Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Next engagement will be of exchange of missiles ....next level variety ...longer ranges....may be coastal targets from both sides.

It's better to talk....badley kay charkar mein quom ko mat marwao"
The world has seen the exchange of missiles is no fun. And, it has found no amount of "Israil" can turn Pakistan into another "Palestine". Rather the entire world can have a short visit from Azrail*.....

*The Angel of Death
**Palestine is the product of the Arab nationalism, under the Western Imperialists, to break the Ottoman Enpire. Pakistan is the product of the Two Nation Theory, upon which the Imperialists will be sent to Jahannam as per the Sunnet-i Ialhi.
 
Update:

My source confirm me W.C Abhinondon not only resigned from IAF but also admitted in hospital for psychiatric treatment.

Major cause of his illness is rash behavior specially when someone offer him tea....

And I am not joking.
 
Kash he would have also said it clearly .....because Barkha Dutt is again in TV show ....twisting this statement ....and adding doubts to Indian minds.....

five jets could be of either side or mix of both......lo karlo gal......🤣
He probably would, once the indian ***** have done all their twisting
 
One thing is quite interesting.
It can be seen that PL-15 outranges the meteor(by only a small margin) lets say a J-10C is looking at Rafale contact on the Indian side you can see where it can engage from and perhaps even the JF-17 can engage from.

View attachment 136205But if you look at the overlapping larger circle in this second image from the Indian side, it seems that if on the initial engagements the PAF simply stayed out of the S-400 engagement range at Adampur it can still take pot shots at the Rafale well inside Indian airspace. HOWEVER the PAF claims it was operating closer to the border so the question isnt just for the IAF as to why no Meteors were available but for the S-400 as well.
Why did it not get used if at any point it had PAF aircraft within engagement even though they ridiculously claim this longest SAM kill against an Erieye well beyond the effective Range of the S-400?

View attachment 136206
Because Indians lie as they go and lies never corroborate. I never take anything that comes out of Indians mouths seriously.
 
They do, Indians have been feeding us with military intelligence for decades. They have millions of poor and neglected Muslims.

Pakistan should have a solid plan in place for a one way mission deep inside India. I want drone swarms unleashed in their major cities targeting their civilians.
just the cow belt. Sikhs and Muslims from Cow belt can be used as assets, provided we have built connections
 
No its not ......domestic audience to International audience will take no time.....take this Notam a serious step...

They won't be sit until they do something crazy
That's the byproduct of showing restraint.
 
Update:

My source confirm me W.C Abhinondon not only resigned from IAF but also admitted in hospital for psychiatric treatment.

Major cause of his illness is rash behavior specially when someone offer him tea....

And I am not joking.
maybe its time he should come clean on f16 claims
 
Unsure, but would not be surprised now.

IAF retiring it's last two MIG-21 sqds in a month or so, now fleet looks like

29 Sqds

6 Jaguar
13 SU-30
3 Mirage 2000
2 Radale
3 MIG-29
2 Tejas (non combat capable in reality)

Take out the Tejas, IAF is now looking at 27 effective combat Sqds.

V

16 PAF combat Sqds, 19 sqds if you include CCS.

Now assuming some IAF combat jets have to be stationed by China, let us assume at least 2 wings (4 Combat Sqds)

Then the reality is 23 Combat Sqds v potentially 19 PAF combat Sqds by Sep 2025.

Not only is IAF lagging in technology and training here, it terms of numbers (and i have not even taken into account the 7th May combat losses), IAF is becoming smaller with every passing year
Jaguars are useless, they'll probably lose half of them only during mobilization
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



Well that gets us closer to whom those 5 jets belonged to
 
War seems imminent, and both sides are preparing in their own ways. India wants to establish strong deterrence against any future terror attacks on its soil, while Pakistan wants to impose a significant cost on India for any such "misadventure."

In the midst of all this, the core issue is completely lost—which is, frankly, quite ironic.

In my view, a potential conflict in the near future might actually serve a purpose. It could either give Pakistan the deterrence it seeks against India for a long time, or result in significant material damage that forces it to retreat from its confrontational stance on Kashmir.

Realistically, there is no chance of any change in the status of Kashmir, given the current military capabilities of both countries. So, statements like "Kashmir is the jugular vein of Pakistan" or "We will take back Pakistan Azaad Kashmir" are nothing more than empty rhetoric from both sides.

Which brings me to the real question: if neither side can change the status quo, then why are they even fighting—or preparing to fight?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top