PAF J-10CE News, Updates and Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
It absolutely does not.

There's a good reason why the grey color is used, and not green. Grey blends in with clouds and the sky much better than a dark green.
Is t it the paint scheme intended for level flights above the water for anti shipping?

1705079470389.jpeg
 
No you're wrong, Typhoon is also stand in medium weight category

And J35 is also medium weight jet whereas J-20 stand in heavy weight category similar to F-22/F35 medium/heavy weight (high/low) combo

If Typhoon is medium weight what do you define as heavy weight?
 
I think comparisons with Typhoon are misplaced. Typhoon was mean to be a heavy multi role fighter to replace several types in both air defence and strike roles. J-10 seems to be an air superiority fighter with secondry attack ability in medium catagory. A comparison with PAF Block 52 would be more fair I think. In air superiority it's load compares will with F-16.

J-35 is a real heavy fighter, with performance similar to Typhoon but added benefit of stealth. I would bet on that jet against anything bar a F-22
No typhoon was meant to be air superiority aircraft not a multi role

Multi role capabilities came in very late
 
F16 is multi role to begin with
J10 was air superiority but c version came with multi role capabilities
 
they look beautiful

but recently I only see things through the eyes of the Palestinian conflict

I am sure if called the PAF J10 would wipe the floor with the Israelis and the clear the skies over Gaza
 
they look beautiful

but recently I only see things through the eyes of the Palestinian conflict

I am sure if called the PAF J10 would wipe the floor with the Israelis and the clear the skies over Gaza
with f35, these j10c will struggle
 
Not sure, but even if it is, the J-10s aren't meant for anti-shipping roles.
They might not be meant for it, but could be employed in that role. Their ability to carry potentially larger Anti-Ship Cruise missiles or Ballistic missiles, might make them better suited, then any other aircraft in the PAF inventory, should push come to shove.

The first is a photoshopped picture, but something like this. The YJ-12 is one option.


1705113930674.jpeg
1705113982472.jpeg


The PAF may need this platform, down the line, perhaps with a more power engine to be able to carry a pair of Hypersonic cruise missiles with enough range to effectively keep Indian carrier battle groups at bay.

https://mwi.westpoint.edu/mwi-podcast-breaking-down-the-hypersonic-missile-threat/
 
Last edited:
They might not be meant for it, but could be employed in that role. Their ability to carry potentially larger Anti-Ship Cruise missiles or Ballistic missiles, might make them better suited, then any other aircraft in the PAF inventory, should push come to shove.

The first is a photoshopped picture, but something like this. The YJ-12 is one option.


View attachment 10842
View attachment 10844


The PAF may need this platform, down the line, perhaps with a more power engine to be able to carry a pair of Hypersonic cruise missiles with enough range to effectively keep Indian carrier battle groups at bay.

https://mwi.westpoint.edu/mwi-podcast-breaking-down-the-hypersonic-missile-threat/
Ballistic missiles on J10C? You mean Kinzal type aero- Ballistic missile?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top