Pakistan-Af: Operation Khyber Storm

Status
Not open for further replies.
If the platforms want to crush this exploit they can. Twitter announced a couple days ago it will show the location of users to combat bot spam.

IMHO, if a user just blanket discounts users outside of their country to only hear domestic voices it can really clamp down on foreigner propaganda campaigns.

In the case of countries line India, it will put many of these bot farms of business. Indian tech firms know their reputation is such that their location status and especially their accents will automatically trigger western audiences to not think of them as credible. Indians are trying very hard to save their back office operations industry, but soon enough someone will come up with a challenge protocol to figure out if the voice on the other end is local or a foreigner.

Users don’t like to feel manipulated, there is growing pushback. There should be a dedicated arm of the cyber army exposing these false flaggers, to decrease their propaganda value.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Yes like that twitter handle “Inevitable West”
 
India really messed up their strategy again, now other countries will have taken note
What surprises me is Jayshankar who has diplomatic background yet comes up with silly stances, which often backfire. I remember when Iran-Pakistan crisis broke out he jumped to the occasion to declare support for Iran in what the Indians were calling "war." Within hours Iran approached Pakistan to pacify the situation, followed by visit by Iranian senior officials, including the late President. India was speechless thereafter.

The man was also pimping India to the US and maintained anti-China bias. When Indo-US relations soured, the Chinese simply refused to entertain Jayshankar and instead asked for Modi. What then transpired was what can only be interpreted as Modi bending knee to President Xi.

India desperately needs a foreign minister capable of balancing his/her act, instead of Temu Chankya, for which there is already too much of a competition going on within the BJP ranks.
 
@Waz sb

Inshallah they continue to. With the Hindutvas in charge we can be assured of this.

I have a slightly different view on this -I hope I am not thread banned for this. Several countries especially in the Middle East are least bothered about India's dalliance with the Talibs or the continued instability in AFG. They may actually be supporting this outcome to divert the attention of the global jihadi elements away from the Gulf and towards greater Central Asia. This essentially buys protection from these jihadi elements while creating chaos for PAK, IRAN and possibly the CARs.

Eventually it is in the interest of both IND and PAK to come to a modus vivendi on Kashmir, which allows PAK to focus on its Western border which contrary to popular belief is the main source of threat to PAK. If left alone, IND has little incentive to undermine PAK, which would have the unfortunate consequence of making it (IND) the frontline state against the Central Asian hordes.

Regards
 
View attachment 154725
I know its irrelevant here but Pravin has been always corrct in his analysis. We have bloody fews years ahead of us
Pravin Sawhney is an Indian propagandist, a very clever one.

Days before the May conflict, he tried to create an impression amongst the Pakistanis who value his words, that the conflict will not happen.

He thinks he can fool us by saying some cheap words in our favour in his regular podcasts.
 
Touche. I have already mentioned this on X. But you have given a beautiful visual representation to that idea.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Anyway, as far as Iranian are concerned, they will be actually happy that no dam is built it operated on the river, choking their supply.

ISR on the other hand is also easier in the desert than in the mountains of chagai.

There is also a flat land in the desert big enough where Pakistan could put a run way for drone base atleast or an airbase in the long term which will not only offer ISR in the sector but also depth against India if upgraded to a full fledged airbase.View attachment 154730

LOL yes, Afg claims that Durand line is false considering the Pashtun Nationality, but 4 times more Pashtuns live in Pakistan as compared to Afghanistan.

If anything, Pakistan should take over East Afghanistan as a solution to Durand line and Pashtun unity... as more of them are Pakustani nationals.

West Afghanistan already wants separation from the East. They can go make their own country. Barring annexation, this is the best possible option.
 
Brother, let us be honest with ourselves. For decades, the entity you are referring to and their predecessors with the same ideology were actively supported by the Pakistani establishment, whereas India supported the USSR/Russia/US backed Northern Alliance and their successors.

India is not supporting the Taliban out of any ideological affinity but is just trying to fish in troubled waters and trying to create fitna where it sees an opportunity. To give credit where it is due, Indian civil society pressure did force Muttaqi to allow female journalists in his second press conference.

India will drop the Taliban without a second thought and throw their lot with the NRF if they see a possibility of them getting into a position of influence in Afghanistan. The game that is being played is based on hard-nosed realpolitik and not any ideological preference. It is simply a case of the enemy's enemy being a friend.
Currently India is ideologically committed to undermining Pakistan, what do you think the last 20 years have been?

In fact India's motives are so denatured and skewed that they are having to make peace with being the taliban's cheerleaders.... This will ultimately leave them ideologically compromised

The comparison to Taliban 1.0 and even the mujhadeen is really quite tenuous now



Both had their own context relative to world affairs

This is now a rolling dispensation which is simply used to banditry, they barely have a functioning polity and what they do have they undermine with their own policies


If you just look at what thbroaderer Afghan population have been through, the Taliban right now should be ashamed that they are not bringing prosperity and some growth, they are responsible now for the welfare of Afghans.

Of course Pakistan's calculations have never been without flaw as well
 
LOL yes, Afg claims that Durand line is false considering the Pashtun Nationality, but 4 times more Pashtuns live in Pakistan as compared to Afghanistan.

If anything, Pakistan should take over East Afghanistan as a solution to Durand line and Pashtun unity... as more of them are Pakustani nationals.

West Afghanistan already wants separation from the East. They can go make their own country. Barring annexation, this is the best possible option.
This is exactly the quandary they open up to if they do not accept the line
 
@Pakistan Space Agency

PSA sb, Pravin Sawhney is a Chinese agent just like MK Bhadrakumar from the diplomatic side.

Regards
Indians and Pakistanis , both , declare everyone who have balanced views as an agent of foreign powers.... let's pat ourselves for finding something in common.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Yup. We will see Pakistan and the IEA sign some meaningless agreements and go home. All smiles.

TTP will carry out a terrorist attack, Pakistan will launch military strikes on Afghanistan in retaliation.

More agreements, more terrorism and more Pakistan strikes on Afghanistan.

This is going to be business as usual and hopefully, over a period of time we can expect terrorism to start declining considerably.
 
Last edited:
Yup. We will see Pakistan and the IEA sign some meaningless agreements and go home. All smiles.

TTP will carry out a terrorist attack, Pakistan will launch military strikes on Afghanistan in retaliation.

More agreements, more terrorism and more Pakistan strikes on Afghanistan.

This is going to be business as usual and hopefully, over a period of time we can expect terrorism to start declining considerably.
There needs to be one simple rule: Any person/people or vehicle(s) that come close to the border, except for the authorized/designated checkpoints, will be legitimate targets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top