PAF F-16 | Discussions

That would have led to an all out war ....do you think Pakistan was ready for that ?
Hi,

You would be raising a hue and cry of 200 dead school / madrassah children ( as claimed by the enemy ) in front of the world and basing your reaction on that loss---.

Rather than going to the location with cameras and telling everyone nothing happened other than a few broken branches---and making fun of the israeli smart weapon.

Does anyone here really think that the Israeli weapon failed so miserably in not hitting the target---? I don't---.

Modi was only interested in procuring the Rafales---as he stated in his speech after the incidence---.

Well--the problem is that the Rafale induction have not solved his problem but created a bigger one---.

Paf can buy 3 1/2 JF17 BLK3's for the price of 1 Rafale or 3 J10-C's for the same price---.

The rafale technology is not over powering what the Paf will put against it---.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

You would be raising a hue and cry of 200 dead school / madrassah children ( as claimed by the enemy ) in front of the world and basing your reaction on that loss---.

Rather than going to the location with cameras and telling everyone nothing happened other than a few broken branches---and making fun of the israeli smart weapon.

Does anyone here really think that the Israeli weapon failed so miserably in not hitting the target---? I don't---.

Modi was only interested in procuring the Rafales---as he stated in his speech after the incidence---.

Well--the problem is that the Rafale induction have not solved his problem but created a bigger one---.

Paf can buy 3 1/2 JF17 BLK3's for the price of 1 Rafale or 3 J10-C's for the same price---.

The rafale technology is not over powering what the Paf will put against it---.
Unfortunately that's not how it works. Indian government officially never said they killed x number of people. Some random minister running his mouth off for public consumption doesn't amount for anything. The same satellites Pakistanis used to show no dmg would have been used by India to paint us as aggressors and terrorist sympathizers, leading them to then actually hit Pakistan military sites after our response leading to a wider war. The fact Americans and Europeans were okay with India attacking Pakistan in the first place should give you enough to understand whose narrative the world would have followed.
 
Unfortunately that's not how it works. Indian government officially never said they killed x number of people. Some random minister running his mouth off for public consumption doesn't amount for anything. The same satellites Pakistanis used to show no dmg would have been used by India to paint us as aggressors and terrorist sympathizers, leading them to then actually hit Pakistan military sites after our response leading to a wider war. The fact Americans and Europeans were okay with India attacking Pakistan in the first place should give you enough to understand whose narrative the world would have followed.
Hi,

If they can blame us for the pulwama attack--we must also manipulate the situation to our advantage.

We can either make excuses or we can act---.

In the meeting room---there were 3 people who were in favor of making the nuc explosion in the 90's---5 were against it---and 9 undecided---rest is history---.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top