Pak Ship Collides With Indian Navy Unit, Delhi Summons Islamabad's Envoy

[Yasser76]

Proof must be in "soshial meedea."

Video statement by your Spokeswomen listing the bases hit straight after the event. Try to cope harder....

 

[Par 5]

PN Message to IN is very clear

AAJ SIRF TAKKAR MARI HAI

KALL KUCH AUR BHI MARR SAKTAY HAIN

 

[Yasser76]

Like I said, with this attitude you'll end up at the bottom of the ocean later with endless whining about illegal action in international waters. Talk big, show great propaganda then die...

Waiting saar, waiting...

2019 Modi "If we had Rafale things would have been different"

2026 Indian troll "We will sink you soon saar"

 

[SteppeWolff]

It has nothing for self defense had Indian destroyer opened fire

It's modified okay type for offense but useless for defense....

" had Indian destroyer opened fire "

But yall didn't. Pakistanis operating a much smaller vessel rammed into yours and punked yall.

Guess no balls huh

 

[Nimble]

" had Indian destroyer opened fire "

But yall didn't. Pakistanis operating a much smaller vessel rammed into yours and punked yall.

Guess no balls huh

It's not about balls.... see Firstly intention of pakistani warship was not clear.... it could have confused Indian captain.... he must be thinking wither it's some error with the ship or what? Because nobody will imagine someone with yarmook class ship will directly challenge a destroyer.... and while in this confusion collision happened....

 

[SteppeWolff]

Because nobody will imagine someone with yarmook class ship will directly challenge a destroyer....

Thats Pakistanis for you. Understandable that Indians cant digest the ballsy actions of Pakistanis.

 

[IceCold]

IN should throw out rules of engagement and sink them to the bottom instead of waiting for sarkari babu to give permission to engage.

If only "wishes were horses....."

 

[Nimble]

Thats Pakistanis for you. Understandable that Indians cant digest the ballsy actions of Pakistanis.

Let first complete information on this accident come out.... then we will see if it was ballsy action by Pakistanis or just an accident by mistake....

 

[El Sidd]

It's not about balls.... see Firstly intention of pakistani warship was not clear.... it could have confused Indian captain.... he must be thinking wither it's some error with the ship or what? Because nobody will imagine someone with yarmook class ship will directly challenge a destroyer.... and while in this confusion collision happened....

It's a basic requirement to be confused and disoriented.

Some rogue elements in Indian army also fired BrahMos relying on excuse of poor training methods and protocols.

 

[Nimble]

It's a basic requirement to be confused and disoriented.

Some rogue elements in Indian army also fired BrahMos relying on excuse of poor training methods and protocols.

I can only say we must wait for the correct reason before chest thumping.... thankfully we are not at war otherwise such incident would have resulted in both ships firing on each other....

 

[Par 5]

Let first complete information on this accident come out.... then we will see if it was ballsy action by Pakistanis or just an accident by mistake....

It was not an ''accident''. We deliberately rammed your intruding and spying ship. It's not for the first time nor will it be the last

 

[El Sidd]

I can only say we must wait for the correct reason before chest thumping.... thankfully we are not at war otherwise such incident would have resulted in both ships firing on each other....

By all technicalities and conventions, we are at war.

A ceasefire is not considered peacetime.

 

[IceCold]

Why count it as a victory merely because a few aircraft were hit, while ignoring whether command-and-control facilities, airbases, radars, and other military objectives were actually affected?

To me, neither side can reasonably claim an outright victory based on such selective evidence. Aircraft losses are only one part of assessing the outcome of a military operation; the broader objectives, damage inflicted, operational effects, and strategic results also matter.

Ultimately, the world did not recognize an outright victory for either side. The victory narratives promoted by both sides appear to be aimed primarily at their own domestic audiences. People on both sides can be satisfied with their respective narratives, but that is different from establishing an objectively demonstrated military victory.

Are you really going to go with this argument when, on the other hand, Indians always accuse Pakistan of celebrating a fake victory in 65 where it was Pakistan that initiated the conflict, only to end up defending Lahore?
In this case, it was India that initiated the attack, and in doing so your AF lost completely 6-0 and, some say 7-0 and you then resorted to firing Cruise missiles on our bases, which were replied to in kind to your bases. So at the end of the day, we were the defending party who not only defended but defended decisively, resulting in a truce. So what objectives did India achieve in hitting a few bases versus the losses it took that resulted in the IAF being completely grounded during the war, and then compare it to your rival (us) and one can get a clearer picture of who came out on top.