Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[ARMalik]

Stop lying please. You said exactly same thing few days back.

No such reports have been published by anyone.

Indians asking others to NOT lie. How Ironic !!

 

[Vkdindian1]

Once again, insignificant damage confirmed on Pakistan side so irrelevant and BS point u keep pushing because as pathetic as it might be, it’s all u have to help u cope and live with the humiliation of PAF v IAF = 6-0 including the uber expensive Ra-fail that was meant to take on the J-20

It’s not about significant damage or amount of damage but ability to strike deep and hit even the most secure targets. Example Sargodha and Nur Khan.
The damage on the ground isn’t important for these places but the fact that Nur Khan is 10 Kms from GHQ and your National capital. We all know the importance of Sargodha too, in terms of geographical depth and assets it has. Same goes for some other bases.

Basically, it was about success of strategies adopted by both the sides in all aspects of this conflict.

PAF successfully shot down IAF aircraft. Definitely a significant damage and a big success in Air to Air battle.
Then both sides carried out attacks to cause damage to ground targets and display their capability to strike where they wanted.

That is where Pakistan failed miserably.

Many of you have been saying India used so and so weapons, we could have used so many which we decided against etc etc. You use your weapons to cause damage the way you want and not to cry later. Pakistan made a choice and failed to hit anything significant.

Then there is claim that Indian spokesperson accepted about the attacks. Yes, she accepted about the attacks but also said no significant damage.

Moreover, had any major damage taken place, ISPR would have come out with Satellite pictures taken by Mizar and many other Chinese companies.

I find most of your posts childish and immature. I thought I would still answer to your rants hoping that you would be able to use your brain once and analyse.
Please try.

 

[Vkdindian1]

Indians asking others to NOT lie. How Ironic !!

Means you are lying but I can’t ask you not to?

Can you point out my lie?

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

i am afraid we have wasted alot of time on non hypersonic ballistic missiles. israel can attack us anytime in next couple of years. we need hypersonic glide missiles and that too in large number. as can be seen non hypersonic are easily intercepted by israel air defence?

 

[ARMalik]

Unfortunately or fortunately, Pakistan has no other option but to interfere in Eastern Iran and create a big buffer zone. In the process take care of those terrorists sitting in Eastern Iran. In fact I say Pakistan needs to create a NO-FLY zone in Eastern Iran.

 

[NA71]

Meanwhile....

A Royal Navy F-35B jet from the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier, operating in the Arabian region, made an emergency landing today at Thiruvananthapuram airport in India.

 

[TAC]

It’s not about significant damage or amount of damage but ability to strike deep and hit even the most secure targets. Example Sargodha and Nur Khan.
The damage on the ground isn’t important for these places but the fact that Nur Khan is 10 Kms from GHQ and your National capital. We all know the importance of Sargodha too, in terms of geographical depth and assets it has. Same goes for some other bases.

Basically, it was about success of strategies adopted by both the sides in all aspects of this conflict.

PAF successfully shot down IAF aircraft. Definitely a significant damage and a big success in Air to Air battle.
Then both sides carried out attacks to cause damage to ground targets and display their capability to strike where they wanted.

That is where Pakistan failed miserably.

Many of you have been saying India used so and so weapons, we could have used so many which we decided against etc etc. You use your weapons to cause damage the way you want and not to cry later. Pakistan made a choice and failed to hit anything significant.

Then there is claim that Indian spokesperson accepted about the attacks. Yes, she accepted about the attacks but also said no significant damage.

Moreover, had any major damage taken place, ISPR would have come out with Satellite pictures taken by Mizar and many other Chinese companies.

I find most of your posts childish and immature. I thought I would still answer to your rants hoping that you would be able to use your brain once and analyse.
Please try.

1. India and IAF in particulars humiliation and humbling in the air was epic and is indisputable.

2. India resorted to ground attcks after that failure and u accept damage was limited on Pakistans side. You also say that damage was limited on India’s side after Pakistan responded. You are grossly exaggerating when you say Pakistanis response was a ‘miserable failure’ as India wouldn’t have accepted losses and asked for deescalation within hours of that op if it had been. Therefore all square on the ground to ground attacks.

3. This leaves your point about striking ‘deep’ inside Pakistan as India’s big ‘win’. Hardly something to beat your chest about given Pakistans geography relative to India. If India had the same geography as Pakistan it could also have claimed striking ‘deep’ within India.

Therefore as much as u are desperate for it to, point 3 does not somehow make up for point 1. Nowhere near and never will.

Thanks for replying to my what u perceive to be ‘childish’ post. If it’s any consolation, I replied to your post which I see as simply level coping in the struggle to live with the fact that India got yet another caning from a far smaller neighbour with a fraction of the budget.

