Jango
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Would be hard to execute and maintain Opsec with ch****s like her around.
You think the enemy doesn't already know that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would be hard to execute and maintain Opsec with ch****s like her around.
Not directly tied. But if the FOBs and rear bases are under stress, then aircraft with less endurance (F-7s with external tanks have an endurance of about 40 mins) would be the more likely aircraft to rely on alternate highway runways. F-16s and JF-17s have endurance of over an hour per sortie. They can fly farther and get recovered on air fields/bases at the rear.
However, I think you are right that all aircraft in the inventory could take advantage and perhaps a fully loaded MR aircraft like F-16 would tax the roads. I think it would be silly for these motorways to have been built not taking into account the MTOW of various aircraft in our inventory. Don't think that is the case though.
the reality is, and ive been saying this now for ages that HAS are useless.
Once upon a time they may have worked, but unless you want 20 foot deep walls etc, they arent stopping anything.
Mountain and underground bases arent a great idea either, you've got one entry and exit, perhaps a few, all it takes is to pound them and the assets are once again as good as nothing.
Despersed assets, motorway operations etc are the way forward. Airbases wont last.
I think the enemy didnt know the exact locationYou think the enemy doesn't already know that?
They knowI think the enemy didnt know the exact location
sam uncle ky baghair kuch bhi karna mushkil hai.
in charge of mating like the 5 ra'ad's we have to a nukeHappy to see the promotion, but in "English", what is his new erm job? What does he do now? lol.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.