Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

listen, smart dumb shit...
first learn to argue without bias, I am open to argument, without any profanity, you seem to have divine right to blow any one with 'bullshit'!
and dont feel any pride about your english, you are still brown second rate 'immigrant' who has made locals stranger. Dont think you hold some brown right to abuse anyone (shows how shameless you really are!)

last time (though reluctantly) what is your argument ( I will not answer, if there is any profanity)?
dont even talk about covariance, you were confusing causation with independence, hence argument of covariance was presented.
You're offended by my so called 'profanity' but you seem to think you have the only right to profanity!! :)

I'll put it simply for even someone like you can understand. You made the bullshit conspiracy claim that there's a ceasefire agreement that prevents Pak or China from releasing satellite images...that's complete bullshit, I called you out on it and it started frothing at the mouth.

I wasn't confusing anything...I said don't make the logical falacy of confusion CORRELATION with CAUSATION! you clearly don't know what either of those terms mean, and started prattling on about covariance, which you also have no idea what it means. Go get yourself a proper education and come back when you've learnt something.
 
Yes, China is indeed a centralized country. All the power in China is concentrated at the top.

But, it is very difficult to reach the pinnacle of power in China. In comparison, it is much easier to become the president of the United States (as long as you have enough money, you can easily ascend to the throne of the president of the United States).

The highest authority in China is nominally the National People's Congress (NPC), but the actual highest authority is the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (PSC). That is, a group of 7 people. The top leader is only the public face of the group.

To join this group, you must have strong enough abilities and rich enough political experience...... these two alone are difficult enough.

At the same time, there is an invisible rule in traditional Chinese political philosophy: the top leader must be decisive and ruthless. This is the most difficult point.

The greater the power, the greater the responsibility and the higher the demands.

Agree - Chinas systems looks and feels like an aggressive evolutionary process. China has not produced many bad leaders. Pakistan has produced loads of bad leaders. The difference is that China's political system is more open and more evolutionary. Pakistan is still stuck in the old family network. That is what you need in any political system is "evolution".
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You're offended by my so called 'profanity' but you seem to think you have the only right to profanity!! :)

I'll put it simply for even someone like you can understand. You made the bullshit conspiracy claim that there's a ceasefire agreement that prevents Pak or China from releasing satellite images...that's complete bullshit, I called you out on it and it started frothing at the mouth.

I wasn't confusing anything...I said don't make the logical falacy of confusion CORRELATION with CAUSATION! you clearly don't know what either of those terms mean, and started prattling on about covariance, which you also have no idea what it means. Go get yourself a proper education and come back when you've learnt something.

man! your mental check up is due!
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

india is the sole prepetrator of terrorism since 1947 when, the first time, Indian forces were deployed in Kasshmir (a neutral region!)
 
Agree - but Chinas systems looks and feels like an aggressive evolutionary process. China has not produced many bad leaders. Pakistan has(loads). The difference is that China's political system is more open and more evolutionary. Pakistan is still stuck in the old family network. That is what you need in any political system is "evolution"

There is no 'evolution' without education. And there is no 'education' without stability. And there is no stability, without political stability.
IMO, Pakistan should have firmly stuck with a hybrid system when General Zia ul Haq died in August 1988. But Pakistan tried systems which were neither here nor there, with fake 'progressive' Democrats like the Bhuttos, the Amir ul Muminoon Fascist like Nawaz Sharif, and lately the hypocritical, stupid Riyasat e Medina Imran Khan. Decades lost trying to put cart before the horse. But in last 2-3 years, Pakistan's benefactors have told Pakistan to shape up because the begging bowl is being broken and thus we see what we see now.
 
I am sure Pakistan prefers the atheist "Uighur massacring" Chinese which supply J10-C fighter jets much more than lip service from the Ummah. Additionally India's silence on China laying claim to entire Arunachal Pradesh and renaming it Zhangan is quite intriguing. Then there is the Brahmaputra Waters Treaty ( or lack of it 🤣🤣) with no protests from India as China builds the largest hydroelectric system in the world on the Tsang Po river.
What are India's options on China? Ban the Chinese "Jhalar" decoration lights used in Diwali?
I doubt anyone here cares about the Uighur thing. Renamings mean nothing, everyone is playing that game.. gulf of America, Arabian gulf.. who cares ?

Dunno about the Chinese dam, will it dry us up ?

The rumors about China massacring Uyghurs are created by the Western media and Zionist organizations.

PDF There is a senior Pakistani member, Aziqbal, who used to hate the Chinese government because of the rumors about the Uyghurs in China. However, he has recently made a 180-degree change in his attitude towards China and has become a hardcore supporter of the Chinese government. Why? Because he went to Xinjiang himself.

I suggest that we all go to Xinjiang, China, to see for ourselves. China is now offering 240-hour visa-free treatment to the whole world, and anyone can visit any places, including Xinjiang and Tibet, at will. And China has some of the cheapest industrial goods in the world, and all your purchases in China are eligible for outbound tax refunds.
 
I thought it's spelt madrasa? What do the madrasa folk prefer, madrasa or madressah?

Why didn't you ask your substandard English teacher? Well there are many Madressahs in Britain, go ask what they prefer. Some of them may be in some no go areas. Make sure you don't have Mirza material with you when you end up there.
 
we shall soon find out unlike PTI, JUI F has mushawarat.
I have seen Lord of JUI-F do one thing. Very well. Jump Ship at the correct time. Then Join the new Berth and sail with a new Admiral, Captain and Skipper. Rinse and Repeat. Or Bail and repeat.

Its just that Khan, didn't allow it on his sail. Diesel got used by the Admiralty to topple Khan but Diesel is used for combustion and that's it. But Diesel is needed but shall never surpass the rank of skipper. But dreams of being a Captain. So The Admiral shows it the dream of being its Captain sailing in a new berth, but that will never happen.
 
Agree - Chinas systems looks and feels like an aggressive evolutionary process. China has not produced many bad leaders. Pakistan has produced loads of bad leaders. The difference is that China's political system is more open and more evolutionary. Pakistan is still stuck in the old family network. That is what you need in any political system is "evolution".
I never think that authoritarianism is better or democracy is worse. In fact, I think both systems have their own advantages and disadvantages.
I think that countries need different political systems at different stages of development.
China now needs to catch up quickly with our backward pace. This requires a high degree of unity among all Chinese people. At this time, we don't need democracy.
In the future, when we stand at the top of the world again, I think we may need a democratic system to check power at that time.

This is like corporate management. A small company cannot have too many systems to check and balance things, and it needs a more flexible approach. But when a company grows to a large size, it must rely on systems to handle things and prevent power from being abused.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top