable supply from China , Indian on the other hand is in trouble.
Match them in tech capabilities in missile domain not in numbers. Again involving PAF is dangerous two times india have seen capabilities they will prepare more. But they yet to see our missle capabilities this is where we should be looking at in next conflict.
 
Contrary to the prevention of some of the members......India did launch vollies of bhramos.....between 10-12 missiles per target.
Our AD did an excellent job in intercepting them both through soft n hard kills. Quite a few were over ridden n made to either over shoot / miss the target altogether.
The damage at Nur khan n balori was caused by the debris of the the intercepted missiles.
All in all an excellent job by our AD
 
Contrary to the prevention of some of the members......India did launch vollies of bhramos.....between 10-12 missiles per target.
Our AD did an excellent job in intercepting them both through soft n hard kills. Quite a few were over ridden n made to either over shoot / miss the target altogether.
The damage at Nur khan n balori was caused by the debris of the the intercepted missiles.
All in all an excellent job by our AD
Nur Khan was Spoofed
Bholari it did hit offside

But then - it is no mean feat shooting down the number launched

The Ukrainians are on record saying they have no good defense against it until recently
 
Contrary to the prevention of some of the members......India did launch vollies of bhramos.....between 10-12 missiles per target.
Our AD did an excellent job in intercepting them both through soft n hard kills. Quite a few were over ridden n made to either over shoot / miss the target altogether.
The damage at Nur khan n balori was caused by the debris of the the intercepted missiles.
All in all an excellent job by our AD
hq 9 can shoot supersonic cruise missiles?
 
hq 9 can shoot supersonic cruise missiles?
PAF in particular, n PAK armed forces in general, are not in the habit of exhibiting "things" that they don't need to.
How can i put this so u can understand, n the ppl above dont get upset either......
What i have learned n have alluded to it in my post above,
AD were able to "force" bhramos into either overshooting the target or falling short.
A combo of hard n soft kill.
Hence, i have been saying it again n again u simply cant understate how successful or AD has been.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top