Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Modi in Trouble | China Pak Gambit | Afghan Taliban Message | Imran Khan Cases | Sethi Se Sawal​


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TAC
More and more tweets .....same contents...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Yes, the likely first step of the next war. Hard for Pakistan to not take the damage but only way to deter that would be Pakistan's own massive deployments of missiles targeting Indian cities and military infra, if Pakistan can get those missiles in time.
 

Executive Summary

Following a terrorist attack on April 22, India launched punitive strikes on Pakistan on May 7. This began a four-day conflict between India and Pakistan from May 7-10, which became the most serious military crisis in decades between the two rival nuclear states. Both sides have declared victory amid considerable misinformation and disinformation about what occurred. This essay seeks to offer a factually grounded narrative of the evolution of the crisis, while mindful of severe data limitation problems in the public domain that complicate analysis. Even with the limited or contested information currently available, some tentative conclusions are possible.

The conflict represents several military firsts:

— This was the first time India used cruise missiles on Pakistan, both the BrahMos cruise missile (co-developed with Russia) as well as the European SCALP-EG.

— This was the first time Pakistan used conventionally armed short-range ballistic missiles on India, in the form of the Fatah-I and Fatah-II missiles and possibly other missile types.

— While drones have been used sporadically along the Line of Control in Kashmir and elsewhere for smuggling, this is the first instance of drone warfare in the India-Pakistan rivalry where both sides employed drones with the intent of causing damage on the other.

Available information also permits several conclusions about the military situation during the crisis:

— India demonstrated an ability to deliver precise standoff attacks across large swathes of Pakistan on each day of the conflict but especially May 7 and May 10. While Pakistani air defenses likely interfered with or intercepted some attempted strikes, Pakistan has a meaningful and serious vulnerability to Indian air attack.

— There is no evidence of any manned aircraft crossing into the airspace of the other side, which indicates the seriousness with which both sides viewed the air defense threat of the other even on the final day of the conflict.

— On the first day of hostilities, May 7, India likely lost several aircraft to Pakistani counterair operations. While Indian officials neither acknowledged nor denied the losses, they represent perhaps the most meaningful military costs India experienced during the Four-Day Conflict.

— On May 8 through May 10, India’s integrated air and missile defense system appears to have largely defeated several waves of Pakistani drone attacks of ambiguous scope, scale, and intensity. On May 9-10, the Indian air and missile defense system appears to have worked against limited Pakistani short-range ballistic missile attacks as well.

— After its apparent downing of Indian aircraft on May 7, Pakistan inflicted virtually no observable damage on Indian military units or facilities, though Indian officials have said there was some damage at four installations.

— While attention focused primarily on the air and drone campaigns, most of the May 7 strikes occurred in or near Kashmir; subsequent fighting along the Line of Control in Kashmir was deadly and served as a major source of casualties for both sides.

Political conclusions are also possible:

— The India-Pakistan relationship remains crisis-prone, and those crises are likely to continue to escalate in severity over time.

— While the mutual possession of nuclear weapons heavily conditioned the responses of both sides, overt nuclear signaling was lower than in many prior India-Pakistan crises.

— Both sides worked to calibrate escalation and showed some ability to manage escalation adequately. Both sides were sometimes surprised, however, by choices made by the other and, in some instances, likely viewed an adversary’s response as escalatory rather than proportional.

— The crisis was costly in terms of human lives and expended or destroyed military equipment. Those costs will likely work to induce some caution in the bilateral relationship in the near-term, a probable principal aim of Indian policy.

— The United States played a major role in crisis management, especially in the final hours of the crisis. While it is conceivable another actor could have played this role as crisis communicator of choice for both combatants, and some alternative third parties did play a role in crisis diplomacy, none of those alternative actors appear to have participated with the same efficacy as the United States.

This crisis involved the use of several weapons systems, often in innovative ways, which neither India nor Pakistan possessed at the time of their last crisis in 2019. While this crisis provides a baseline for the next India-Pakistan crisis, the pace of military technological change means that the contours of that next crisis might be meaningfully different. Both sides’ perceived setbacks and failures will serve as a major driver for defense acquisitions and doctrinal innovation.
 
Yes, the likely first step of the next war. Hard for Pakistan to not take the damage but only way to deter that would be Pakistan's own massive deployments of missiles targeting Indian cities and military infra, if Pakistan can get those missiles in time.

It all comes down to preparation and situational awareness. There is no doubt that Pakistan needs to prepare for the worst scenario.
 
Look India's objectives in 2016, 2019 and 2025 have been the same and they knew the risks as well yet it did not deter them to go ahead with their plans.

I don't agree that any airforce, small or large would allow the adversary to shoot down their planes (or at least try to shoot down) and do nothing about it because they don't want the things to escalate. It doesn't make sense to me at all.

Like i said earlier, IAF was ready to engage PAF back in 2019, to my understanding IAF was ready to engage paf even at the night of 7th May. What doesn't make sense to me that why Indian side did not utilize their number advantage against PAF?

@Dalit @Areesh Can there be any other possibility other than the one you mentioned in your posts? There is no second opinion that PAF did create a lot of chaos in IAF during that skirmish, but IAF still had the number advantage.

@Oscar @Michael any thoughts here?

I think it was the panic mode that had gripped IAF. When you lose several aircraft including Rafale the one aircraft on which you pinned all your hopes then that is where the panic kicks in and your only objective is to avoid further losses. Same happened with IAF.
 
Here it is- first official reaction of France

There is fog of war- there is a war of misinformation
We don't know what happened. We have no information
We are studying the situatiom

It's as simple as that. But sure some poster (like @TopGun786 ) will now pull teeth to make it look like he said 20 Rafale went down.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Saw it yesterday. I have to say he does sound nervous, others say the same.
 
Look India's objectives in 2016, 2019 and 2025 have been the same and they knew the risks as well yet it did not deter them to go ahead with their plans.

I don't agree that any airforce, small or large would allow the adversary to shoot down their planes (or at least try to shoot down) and do nothing about it because they don't want the things to escalate. It doesn't make sense to me at all.

Like i said earlier, IAF was ready to engage PAF back in 2019, to my understanding IAF was ready to engage paf even at the night of 7th May. What doesn't make sense to me that why Indian side did not utilize their number advantage against PAF?

@Dalit @Areesh Can there be any other possibility other than the one you mentioned in your posts? There is no second opinion that PAF did create a lot of chaos in IAF during that skirmish, but IAF still had the number advantage.

@Oscar @Michael any thoughts here?
You've to understand their mindset in the light of the KITAP....

Few inklings:
  • If one jet gets shot down all the pilots would assume they're shot too
  • The "black energy" that keeps them motivated and bold starts failing as they start going more toward the space
  • Their core understandings and beliefs don't change with time or space
  • Once a setback happens it's hard for them to maintain the spirit. They need a long time to regroup
  • The more Sher they acquire the less Khair they enjoy. Both Sher and Khair are under HIS Irade. In Khair (for the Ehl-i Iman) is HIS Riza, and in Sher (for the Ehl-i Kufr) is HIS La'net
  • Etc.
 
Last edited:
The Hindutva are angry, demoralised and hurt. They cannot hide their disappointment. The Hindutva media is very angry at Modi for not continuing the skirmishes against Pakistan. Let's face it, the skirmishes were very shortlived. Hindutva wanted Modi to go all the way. Conquer Pakistan and settle it for once and all.

The problem with Hindutva is that they are living in a different universe. In their imagination, Pakistan is a very easy target that can be easily conquered. These skirmishes have demoralised the average Hindutva.

True that's why they run around every social media platform on earth saying how they hit PAF hangers.
I'd hang my head in shame if our jets went down quicker than a lead weight in water.
 
Saw it yesterday. I have to say he does sound nervous, others say the same.
Bro I'd like to request if you can please kindly unlock the thread below, I think it's actually a very important discussion that deserves its own thread. It's for specifically discussing counter-measures from what we learn from this current thread about the conflict.

 
Bro I'd like to request if you can please kindly unlock the thread below, I think it's actually a very important discussion that deserves its own thread. It's for specifically discussing counter-measures from what we learn from this current thread about the conflict.


Bro we already have a post conflict assessment thread going on. We can all post there. I can merge it?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Bro we already have a post conflict assessment thread going on. We can all post there. I can merge it?
Post-conflict is good to discuss the conflict as a whole and is quite cluttered, I think that separate thread would be better to discuss specifically about our air defence (given the BrahMos strikes) and also discuss ways to penetrate India's for counter strikes. IMO they serve different purposes and the latter discussion is very important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Waz

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top