Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[NationalistPKDude132]

You must be privy to plans made by your highest military planners. They shared that with India too? That is something very powerful.

Alas, our military is quite bad in this regard. They don’t share anything with such a dedicated lot of Indians.

yes and your bjp just shared what you are gonna do in the next time.

Thanks Defence Minister of India for telling us you will open with the naval front next time LOLZ

 

[Vox Non Dei]

Its saying it is fake. A fact check always has some refutation provided with it to disprove the claim. PIB is just saying it is fake.

You do not know the context.. read few posts back in that discussion. My point is that government of India has already denied any female pilot being MIA. And so did Pakistan's military. Its only weirdos on this forum who are holding on to that weird hope of an Indian female pilot captured since 11th May. LOL!

 

[Khanivore]

Ok so BS 001 wasnt destroyed so that image really might have been ai doctored

View attachment 125284

My response to him...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[TopGun786]

Are you laughing or just crying behind half open door.?

This is the Indian troll while making such nonsense comments

 

[Tremain]

against Paksiatn

Use the correct spelling.

 

[Vkdindian1]

yes and your bjp just shared what you are gonna do in the next time.

Thanks Defence Minister of India for telling us you will open with the naval front next time LOLZ

Don’t know about naval attack but next time it would be bigger than last two times.
In 2019 it was just one target.
In 2025 it increased to 12 with serious military hardware into play.
In the next such instance, it is likely to be an attack directly over military facilities.

With suspension of IWT, this time the start could be by your side.

 

[Master Chief]

I never claimed it. Please ask this from those who
made this claim.
There were adequate deterrences on both the sides to stop any misadventure of this nature.
Moreover, no side wanted a full war. Involvement of any additional elements would have escalated in many unknown ways.



There was no plate and nothing to be eaten. Your military leaders have tried to create imaginary plates and elaborate menus in the past. It never reached their mouth when they tried. 1965 was biggest example.

The facts suggest otherwise.

70+ IAF aircraft were in formation on the first night, to discharge payloads and take on the PAF.

This is a mobilisation designed to cripple an opponent's air force, nothing less. Indian civilians were baying for an invasion. Why shouldn’t the Indian armed forces, who only ever serve the nation as we are told ad nauseam, attempt to deliver on this?

We know that plan went wrong. There should be no shame in accepting that. Indeed, continuing the delusion only harms the development of IAF. Likewise, denying fallen pilots their basic right to national recognition will only harm morale for those pilots who remain and the bereaved families of lost servicemen.

There is also no way that India's best proposed outcome of a "strategic stalemate" (for the record, I am claiming a marginal Pakistani victory overall and am sure most independent analysts would go AT LEAST that far also) could possibly satisfy your pre-conflict expectations. Even a stalemate is regarded as a victory for Pakistan because our objective was to defend our sovereignty and territory.

Pakistan probably did not want a full war at the outset of hostilities, but India definitely did.

 

[Abdul q]

The facts suggest otherwise.

70+ IAF aircraft were in formation on the first night, to discharge payloads and take on the PAF.

This is a mobilisation designed to cripple an opponent's air force, nothing less. Indian civilians were baying for an invasion. Why shouldn’t the Indian armed forces, who only ever serve the nation as we are told ad nauseam, attempt to deliver on this?

We know that plan went wrong. There should be no shame in accepting that. Indeed, continuing the delusion only harms the development of IAF. Likewise, denying fallen pilots their basic right to national recognition will only harm morale for those pilots who remain and the bereaved families of lost servicemen.

There is also no way that India's best proposed outcome of a "strategic stalemate" (for the record, I am claiming a marginal Pakistani victory overall and am sure most independent analysts would go AT LEAST that far also) could possibly satisfy your pre-conflict expectations. Even a stalemate is regarded as a victory for Pakistan because our objective was to defend our sovereignty and territory.

Pakistan probably did not want a full war at the outset of hostilities, but India definitely did.

Ceasefire on trade threats is humiliating itself….

 

[Fatman17]

@Baibers_1260

Interesting, thanks. But that still doesn't explain what happened to the NLI boys who were part of the Lumber One Army.

Regards

Off topic. Please desist

 

[Baibers_1260]

Unlike you, I am WAY more through in my posts...
This is a Government of India related twitter handle.
View attachment 125345

Do AvM Bharati and CDS Lt.Gen. Anil Chauhan have access to this Twitter handle?

 

[TopGun786]

typical parroting, rote learning and regurgitator mindset

I said multiple times before that this troll tries to hide between typing too many words.
He thinks typing too many words will strengthen his point but what can be done by an essay with no meaning at all?

 

[Vox Non Dei]

Do AvM Bharati and CDS Lt.Gen. Anil Chauhan have access to this Twitter handle?

How would I know?

 

[Baibers_1260]

Ceasefire on trade threats is humiliating itself….

Contrast this with the Israeli strike on Iran.
100 + Israeli aircraft flew 2000 km and released missiles both inside and outside Iranian airspace hitting 20 targets with precision. They ALL returned safely to base. with no losses.
Why couldn't the Indian Air Force do that over a much shorter distance and a much weaker enemy?
@Vkdindian1 @Vox Non Dei

 

[Oracle]

10- May missile Air defense

People don't understand that Anti missile success doesn't mean only destroying incoming missile every time during interception. It can also deviate missile so missile don't fall where it supposed to be. That also a successful AD.

Missile has to fall somewhere on ground. A camera far away cannot predict if it's fail or successful intercept.

It's for both India and Pakistan. Missile fell inside bases far away from targets means a Good AD work as well

 

[Vox Non Dei]

Contrast this with the Israeli strike on Iran.
100 + Israeli aircraft flew 2000 km and released missiles both inside and outside Iranian airspace hitting 20 targets with precision. They ALL returned safely to base. with no losses.
Why couldn't the Indian Air Force do that over a much shorter distance and a much weaker enemy?
@Vkdindian1 @Vox Non Dei

Simply because Iran is a much weaker opponent who does not have any modern airforce and their air defences are ineffective. Not to mention, Israel's airforce has better fighters including fifth generation ones.

The best fighter in Iran's air force is F-14. That too poorly maintained.