Oscar
Moderator
- Mar 28, 2009
- 43,427
- 97,071
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
British secularism has little to do with the Mullah creation. If anything they were the cause of muslim backwardness and lack of scientific progress during the mughals because other than fighting over whose interpretation was correct only a handful were truly able to change materialism in leadership and instead made their own little hovels and went into so much shock after the British defeated their delusions they had difficulty finding footing. It took a British educated man who was labeled a secular and traitor to take Muslims out of their ditch these mullahs created and also propose the two nation theory because the Mullah was happy under the British and Hindus.Those jahil mullahs were a direct consqeuence of secular british occupation of the subcontinent. Many secularists also opposed its creation but at the end of the day the latter comprises the ruling elite.
I assume you're talking about Zia, a military dictator? 3rd in fact after 2 secular ones.
Not sure which islamic values are running amok. Is it the destruction of rule of law, treating fellow muslims like dirt, corruption, moral degeneracy like adultery & alcohol, torture, rape, etc, etc.
In 1949, Muslim league still held sway & the idea of Pakistan as an "Islamic" state was fresh. The secular elites had no choice in the matter. We've seen what they've done since then especially since Ayub's time.
Zia only formalized the Islamization- it was Bhutto who began pleasing the Mullahs and it was also under the objectives resolution being passed that recently migrated mullahs(same ones who called Pakistan Paleedistan) who had started creating a ruckus after here further amendments were made.
The islamic values you espouse have never been present under religious rule. When was the last time anyone at a mosque has been courteous even in just plain parking a car?
Clearly you are talking about common human values which are part of core Islam but have absolutely nothing to do with praying or fasting or religious practices you mentioned earlier. So what part of Islam is missing? The bearded surgeon who abandons his patient to die on the operating table to go pray asr?
Whats better? A 5 times praying individual who is happy to work under the British or the secular liberal elite lawyer who fought for independence?
Make up your mind.