El Sidd
Elite Member
He redeemed the card. Lol
At height of the cold war, American presidents were not mocked by Indians like that. Trump has cracked a new code.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He redeemed the card. Lol
hence, the more ever growing need of 'impenetrable defence'!
kill yourself but build an offence outside your border with missiles to protect!whats being said in this video?
so cold war approach of building air defences. which we see from iznotreal doesn't really work!kill yourself but build an offence outside your border with missiles to protect!
The guy is just a stooge with Inferiority complex (he thinks it as superiority complex).To what I was saying earlier, Jaishanker's balancing act of foreign relations and keeping domestic BJP audience happy is falling apart....
Dr. Jaishankar’s Doctrine of Denial: When ‘Your Problem is Yours’ Backfires on the Global Stage
-By: A Special Correspondent
![]()
(Lanka-e-News -25.May.2025, 11.00 PM) There’s a certain diplomatic grace in saying absolutely nothing of substance with an air of philosophical grandeur. Dr. S. Jaishankar, India’s eternally unflappable External Affairs Minister, has turned this art into an Olympic event. But alas, even the best tightrope walkers occasionally wobble—and Dr. Jaishankar is now dangling, awkwardly, between Washington’s fury and New Delhi’s pride.
At the heart of the debacle is his once-celebrated, now-regretted foreign policy mantra: “Your problem is yours. Our problem is ours.” Simple. Stoic. And, as it turns out, spectacularly shortsighted.
Enter: The Phalgam Incident—a brief but blistering cross-border confrontation with Pakistan that began with the usual diplomatic muscle-flexing and ended, rather abruptly, with a ceasefire. But not just any ceasefire. No. This one, according to several well-placed American officials, was brokered by none other than former US President Donald J. Trump in a late-night call marathon that reportedly included threats, flattery, and an ill-timed anecdote about golf.
Trump’s Trumpeting, Jaishankar’s Sulking
President Trump, never one to miss an opportunity to insert himself into international headlines (even post-presidency), claimed he personally “defused the Indo-Pak bomb situation.” Naturally, in Trumpian tradition, he added that both Modi and Shehbaz Sherieff, “thanked him profusely,” and that “no one ever saw such beautiful diplomacy.”
Except Dr. Jaishankar.
India’s top diplomat, in a manner that can only be described as passive-aggressive grandmastery, publicly downplayed Trump’s role, stating that the ceasefire was “a mutual understanding between India and Pakistan’s military leaderships” and “not orchestrated by any external power.”
That statement, seemingly crafted to resemble a standard diplomatic shrug, landed in Washington like a diplomatic slap. The State Department, not known for issuing press releases in response to foreign ministers trying to ghost their President, released a rare clarification: “The United States played a constructive role in facilitating dialogue.” Translation: Stop lying, we have the call logs.
Diplomatic Fallout & Business Backlash
In an ideal world, this would have been a mere blip in the perpetual soap opera of international diplomacy. But India, it seems, has found itself locked in a PR war not just with Islamabad, but inadvertently with Washington.
The American Chamber of Commerce in India, otherwise happy to sip chai and ink deals, is now privately lobbying Prime Minister Narendra Modi to “reassess” Dr. Jaishankar’s position. One particularly blunt American CEO reportedly told a Modi aide: “Your man insulted our man. Fix it—or we’ll fix our investments elsewhere.”
Business leaders in Mumbai and Delhi are quietly echoing the sentiment. With Indo-US trade talks stalling and murmurs of a delay in semiconductor collaborations, Jaishankar’s bravado is starting to cost rupees. And when the rupees bleed, the knives are unsheathed.
Modi’s Dilemma: To Sack or Not to Sack?
For Prime Minister Modi, this is now a matter of managing egos—both foreign and domestic. Jaishankar is no lightweight. A former diplomat to China and the US, he commands respect within the foreign service and among nationalist circles. But no one is indispensable—not when they're making Donald Trump look like the grown-up in the room.
Rumours swirl in South Block that Modi is “reviewing all aspects” of his foreign policy team. Translation: someone’s head may roll, and Jaishankar’s is sticking up the highest.
Insiders say that the Prime Minister was “deeply displeased” with how the ceasefire narrative unfolded, especially the fact that it allowed Pakistan and China to frame the skirmish as a joint victory over Indian aggression—and let Trump claim the moral high ground. A diplomatic triple-whammy.
