PAF J-10CE News, Updates and Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hmm 2008....
No enhancement/upgrade in Typhoons in 15 years?

Also dogfights means non-BVR, right? Perhaps result in BVR scenario could be different?
The ones against Italian Typhoons in 2008 were WVR scenario but later it were the MLU Vipers that fleeced Saudi Typhoons and Eagles in both scenarios.

Screenshot_20240111_115300_Chrome.jpg
 
Why must they insist on using this ugly camouflage?

It was cute the first time, but now it's just plain cringe.

Whoever thought using this camouflage was a good idea on the J-10, instead of the default grey should immediately be fired.
 
Had the Trump military aid fiasco not happened and the PAF got more F-16s, then who knows, they may have very well ordered the Typhoon.
Still the best 4.5gen fighter in the world imo
 
Why must they insist on using this ugly camouflage?

It was cute the first time, but now it's just plain cringe.

Whoever thought using this camouflage was a good idea on the J-10, instead of the default grey should immediately be fired.
If J-10 is replacing F-16 for nuclear related roles, it makes sense to have a cameo that blends in with Indo-Gangetic plain landscape. This helps negate the WVR advantage of flankers.
 
PAF should try and push for Qatar Rafales and PLAAF SU-30s to stay at CCS on a semi-regular basis. Excellent learning potential against the IAF's two most important assets and the more PAF Squadrons we can expose to DACT against these assets, the better we will fair in wartime. IAF has no chance to train against J-10s and JF-17s and only limited opportunities against F-16s
 
A-10 may not be good looking aircraft but it delivers a punch that Mike Tyson could only dream about.
Was A-10 a boxer too? Oh Wait.....I'm sorry it's Mike Tyson that was an aircraft.:D
Joking aside, the Punch is of course irrelevant to the Paintjob , but that is kind of my point! Punch would be the same with better paint scheme also. BTW A-10 looks have nothing to do with its paint job, rather design. And design wise J-10C is quite good looking.
The comuflage is very effective for it's purpose like this Phantom .
View attachment 9961
Was the aircraft flying at the time? For how many milli seconds did it manage to hold that pose? Oh and if it was flying, was it hiding from a lightning strike?

The ones against Italian Typhoons in 2008 were WVR scenario but later it were the MLU Vipers that fleeced Saudi Typhoons and Eagles in both scenarios.

View attachment 9962
Thanks, but do we know for sure if it was both scenarios? WVR & BVR?
I'm asking because the Alan warnes tweet you shared says 'during manueuvres' which could mean WVR and doesn't say anything more.

And also pilot skill would make a lot of difference also.

The JF-17s have already seen to that.

View attachment 9963
I'm sure PAF will want J-10 to exercise against Rafale also but there will be other oppurtunities.
 
Whoever thought using this camouflage was a good idea on the J-10, instead of the default grey should immediately be fired.
I believe the Air Chief is already on his way out, unless, he too is getting an extension :ROFLMAO: .

On a another matter...
I gotta say, seeing the EFT & J-10 side-by-side - it's shocking how the two look similar in size & design.

Although, I do need to look up as to how much the J-10 can carry on its hard points, 'cause the EFT is Bomb Truck.

eurofighter-typhoon-pic.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top