Pakistan Air Force | News & Discussions

Buddy, you were wrong when you said its a "confidential" info LOL! Everything isn't confidential. and about fighter pilots, I am really not interested in exact number. I just wanted idea on a ballpark figure. That is obtainable with the info I posted earlier. If you tally it with publicly available articles it matches too. So roughly it's about 2 to 3 pilots per aircraft.

So your source is an Indian website? And yes it's a highly classified number exactly for the reason you mentioned. We don't want our enemies to be certain about the pilot to aircraft ratio at all.
If it was such public information can you find the number of fighter pilots in IAF or USN for eg.?
 
Quote of the Day
A check ride ought to be like a skirt, short enough to be interesting but still be long enough to cover everything.
-- Unknown
 
Buddy, you were wrong when you said its a "confidential" info LOL! Everything isn't confidential. and about fighter pilots, I am really not interested in exact number. I just wanted idea on a ballpark figure. That is obtainable with the info I posted earlier. If you tally it with publicly available articles it matches too. So roughly it's about 2 to 3 pilots per aircraft.


Everyone can make estimates - some with civilian supremacy and accountability will publish figures because of rights of taxpayers.

Pakistan is neither - it is a security state with a failed democratic system bullied by an overstretched military influence which has little to no accountability. In such a scenario paranoia and apathy drive the publication of figures.

Then, these figures are not public but usually provided to unqualified benchwarmers in the civilian ministries by design who would not understand the significance of pilot figures other than rubber stamping requirements for pension fund clearances.

So, make your best guess and read onto disclosures made.

The PAF’s focus by all disclosures and accounts is ensuring higher sortie rates than its primary foe - it strives to accomplish this with high readiness states for both aircraft and pilots - the former through high maintenance standards (barring aircraft age and murphy’s law) and the latter by having more pilots available and qualified on an airframe.

Impact of commercial aviation took some of this down in the early and late 2010s but was rectified through COVID and then PTI ministers fake licenses disclosure which basically means no one wants to employ pilots trained in Pakistan anymore.
 
So your source is an Indian website? And yes it's a highly classified number exactly for the reason you mentioned. We don't want our enemies to be certain about the pilot to aircraft ratio at all.
If it was such public information can you find the number of fighter pilots in IAF or USN for eg.

No my "source" is not indian website lol. I said the tally of estimates from pilots passing out and average pilot span roughly equates to publicly available articles. There was few other articles mentioning the same range when I first searched it. Yes, USN & USAF pilots numbers are in public domain. Just search it and you will find it. It's not even remotely a confidential data. Canadian airforce, United kingdom, you can find about it if you search for it.

 
That is for single seat jets. For transports and choppers the ratio might be higher. It is a known fact the PAF maintains a higher ratio of pilots and support staff per air craft to allow for a higher sortie rate per aircraft
True 👍
 
No my "source" is not indian website lol. I said the tally of estimates from pilots passing out and average pilot span roughly equates to publicly available articles. There was few other articles mentioning the same range when I first searched it. Yes, USN & USAF pilots numbers are in public domain. Just search it and you will find it. It's not even remotely a confidential data. Canadian airforce, United kingdom, you can find about it if you search for it.

Those are not fighter pilot numbers though in your attachment.

The whole question is silly in itself and so are your attempt to link it with other countries. Their "openness" only extends so far. Can you tell me number of bomber pilots for the USAF fleet? Why stop there, how about specifically for the B-52 fleet, or F-22 pilots.

Anyways these numbers are highly classified for PAF (which even wants to censor serial numbers on 50yr old Mirages) so end of discussion here.
 
Last edited:
Those are not fighter pilot numbers though in your attachment.

The whole question is silly in itself and so are your attempt to link it with other countries. Their "openness" only extends so far. Can you tell me number of bomber pilots for the USAF fleet? Why stop there, how about specifically for the B-52 fleet, or F-22 pilots.

Anyways these numbers are highly classified for PAF (which even wants to censor serial numbers on 50yr old Mirages) so end of discussion here.

Well I don't want to know total B-52 pilots or F-22P's for that matter. Question came to my mind, because I wanted to assess the human resource capability of PAF particularly in expansion. What if PAF wants to add 50 or 100 new platforms to it, so what kind of effort & time would be required to develop the required human resource or is it readily available. You get to think on those lines when you start thinking strategically rather than tactically. You can call it 'silly' or whaever, its upto you lol.

BTW, I didn't 'attempt' to go to other countries. Its you who asked originally if 'other' countries also give this data out. I only answered, yes they do it. There's no reason to make a fuss out of nothing and for no reason. That'll be all. I already got the info what I was seeking. Cheers.
 