The Doctrine Dilemma
It’s worth revisiting Jaishankar’s doctrine of “problem compartmentalisation.” In the drawing rooms of Delhi, it once sounded like Confucius with a PhD. But global diplomacy, especially in Asia, doesn’t allow for philosophical detachment when missiles are flying and economies are tethered.
The world, as it turns out, cares deeply about everyone else’s problems—especially when those problems involve two nuclear neighbours with a shared history of hostility and hubris.
By rejecting the idea that the US had any influence in the ceasefire, Dr. Jaishankar wasn’t just diminishing Trump—he was also telling the West: We don’t need you. Unfortunately, the West controls the boardrooms that fund the tech corridors of Bengaluru and the mega defence deals signed in Washington hotel lobbies.
A Growing Credibility Crisis
Perhaps the most ironic twist is that, in trying to preserve India’s strategic autonomy, Jaishankar may have damaged its strategic credibility. Western allies now ask: if India can’t even acknowledge assistance from its supposed strategic partner, how dependable is that partnership?
British officials, too, are said to be quietly bemused. One diplomat at the Foreign Office quipped, “If Jaishankar thinks telling the truth is too inconvenient, perhaps we should stop sharing intelligence as well. After all, our problem is ours, no?”
Jaishankar, the Philosopher Without a Plan?
There’s no denying Dr. Jaishankar’s intellect. But in today’s hyper-connected world, high-minded detachment is not diplomacy—it’s denial. The line between preserving national dignity and self-sabotaging credibility is a thin one, and it appears Dr. Jaishankar has done a triple somersault off it.
As Modi prepares for yet another round of foreign summits, he now carries an additional burden: explaining why his foreign minister insists on rewriting ceasefire history while everyone else is trying to avoid World War III.
In the end, perhaps the most damning verdict comes not from Trump or Biden, but from an Indian industrialist overheard in a Delhi golf club:
"Next time, let Jaishankar philosophise at an ashram. Let someone else do the diplomacy."
![]()
LEN - www.lankaenews.com | Dr. Jaishankar’s Doctrine of Denial: When ‘Your Problem is Yours’ Backfires on the Global Stage
(Lanka-e-News -25.May.2025, 11.00 PM) There’s a certain diplomatic grace in saying absolutely nothing of substance with an air of philosophical grandeur. Dr. S. Jaishankar, India’s eternally unflappable External Affairs Minister, has turned this art into awww.lankaenews.com
Dear you forgot to mention that you also crashed around 6 dummy jets on your own and spread their pictures and videos to give wrong sense of victory to PAF.Not accurate. The rport is that
1) IAF used Laksya-PTA and Banshee to simulate signatures of bigger aircraft (Rafale etc,)
2) PAF shot at them thinking they were the real thing and assumed they had been shot when the missiles did hit them
3) After this volley the Rafale quickly moved in, lined up and released the bombs
No publication was given a view of this tactic until the war was 'over'. The wire and hindu removed their articles after being given confidential briefings.
Indians are such foolish race.You really think PAF pilots have same IQ as you guys
Like you guys can confuse a drone with a Rafale since you guys with your IQ kept staring at planets for several months confusing them to be chinese drones
![]()
Indian Army 'Mistakes' Planets For Chinese Drones: A Humorous Glimpse Into Past Amid Beijing's 'Newest' Worry
In an incident that combines military vigilance with the enduring mystery of the night sky, the Indian Army once found itself awkwardly placed when it mistook celestial bodies for Chinese ‘spy drones.’ World’s Most Diverse Fighter Fleet? With Rafale, F-15EX, Su-30, KF-21 In Kitty, TNI-AU Gets...www.eurasiantimes.com
You even confused your own MI17 to be a Pakistani drone and shot missiles on it
But our pilots have enough IQ to differentiate between radar signatures and speed of a drone and a Rafale. Stop making fool out of yourself with such childish and moronic stories
All the IAF jets were "well used" as target practice for PAF.1) A bigger escalation. A Prthvi can carry both nuclear and conventional weapons. One can argue the enemy is unclear if it's a nuclear attack or a conventional attack and retaliate, despite India's no- first use policy
2) Shorter flight path, a missile taking off and flying to Pak can be traked from a longer distance and theorectically stopped- but Chinese systems didn't seem to perform very well this time anways
3) Rafale had better standoff weapons and EW capabilties. But Su 30 was also well used.
it means, sell your defences at a better prices. No point, building it and make it a cage for yourself. Blackmail others, to be straight!so cold war approach of building air defences. which we see from iznotreal doesn't really work!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.