PAF J-35AE - News, Updates and Discussions

[Ali_Baba]

Compared to building a HAS, it is better to expand the ADIZ.

Active defence, new protocols on moving jets around and decoys are a better strategy than HAS. Ukraine has learnt alot on how to keep its jets safe on the ground, and PAF should spend some time working that out.

 

[Be dazzled]

 

[RealNapster]

However that is not say the fighter race is redundant. Eventually countries will realise that satellites will need to be taken out as part of a conflict, and then the side with best fighters will find themselves in the driving seat. But that is 50 years away.

A satellites roughly costs same as a modern 4.5/5 generation fighter jet these days. If an airforce can have 500 fighter jets, it can also have 100 satellites. Taking 100 satellites is not a simple task.

Coming back to your original argument, I agree . Thats why i believe now countries will be focusing more on very long range fighter jets that have combat radius of 2500 km+. So that they can be parked very far away from enemy country border/assets. This is one such solution that may be explored. I believe options such as J-36 and J-50 already offers similar ranges.

 

[Pakistani Dragon]

Did you read my whole post?

Yes, I did my friend.

It says "early 2027". I interpret that as the first quarter of 2027.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

Yes, I did my friend.

It says "early 2027". I interpret that as the first quarter of

and after that what I said? READ IT AGAIN

 

[Pakistani Dragon]

and after that what I said? READ IT AGAIN

That's why there are two dates registered for you my friend.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

That's why there are two dates registered for you my friend.


View attachment 214869

and why you used your own dates like 31 March or 31 Dec? and I'm replying to someone that he was not agreeing with my estimates, so I said to him as early as 2027 or 2028 but my REAL timeframe for J-35 is 2028 to 2030

 

[Deino]

But for Pakistan this „news“ is irrelevant since it is the naval variant and even more so NOT seen at the factory but close to an operational NASA.

 

[Pakistani Dragon]

and why you used your own dates like 31 March or 31 Dec? and I'm replying to someone that he was not agreeing with my estimates, so I said to him as early as 2027 or 2028 but my REAL timeframe for J-35 is 2028 to 2030

You predicted it and I recorded it. The end.

 

[Death_Zone]

One thing to consider is if Greece is planning a war on Turkiye? Look at this statement, quick shocking..

Compare the size of Greece and Turkey and you will understand the first will never declare war to the second.

 

[Ali_Baba]

Compare the size of Greece and Turkey and you will understand the first will never declare war to the second.

Thankyou BonBon but the reality is far more complicated than the scenario you have painted.

 

[NA71]

German bhai ko kafi pareshani ho rahi thee bilaakhir post kar hi di.....

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

You predicted it and I recorded it. The end.

you're wrong then

 

[White Privilege]

Aircraft arent the immediate focus - AD and loitering systems along with BMs are to get the upper hand or "parity" at a minimum.

Even with additional Rafale's India will still struggle getting a longer stick so it too is focusing on networked ops - with much less enthusiasm for new jets.

We need to be careful.AD is a resource black hole, with a 'defensive mindset'. With such a mindset we are hard pressed to pary or block every attack. No AD on earth is sufficient enough and even a glancing hit like Bholari or Shahbaz will give Indians bragging rights for years, which is what they really want. As I have explained earlier we need 'offensive SAMS' to interdict their depth, and must be capable against fighters to really aid in our own dogfights. A squadron more of J-10CEs are also immediately needed as we saw how dangerously stretched thin Cobras were with very little in reserve.

 

[mythbuster]

Although many Pakistanis would not agree with my view, I still consider this a very serious problem in today's Pakistan.

It is well known that China is the largest supplier to the Pakistani military today and serves as one of the country's key economic and political pillars.

However, authoritative statistics indicate that the proportion of Pakistanis who understand or are learning Chinese is far lower than that in India—even though India has consistently regarded China as its greatest adversary.

In real life, I know some Indians active in China. Not only do they speak standard Chinese (Mandarin), but they also speak various Chinese dialects—such as Cantonese, Hokkien, and Hakka—and can even understand some of the Sichuanese I speak.
I once had Pakistani technical specialists living in the apartment above mine. I would run into them in the elevator. They could only understand simple, everyday Mandarin; if my pronunciation wasn't standard enough or I spoke too quickly, they wouldn't understand a thing.

Yet, on this forum, many Pakistanis take pride in speaking English while looking down on Chinese.

My point isn't about the inherent merits of the Chinese language; rather, it is that if you want to learn from a good friend and gain knowledge, you must first understand what is on their mind. If Pakistan were the world's leading nation today, I wouldn't mind learning Urdu, Pashto, or any other Pakistani language.

There was a time when Chinese people widely studied Russian because the Soviet Union was a top-tier global power—and the only one willing to help China. Today, the United States is the world's leading nation, and English has become a compulsory subject for Chinese students (though, with the ongoing decline of the U.S., many Chinese scholars have begun advocating for reducing the emphasis placed on English classes).

There is a Chinese philosophical term: "不耻下问." I wonder how many Pakistanis can understand this phrase.

I apologize for going off-topic. If the mods feel this is inappropriate, please delete this post.

Mandarin is one of the most difficult languages to learn , not worth the hassle in this day and age when you can get help from AI translator... there's no romanticism attached to it.