I appreciate the sentiment. Nevertheless, my view is based on
historical knowledge. The PAF has its roots in
No. 659 Squadron AAC of the Royal Air Force and maintained a close working relationship with the British and American Air Arms through the years and learned much from them from time-to-time. The PAF is now a well-developed institution with wholesome domestic training programs and continues to strive for excellence, certainly doing a better job than India in these matters.
The IAF also has its roots in the No. 659 Squadron AAC of the Royal Air Force but shifted its military acquisition and defense portfolio
towards Soviet platforms during the Cold War and Soviet training incorporated rigid rules, strict command arrangements, and standardized tactics. The US also made sure that the PAF was equipped to handle Soviet threat in Afghanistan during the 1980s. The PAF was able to develop itself further with military acquisition from the US, Sweden, Turkey and China and expanded training programs in recent years while the IAF remained in hubris and learned a lesson in 2019. The IAF then shifted its attention to France to improve its Air Force and has certainly demonstrated the capability to conduct precision strikes in the recent clash. However, the IAF has still catching up to do in comparison to the PAF.
France develops good hardware but it is a mid-tier Western power. The USAF will wipe the floor with the French Air Force in a hypothetical showdown. Even Israeli Air Force will dominate the French Air Force in a hypothetical showdown.
The PAF is doing a good job in the region but let's not adopt Indian hubris to define our capability. Strive for excellence but be mindful of the advances of other powers.