Well I don't want to know total B-52 pilots or F-22P's for that matter. Question came to my mind, because I wanted to assess the human resource capability of PAF particularly in expansion. What if PAF wants to add 50 or 100 new platforms to it, so what kind of effort & time would be required to develop the required human resource or is it readily available. You get to think on those lines when you start thinking strategically rather than tactically. You can call it 'silly' or whaever, its upto you lol.

BTW, I didn't 'attempt' to go to other countries. Its you who asked originally if 'other' countries also give this data out. I only answered, yes they do it. There's no reason to make a fuss out of nothing and for no reason. That'll be all. I already got the info what I was seeking. Cheers.

I think one of the things that has always been a strong point of PAF is the quality but also capacity of it's human resource strength.

Firstly our training institutions (Academy, War College, CCS etc) are not just good, but also quite big and can probably be expanded. In a situation where we need to surge we can greatly reduce the amount of foreign personnel we train at these insitutions. We also have personnel deputated to foreign countries too that can be recalled.

The numbers alone do not give an accurate picture of what PAF is capable of in war
 

Talons Entwined: Exercise Falcon Talon 2024​


  • Published June 25, 2024
  • By Senior Airman Zoie Cox
  • Ninth Air Force (Air Forces Central) Public Affairs
PAKISTAN --
U.S. Air Force Central’s 378th Air Expeditionary Wing and Pakistan Air Force Airmen recently conducted the fifth iteration of Exercise Falcon Talon, a bilateral Field Training Exercise focused on tactical-level counter-terrorism, air-to-ground weapons employment, and subject matter expert exchanges, held in Pakistan from June 1 - June 11, 2024.

Airmen from across the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility deployed to Pakistan in support of this Agile Combat Employment operation. Air Mobility Command’s C-17 Globemaster III aircraft delivered passengers and cargo followed by the arrival of U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons from the Aviano Air Base’s 510th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron, also known as the ‘Buzzards,’ currently deployed to the region.

Exercise Falcon Talon 2024 provided U.S. forces the opportunity to integrate with Pakistani forces to expand training interactions and support operational objectives for both nations.

“Exercise Falcon Talon 2024 has been a distinctive opportunity for the 510th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron Buzzards to collaborate with our Pakistani Air Force partners and enhance our skills both in the air and on the ground,” said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Leo Moore, 510th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron commander.

During Falcon Talon 2024, significant activities revolved around three key focus areas: tactical execution, logistics support, and planning integration. U.S. Airmen from various career fields worked alongside the Pakistan Air Force, engaging in real-world experience and knowledge exchange sessions covering areas such as firefighting, explosive ordnance disposal, security forces, medical, and joint terminal attack control.

Airmen from the 378th Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadron Fire Department integrated with the Pakistan Air Force Fire Department to conduct aircraft pilot egress drills, fuel, munitions and aircraft firefighting, policy creation exercises, and effective debrief sessions to include the introduction of the “hot wash” briefing style. They exchanged knowledge and held a friendly firefighter competition at the end of the exercise to test new skills the fire crews learned.

“The impact has been immeasurable but positive, some of the small details have received extreme positive attention and many of our suggestions or methods of doing things have already begun to gain traction,” said U.S. Air Force Master Sgt. Jonathan Campos, 378th Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadron Fire Department fire chief. “These exchanges not only help us showcase our expertise, but the personal relationships and bonds created and sense of community is palpable after such exercises.”

The Explosive Ordnance Disposal unit from the 378th Air Expeditionary Wing also collaborated with Pakistan Air Force during Falcon Talon 2024. They performed joint improvised explosive device training and operations and demonstrated techniques on how to safely handle complex problems under stressful circumstances.

Security Forces from the 378th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron merged with Pakistan Air Force security and worked around-the-clock to secure an active airfield, all United States Air Force and Pakistan Air Force assets, and personnel. Along with countering any real-world threats, security forces also created three educational scenarios and equipment familiarization in which U.S. Air Force subject matter experts facilitated impromptu briefings and hands-on field exercises to Pakistan Air Force security members and leadership.

“The biggest takeaway is the exchange of differences in the manner in which we believe security should be accomplished, all while merging new ideas with the thought process of their security measures already in place,” said U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Kevin Burk, 378th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron flight sergeant. “The scenarios not only benefits collaboration in the long run of where we can take our bilateral security mindset.”

Critical to every emergency situation, a two-person medical team consisting of a medical technician and a flight surgeon deployed to support the exercise. Medical not only treated members for minor concerns during the exercise, but also coordinated and executed three drills to include an on-base aircraft crash contingency response, an off-base aircraft crash contingency scenario, and a visit with a Pakistan Air Force flight surgeon and local hospital where they simulated a mass casualty event.

