You are missing the point here. The before and after image of that twitter post shows the before image (dates 2023) and after image (dated 2025). The GE database does not have any images of the same area between those dates. The imagery that Damien posted, that is in low res, shows the missing imagery data in GE between 2023 and 2025. In the gif he shows in the low-res imagery that the structure was likely already like that prior to the conflict given that there was no change.
Look if you want to settle the debate simply purchase the latest hi-res image of the area prior to the conflict from a commercial provider. Post it so you can give a slap in the face against Damien and show him being biased, an indian loser and whatever derogative term you want to call him. I'm sure this forum would love to, but I guess that depends on whether you want to put your money where your mouth is

.
Just to clarify i am referring to the image below.
The animated graphic he uploaded lacks logic and represents a feeble endeavor at refuting the point. If you scan through those grainy photos, you fail to even spot the alleged structure he mentions. Perhaps only if you narrow your gaze, squint your eyes, and view it through an Indian filter, would it then appear reasonable.
Next, you need to reason rationally. How could those twin structures stand together, with merely one structure dismantled, while the other remains. Does it make sense? Even assuming it is dismantled for reasons they know, why are there scorch like stains visible on the image? Do you suggest the crew wrecking the edifice failed to perform a decent task for two years?
Finally, this self-proclaimed satellite image analyst /geo-intelligence expert ought to possess sharp photos from any period. It does not make sense why he utilize blurry pictures when you have access to clearer pictures like the one displayed on Bholari and Nur Khan airbase? He was parading those images around like a trophy, and was even happily giving updates on the repair status of those roofs at the respective airbases. There were even times he was low-key mocking the time taken to repair those damages. But when it comes to India's bases, suddenly he had to utilise low resolution images? It lacks logic to my mind.
The only way this can be disputed, is if anybody can present a clearer picture of the original structure occurring prior to May 7th 2025 (preferably 6th to further reduce the chances of India claiming construction), only then might it be relevant. Other than that, the damage is carried out by a Pakistan missile since there are no reports of the building demolishing due to any other matters arising (e.g conflict, terrorist attack, fire)
Despite that, even if this proves to be true, there now exist numerous separate photos accessible showing the destruction in different areas, so once more, there is minimal worry and plenty of satellites imagery on Indian damages. .