Charring and discolouration may not mean much after few months.
I would give example of Nur Khan base in this context. I have attached two images of the base, with one taken in 2024 and the second one in Sep 25. In the first image the structure is intact and the second one some construction is in progress. Please note that, the fire at that place was so intense that it was picked up by NASA’s satellites that track forest fires across the globe. It was showing under fire for almost 24 hours. Look at the picture, there is not even a hint of any fire in the entire area.
Moreover, had immediate BDA pictures not come out showing the damage at Nur Khan, the Google Earth pictures would have been dismissed by “trust me bro” brigade as there is nothing that indicates any battle damage. In these images it’s just some construction under progress.
Same goes for all other places that were successfully struck by India. Wherever, the imagery has been updated, it shows some tarpaulin cover or construction under progress. There is no hint of any damage caused by a weapon.
Thats why BDA pictures have to be taken in a certain time frame beyond which it just becomes a narrative creation.
Even at Sargodha, there is a patch on the runway. Had immediate pictures not come out showing the craters, the fanboy brigade would have called it normal Reapir at a runway, which isn’t uncommon.
You and very FEW posters have displayed critical thinking in this regard hence my submission. Most of others seem to be under confirmation bias and want to look at every dark shade as a missile strike and every shadow as a repair after damage.
View attachment 169504View attachment 169505View attachment 169506