“We discussed the differences in training and capabilities of our flight surgeons and the importance of mid-level providers in austere or resource limited locations,” said U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Brian Sanders, 378th Expeditionary Medical Squadron independent duty medical technician. “Pakistan Air Force has good medical knowledge, and we shared what we have learned and demonstrated how to improve exercises to help better simulate a real-world event.”

The U.S. Air Forces Central’s Air Warfare Center deployed a joint terminal attack control instructor to conduct academic discussions on airspace control authority, coordinated attacks, sensor management, and enhanced target descriptions. Together, the U.S. Air Force and Pakistan Air Force executed live fly missions involving helicopters for infiltration and exfiltration, fighter aircraft for close air support, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platforms for real-time targeting data and combat search and rescue support. Joint terminal attack control operations primarily focused on close air support drills in a counter-terrorism environment. These joint exercises enhance interoperability and reinforce tactical proficiency through shared experiences and real-time operations.

“Subject matter expert exchanges are crucial for ensuring interoperability and fostering trust in our allies' abilities,” said U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Brandon Tatum, Air Warfare Center advanced training division chief joint terminal attack control instructor. “By working closely together, we can better understand each other's capabilities, enhance our coordination, and improve the overall effectiveness of our joint missions. This collaboration strengthens our mutual defense strategies and readiness.”

Falcon Talon is an annual, Pakistan Air Force hosted, event that builds on the crucial relationship between the two nations and brings together a powerful binational force to promote and advance mutual security in the region. U.S. Air Forces Central works regularly with regional partners during event scenarios and real-world operations to strengthen theater security cooperation efforts against aggressors within the region.

“The enduring partnership between our nations remains critical for the security of the region as the U.S. continues to stand with Pakistan in tackling the most pressing global and regional challenges, as we have since our mutual defense assistance agreement in 1954,” said Chief of Operations for Exercise Falcon Talon 2024, U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Nicholas Gardner. “Falcon Talon 2024, 70 years later, sustains our partnership by building peace, security, and stability. Falcon Talon sharpens our Airmen's lethality. We look forward to working shoulder-to-shoulder in maintaining aircraft, protecting our Airmen, and building our bonds to last for another 70 years.”

 
Buddy, you were wrong when you said its a "confidential" info LOL! Everything isn't confidential. and about fighter pilots, I am really not interested in exact number. I just wanted idea on a ballpark figure. That is obtainable with the info I posted earlier. If you tally it with publicly available articles it matches too. So roughly it's about 2 to 3 pilots per aircraft.

U at this point in time are arguing for the sake of argument.....when u have lost the argument some time back.

If ur on this forum thinking, right or wrong u will braw beat ur line of thought into the members here....then u have another thing comming .
Even i am here to learn n as u can see from the no. Of my posts.
Some members here have such wealth of knowledge that at time its best just to be quite n read others post.
 
U at this point in time are arguing for the sake of argument.....when u have lost the argument some time back.

If ur on this forum thinking, right or wrong u will braw beat ur line of thought into the members here....then u have another thing comming .
Even i am here to learn n as u can see from the no. Of my posts.
Some members here have such wealth of knowledge that at time its best just to be quite n read others post.

Ok boss. Let people decide who is doing arguments for the sake of arguments. Move on!
A piece of advise, don't see "no of posts" as a metric. No one knows anyone's background. I agree everyone including myself is here to learn & share. That was the sole reason to ask the question. Wrapping everything as 'confidential' isn't the way to go. I already explained the point why I had asked the question. Some of members have given very valuable input on that already. There is no reason to ignite your egos if I negated you that its not a confidential data. Otherwise, PAF wouldn't even public its pilots pass out parades which are very public events and other much bigger airforces won't public their data. I simply don't agree with you on your point. Let's respectfully agree to disagree then. Your personal response was unnecessary. Let's not do that. I will always respect credible information & arguments which make sense, I won't shy from accepting that I was wrong, so if you want to speak on merits of the topic you are welcome otherwise let's move on. Cheers!
 

as we have since our mutual defense assistance agreement in 1954,” said Chief of Operations for Exercise Falcon Talon 2024, U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Nicholas Gardner. “Falcon Talon 2024, 70 years later, sustains our partnership by building peace, security, and stability. Falcon Talon sharpens our Airmen's lethality. We look forward to working shoulder-to-shoulder in maintaining aircraft, protecting our Airmen, and building our bonds to last for another 70 years.”​


choti si baat - na mirch masala - keh ke rehe ga kehne wala.

Cue the conspiracy theories on what is a very important and mutually beneficial relationship barring who is in office or holding a baton
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top