 

[NationalistPKDude132]

1. India and IAF in particulars humiliation and humbling in the air was epic and is indisputable.

2. India resorted to ground attcks after that failure and u accept damage was limited on Pakistans side. You also say that damage was limited on India’s side after Pakistan responded. You are grossly exaggerating when you say Pakistanis response was a ‘miserable failure’ as India wouldn’t have accepted losses and asked for deescalation within hours of that op if it had been. Therefore all square on the ground to ground attacks.

3. This leaves your point about striking ‘deep’ inside Pakistan as India’s big ‘win’. Hardly something to beat your chest about given Pakistans geography relative to India. If India had the same geography as Pakistan it could also have claimed striking ‘deep’ within India.

Therefore as much as u are desperate for it to, point 3 does not somehow make up for point 1. Nowhere near and never will.

Thanks for replying to my what u perceive to be ‘childish’ post. If it’s any consolation, I replied to your post which I see as simply level coping in the struggle to live with the fact that India got yet another caning from a far smaller neighbour with a fraction of the budget.

We could have hit them worse if we didnt show restraint, imagine if we used Babur

 

[Vkdindian1]

India resorted to ground attcks after that failure and u accept damage was limited on Pakistans side.

It was designed to be limited. Otherwise the missile at Nur Khan could have fallen on GHQ if the intention was to cause real damage. I hope you know the meaning of a strike on GHQ. Or would you count it in terms of just a building destroyed with no one inside?

You have still not understood where Pakistan failed in this conflict.

It failed to strike Indian targets inspite of achieving remarkable success in the Air to Air battle. It couldn’t utilise that edge to carry out precision strikes. Firing rockets in the air aimed towards East was the only achievement.

Hardly something to beat your chest about given Pakistans geography relative to India. If India had the same geography as Pakistan it could also have claimed striking ‘deep’ within India.

Please don’t be a child and grow up. If you had grown up then you would have known that India has many bases and military assets at same distance or lesser distance from the border as yours. No one is asking for a proof of strike at bases near Kolkata.
Your forces tried to hit 26 bases as claimed by the ISPR. And here you are hiding behind geography.

Wouldn’t it have been better not to waste your missiles since they couldn’t do anything? That way you could have said, we didn’t try at all and had we tried we could have done the damage. Right now it is loss of face and claims of -we didn’t fire Babur and better missiles. It means that the assessment of using Fatah-I was a wrong one. Isn’t that a failure?

All square on ground to ground would take place the day you post a proof.
And we all know it ain’t coming.

 

[hydrabadi_arab]

Israel have blocked SATs but videos of smoke and fire keep coming.

It was designed to be limited. Otherwise the missile at Nur Khan could have fallen on GHQ if the intention was to cause real damage. I hope you know the meaning of a strike on GHQ. Or would you count it in terms of just a building destroyed with no one inside?

You have still not understood where Pakistan failed in this conflict.

It failed to strike Indian targets inspite of achieving remarkable success in the Air to Air battle. It couldn’t utilise that edge to carry out precision strikes. Firing rockets in the air aimed towards East was the only achievement.



Please don’t be a child and grow up. If you had grown up then you would have known that India has many bases and military assets at same distance or lesser distance from the border as yours. No one is asking for a proof of strike at bases near Kolkata.
Your forces tried to hit 26 bases as claimed by the ISPR. And here you are hiding behind geography.

Wouldn’t it have been better not to waste your missiles since they couldn’t do anything? That way you could have said, we didn’t try at all and had we tried we could have done the damage. Right now it is loss of face and claims of -we didn’t fire Babur and better missiles. It means that the assessment of using Fatah-I was a wrong one. Isn’t that a failure?

All square on ground to ground would take place the day you post a proof.
And we all know it ain’t coming.

Since you will keep repeating lies.

Here is proof of Uri brigade HQ with dozen Indian soldiers dead. Now don't ask for Maxar images for proof. May more videos on social media.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

On 10th May 26 hits were confirmed by Col Sofia in press conference. Obviously with minimum damage to equipment and personnel but a day later S400 operator was found dead. So S400 radar was also taken out. But this is not a big deal for a country that say number 6-0 doesn't matter, how they went down matter.

 

[Waz]

Israel have blocked SATs but videos of smoke and fire keep coming.


Since you will keep repeating lies.

Here is proof of Uri brigade HQ with dozen Indian soldiers dead. Now don't ask for Maxar images for proof. May more videos on social media.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

On 10th May 26 hits were confirmed by Col Sofia in press conference. Obviously with minimum damage to equipment and personnel but a day later S400 operator was found dead. So S400 radar was also taken out. But this is not a big deal for a country that say number 6-0 doesn't matter, how they went down matter.

I haven't seen any Indian poster explain what happened in that video i.e. the one with a dozen dead Indian soldiers in view and a base in ruins? Was this artillery barrage from the Pakistani army or a missile strike. It looks like a high speed missile strike by the PAF.


What happened here?

