Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed.Most of the fanboys think that it was a cricket match in which one side had to win and one to lose.
Can we agree that early on..., India did not accept losing any Jets either, even though in less than 48hrs wreckage of IAF was found scattered all over India.India after loosing few aircraft had to salvage something but not to the extent that it starts a war, so launched strikes all across and a successful one while Pakistan strikes didn’t make much of a mark.
Yeah sure ‘smart adversary’Completely wrong.
DG ISPR had categorically said that Paksiatn had tracked launch of ALCMs by IAF after 10th May strikes by the IAF.
There was no launch of any SSMs. Because they would have become targets for your side.
The aim was to strike where IAF wanted without exposing itself to any risk. Thats what a smart adversary does.
sorry- but this s400 cope needs to stop.Agreed.
Can we agree that early on..., India did not accept losing any Jets either, even though in less than 48hrs wreckage of IAF was found scattered all over India.
How can you come to a conclusion that "Pakistan Strikes didn't make much of a mark."
Until your CDS had brought up losing jets in Singapore, there was no official confirmation.
I believe we made a compelling case of taking out 02 of your S-400's. Now wanting to believe that narrative is entirely up to you. Who is to say what all may be revealed in the not-so-distant future.
A high level guy in rajouri was also killed who was planning terrorism in Balochistan. On the morning of 7thPurely from an evidence standpoint
1. 4 IAF jets downed
2. Indian Brigade HQ damaged
3. Few Pakistan AFBs cratered and some damages to the hangar (C130 or Saab2000 minor damage) with loss of life
3. Couple hits on Indian AFBs (but no satellite images)
This is a conclusive evidence that we have in hand.
What about the satellite images provided in the press briefing, and the absence of the radars during modi's PR stunt visit? Seems compelling to me, while there's no supporting evidence for the indian air base strikes, apart from social media posts by residents near those locations.sorry- but this s400 cope needs to stop.
no evidence provided. nothing there.
paf did have more credibility through this all, but nobody buys this s400 bs.
Both got bloody noses, both learnt lessons, indians hit what they wanted to, paf downed a few planes.
the world still spins- whats more important is how this changes the doctrines and future conflicts.
Yup. When later on some High Definition Images came out. You could see some prints on the ground. Do yall think they moved the S-400 to hide the damage of the radar?What about the satellite images provided in the press briefing, and the absence of the radars during modi's PR stunt visit? Seems compelling to me, while there's no supporting evidence for the indian air base strikes, apart from social media posts by residents near those locations.
Regardless, im glad this time is over and i hope another conflict doesnt start until a few years.I think rather than wasting our energies on convincing the Indians that they had convincingly lost the air battle, we just should continue to troll them..
100% the jets are quite a failure in my opinion.Yeah sure ‘smart adversary’do u even read the cow dung u are writing?
They lost 6 top of the line jets including their very best without taking down a single PAF fighter, trying to hit only 2 targets the IAF was designated. That can only be described as a ‘smart adversary’ by a
doing it for comedy value
mission accomplished
![]()
Replace Gandhi with Savarkar.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.