Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Look at the cope. Un-bloody-believable. Even if Modi came down and told him that the area was struck, this guy will still come up with some cope.

I owe an apology to everyone here for even thinking he is neutral.
 
Hayabusa said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Look at the cope. Un-bloody-believable. Even if Modi came down and told him that the area was struck, this guy will still come up with some cope.

I owe an apology to everyone here for even thinking he is neutral.
Click to expand...

The irony is they are willing to believe extremely low resolution image of the said area I have adampur low resolution imagery showing damage in such nature
Unfucking believeable
 
Bilal said:
So now Damien is using potato cam instead of high res images he has access to?
Click to expand...

If he even bothered to use Google maps, he wouldn't be looking like a fool now. It doesn't even make sense to use low resolution on a map that can be publicly obtained online.

Their next claim would be that we control Google through Trump now.
 
Last edited:
Hayabusa said:
If he even bothered to use Google maps, he wouldn't be looking like a fool now. It doesn't even make sense to use low resolution on a map that can be publicly obtained online.

Their next claim would be that we control Google through Trump now.
Click to expand...
We have some people here who still believe no indian aircraft was shot down. I Remember back in 2019, the video of Abhinandon getting ragdolled was circulating on social media and yet the statements from India were that all pilots and ac are accounted for. So yeah i dont expect some Indians to accept anything at all even if the whole world presents tons of proofs.
 
Hayabusa said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Look at the cope. Un-bloody-believable. Even if Modi came down and told him that the area was struck, this guy will still come up with some cope.

I owe an apology to everyone here for even thinking he is neutral.
Click to expand...

It's not cope, he's right. If you want higher res imagery then cough up the money. Not everyone has money or time to waste for bull like this. Ask irves or whatever lackey to purchase the image and post it and prove for once and for all that the imagery indeed showed the structure standing until the moment of the strikes.

Anyways, i'll just say one more thing. For all these images of damages so readily available that are being attributed to LM or whatever, why is it so difficult to find a Fatah-1 impact?

In any case do you really think a few sheds if proven to be damaged can be anywhere near as impactful as the Indian strikes against runways, hangars and command centres? I rest my case.
 
Hayabusa said:
You raise some valid points, especially regarding the importance of timely, high resolution imagery for accurate BDA. There is no denying that clearer images make for indisputable evidence, as seen with the Bholari examples.

However, access to high grade commercial satellite imagery is often a resource constraint for many, whereas Damien may have access to better feeds. We work with what is available, even if it involves analyzing lower resolution data. Hence, when the Google images of e.g Jalandhar Cantonment came out, it generates lots of interest.

It is important to understand the motivation behind my efforts at least. Many of us are attempting to conduct BDA because we cannot simply rely on unverified claims or social media posts. In the fog of information warfare, seeing actual imagery, even if imperfect, provides necessary validation. It serves as tangible proof that our defensive measures were effective and reassures us that the retaliation was sufficient to establish deterrence. That however, also doesn't mean we slack off, hence the ARFC was an important development as well.
Click to expand...

How about your military & ISPR. Surely, they could have hi res imagery if they wanted and have done actual damage as claimed.
 
Tomcats said:
It's not cope, he's right. If you want higher res imagery then cough up the money.
Click to expand...
No he is not. He claims to be a neutral observer. He showed high res pictures when discussing Pakistan. Now suddenly he is only using sentinel and google earth images.
 
Tomcats said:
It's not cope, he's right. If you want higher res imagery then cough up the money. Not everyone has money or time to waste for bull like this. Ask irves or whatever lackey to purchase the image and post it and prove for once and for all that the imagery indeed showed the structure standing until the moment of the strikes.

Anyways, i'll just say one more thing. For all these images of damages so readily available that are being attributed to LM or whatever, why is it so difficult to find a Fatah-1 impact?

In any case do you really think a few sheds if proven to be damaged can be anywhere near as impactful as the Indian strikes against runways, hangars and command centres? I rest my case.
Click to expand...
Dude shut the fk up don't ruin with your pathetic argument this but one sector
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 145 (members: 10, guests: 135)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top