 

[najamiqbal]

It was designed to be limited. Otherwise the missile at Nur Khan could have fallen on GHQ if the intention was to cause real damage. I hope you know the meaning of a strike on GHQ. Or would you count it in terms of just a building destroyed with no one inside?

You have still not understood where Pakistan failed in this conflict.

It failed to strike Indian targets inspite of achieving remarkable success in the Air to Air battle. It couldn’t utilise that edge to carry out precision strikes. Firing rockets in the air aimed towards East was the only achievement.



Please don’t be a child and grow up. If you had grown up then you would have known that India has many bases and military assets at same distance or lesser distance from the border as yours. No one is asking for a proof of strike at bases near Kolkata.
Your forces tried to hit 26 bases as claimed by the ISPR. And here you are hiding behind geography.

Wouldn’t it have been better not to waste your missiles since they couldn’t do anything? That way you could have said, we didn’t try at all and had we tried we could have done the damage. Right now it is loss of face and claims of -we didn’t fire Babur and better missiles. It means that the assessment of using Fatah-I was a wrong one. Isn’t that a failure?

All square on ground to ground would take place the day you post a proof.
And we all know it ain’t coming.

Bro, the only thing that failed in 2025 was Indian GPS, missile targeting, media credibility, and basic logic. Let’s recap the 2025 “war” you keep crying about:
Indian media claimed: “We’ve captured Islamabad, dancing on Lahore streets, and shut down Karachi port.”

• Reality: Not a single Pakistani city touched.
• Meanwhile in Delhi: Breaking news showed missile launches using reused Republic TV stock footage from 2019.
• PAF not only intercepted your jets but also shot down six, and guess what? Jet parts with Indian serial numbers were on full display — certified by neutral observers.
• Indian “precision strikes” landed on empty fields near Lahore and Shekhopura. Some did limited damage to the air bases and the runways. Great achievement for a $70B defense budget.
• the legendary Kirana Hills fairy tale, where Gen. G.D. Bakshi claimed India secretly destroyed Pakistan’s nukes in some Bollywood-style covert op. If that’s true, sweetheart, then riddle me this
  Why did India rush to request a ceasefire in the 2025 conflict.
  If our nukes were “already destroyed”, what were you afraid of? Pigeons with payloads?
• Now here you are, writing bedtime fan-fiction about "had we tried, we could've done damage." Bhai, you did try — and you still got humbled. You know what the real "deep strike" was? Watching India’s PR collapse when even international outlets sided with Pakistan’s evidence over Indian TV drama. So stop calling it a “limited conflict.” The only thing limited was your success, your credibility, and your grasp on reality.2025 wasn’t a war. It was a one-sided expose — and you brought the camera crew yourself.
  
  
  

 

[Waz]

Bro, the only thing that failed in 2025 was Indian GPS, missile targeting, media credibility, and basic logic. Let’s recap the 2025 “war” you keep crying about:
Indian media claimed: “We’ve captured Islamabad, dancing on Lahore streets, and shut down Karachi port.”

• Reality: Not a single Pakistani city touched.
• Meanwhile in Delhi: Breaking news showed missile launches using reused Republic TV stock footage from 2019.
• PAF not only intercepted your jets but also shot down six, and guess what? Jet parts with Indian serial numbers were on full display — certified by neutral observers.
• Indian “precision strikes” landed on empty fields near Lahore and Shekhopura. Some did limited damage to the air bases and the runways. Great achievement for a $70B defense budget.
• the legendary Kirana Hills fairy tale, where Gen. G.D. Bakshi claimed India secretly destroyed Pakistan’s nukes in some Bollywood-style covert op. If that’s true, sweetheart, then riddle me this
  Why did India rush to request a ceasefire in the 2025 conflict.
  If our nukes were “already destroyed”, what were you afraid of? Pigeons with payloads?
• Now here you are, writing bedtime fan-fiction about "had we tried, we could've done damage." Bhai, you did try — and you still got humbled. You know what the real "deep strike" was? Watching India’s PR collapse when even international outlets sided with Pakistan’s evidence over Indian TV drama. So stop calling it a “limited conflict.” The only thing limited was your success, your credibility, and your grasp on reality.2025 wasn’t a war. It was a one-sided expose — and you brought the camera crew yourself.
  
  

To be honest there is a silver lining in Indian missiles getting through. It has not accelerated plans massively for the use of supersonic and hypersonic missiles by the forces and in numbers.

 

[SABRE]

I haven't seen any Indian poster explain what happened in that video i.e. the one with a dozen dead Indian soldiers in view and a base in ruins? Was this artillery barrage from the Pakistani army or a missile strike. It looks like a high speed missile strike by the PAF.

View attachment 128149
What happened here?

These are method actors from Akshay Kumar & Sunny Deol movie. Gave up their lives to look real dead bodies.

 

[FarhanSiddiqui]

Zionazis wanted to ethnically cleanse Palestine from 1930s.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies