FarhanSiddiqui
Registered Member
I wanted to give you negative star posting this criminal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wanted to give you negative star posting this criminal
Jezzzz…
Even Sami knows PAF is # 1 … IAF … lol an orphan
So far I've seen a lot of misinfo and jingoistic comments from both sides.
But looking at the facts objectively it's clear that india lost 2-3 Jets with one likely being a Rafale. But India had the edge in drones and cruise missiles in this war.
I was in Jodhpur (it's close to the border) in uni when the skirmish was hot, we had 2-3 days of blackout post 12pm, we saw nothing though. I do remember reading about attacks on Jaisalmer though.
This was a short skirmish than a war, the strategic aim of India being detterance against Pakistani sponsored terrorist attacks in India.
Two major problems for Pakistan are:
1. Has nuclear detterance failed? What is the threshold of nuclear approach? Cruise missiles have hit Pakistan proper now. It's not just surgical strikes in the past.
In a full fledged war India due to its geography and size would have the strategic advantage and calling the nuclear bluff could be the decisive aspect.
Imagine something on the level of Operation Brasstacks by India.
2. What about IWT? Another major thing in this conflict was the abeyance of IWT by India.
3. Pakistan has been reactionary in this skirmish, so it's effectively India controlling the escalation ladder, what do you think about that?
4. India due to its large size/economy would have a easier time replenishing and rearming. Rafales 4.5 gen fighters just like any other fighter, they're not the decisive card as they are hyped to me. It's just jingoism.
These are just some of my observations, i might be biased yeah but that's a given on both sides.
we already started on that ordered HQ 19B missiles. Indian AD is also nothing to write home about either. An S400 cheeseboard radar was destroyedYou have correct assemssment and I am sure both sides are going to sit down and learn lessons......If India can decide to escalate but at what cost??? Entire airforce grounded??? how can one fight a war without the airforce?
On the other hand Pakistan needs some serious investment to stop hypersonic missiles and cruise missiles.....
lots of lessons to learn
At this point if India stops our water , China is already saying the will take action and stop Indian water....IS THIS ALL WORTH IT FOR MODI TO WIN ELECTIONS????
Indians need to sit down and think who is the enemy here.....
Aren't they BVRs??faaz missiles
??So far I've seen a lot of misinfo and jingoistic comments from both sides.
But looking at the facts objectively it's clear that india lost 2-3 Jets with one likely being a Rafale. But India had the edge in drones and cruise missiles in this war.
I was in Jodhpur (it's close to the border) in uni when the skirmish was hot, we had 2-3 days of blackout post 12pm, we saw nothing though. I do remember reading about attacks on Jaisalmer though.
This was a short skirmish than a war, the strategic aim of India being detterance against Pakistani sponsored terrorist attacks in India.
Major problems for Pakistan are:
1. Has nuclear detterance failed? What is the threshold of nuclear approach? Cruise missiles have hit Pakistan proper now. It's not just surgical strikes in the past.
In a full fledged war India due to its geography and size would have the strategic advantage and calling the nuclear bluff could be the decisive aspect.
Imagine something on the level of Operation Brasstacks by India.
2. What about IWT? Another major thing in this conflict was the abeyance of IWT by India.
3. Pakistan has been reactionary in this skirmish, so it's effectively India controlling the escalation ladder, what do you think about that?
4. India due to its large size/economy would have a easier time replenishing and rearming. Rafales are 4.5 gen fighters just like any other fighter, they're not the decisive card as they are hyped to me. It's just jingoism.
These are just some of my observations, i might be biased yeah but that's a given on both sides.
3 Rafale killed 4 damaged. Serial numbers of damaged aircraft are as follows.
Sure. Go ahead.I wanted to give you negative star posting this criminal
Beyond the first 2 days and strikes Airforce went out of the picture on both sides. The skirmish moved to drones and cruise missiles.You have correct assemssment and I am sure both sides are going to sit down and learn lessons......If India can decide to escalate but at what cost??? Entire airforce grounded??? how can one fight a war without the airforce?
On the other hand Pakistan needs some serious investment to stop hypersonic missiles and cruise missiles.....
lots of lessons to learn
At this point if India stops our water , China is already saying the will take action and stop Indian water....IS THIS ALL WORTH IT FOR MODI TO WIN ELECTIONS????
Indians need to sit down and think who is the enemy here.....
But I say truth saaar please accept.Desh darohi sarr… delete this post sare
Confirmed not speculated. Many of those posts and pictures were fake.??
You have debire for four sites and reports of loss at least 5 sites
You can look up the dedicated thread
The debrie confirms mig29, su30, mirage and rafale with pilots death at atleast two locations
So where are you getting 2-3 ??
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.