Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought I was the only one to wonder but that Yemeni guy also brought up the same point - that there must be some bigger motive behind what Banyaland did - a nudge from somewhere to 'check it out'.
A terror attack happens in Kashmir and they straight away prepare for attacking Pakistan. Not a raid across LOC but strikes all over the country. I find it hard to buy the whole story as it is.
I am aware Modi and his Hindutva are rabid dogs and they are blinded by their hatred. But, in trying to teach Pakistan a lesson, he is also putting a lot at stake. This could spiral out of control to become a question of existence for both sides.
He is not stupid to take such a huge risk just to avenge an attack in an area which is prone to attacks anyway. Nor is he that big of a moron to underestimate Pakistan's capabilities or its will to defend itself.
Then Why?
i had this thought earlier, what if India is trying to avoid turning into another Ukraine against China? they knew Pakistan has the capability to strike back yet they still attacked Pakistan, maybe they're trying to show the Americans that we are not ready for China yet because we can't even defeat a much smaller enemy.For starters Do you think any western powers still see India as a viable option against China when this is the clownshow they put up against comparatively insignificant Pakistan?
No, that's incorrect. The Indians at least officially have a no first use policy, while the Pakistanis are more ambiguous, and only state if the existence of Pakistan is threatened they'd resort to a first strike. A limited invasion, either way, does not necessarily trigger the threshold of either side, you only have to look at Kargil, when both nations were already nuclear.In case of India and Pakistan, infantry and Armour engagement is pretty much the step that is nuclear. Why do I say this? It's because of th3 low nuclear threshold that both nations have. An invasion into mainland will likely lead to nuclear strikes, especially on Pakistan's side with low grade nuclear capable tactical missiles.
So no, the next step would be nuclear.
Pahahahahahah!!!!!
Agree.Ceasefire or no Ceasefire.
India is crumbling from within.
Modi's govt and their policies already have lost on the local level thanks to their religious fanaticism.
Modi’s BJP has historically benefited from Hindu-Muslim polarization.
Modi is now trying to cling India's enemies to open a front and develop a favourable local narrative to have some face saving for his next campaign.
We don't mind it as far as none of the Pakistanis get hurt.
Above all their media handling is hilarious.Keep your puppet shows limited to your side of the border.
Irrational acts of madness towards our side will not be excused.
Water wars have started in south asiaI thought I was the only one to wonder but that Yemeni guy also brought up the same point - that there must be some bigger motive behind what Banyaland did - a nudge from somewhere to 'check it out'.
A terror attack happens in Kashmir and they straight away prepare for attacking Pakistan. Not a raid across LOC but strikes all over the country. I find it hard to buy the whole story as it is.
I am aware Modi and his Hindutva are rabid dogs and they are blinded by their hatred. But, in trying to teach Pakistan a lesson, he is also putting a lot at stake. This could spiral out of control to become a question of existence for both sides.
He is not stupid to take such a huge risk just to avenge an attack in an area which is prone to attacks anyway. Nor is he that big of a moron to underestimate Pakistan's capabilities or its will to defend itself.
Then Why?
It is my pleasure, this is a team effort. Pakistan Zindabad.@Registered
Just a quick post from management.
We wish to thank those in this really busy time that have volunteered and graciously helped out with moderating -
Those included are
@Fatman17
@LeGenD
@PakSword
@krash
@arslank01
Really appreciate the help and emergency moderating you have helped out with.
Not to forget @RescueRanger and @Oscar who have been on here 24/7.
Thanks again
Well wreckage should be treated as UXOs: I have made a detailed post on staying safe during war-time where I talk about UXO's:Thanks dude for the clarity.
HOWEVER, I do still think anyone should be CAUTIOUS near an Israeli manufactured drone. It would be foolish to assume any war equipment built by that nation doesn't necessarily have some sort of booby trap in it. Surely this is the most logical approach to take if wreckage is found?


We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.