Oscar
Moderator
Why do you assume GHQ babas are the only corrupt ones? Or that PAF only competent?in the previous op we were really saved by PAF which spear-headed the action and set things rolling and in our favor. PAF will always do that.
Question remains on the timid, almost-cowardly cuck behaviour of our GHQ old babas who think too much of the duniya and their accumulated worldly assets, green cards and villas and etc. They truly seem oblivious as to how the world is changing rapidy and that their dreams of western retirements may not materialize given the economic downturns in the west which are a trainwreck level now (the decline in everything), our babas have tunnel vision and still think they're living in the 80's era.
Any losses or failures will really be on the army generals and their timid, cowardly and unwillingness to escalate things.
What concerns me and most of us here is the so-called restraints, and the willingness to bow to any external phonecalls from certain countries. Same with our cowardly politicians who got no balls to escalate or take the challenge. This will be our biggest tribulation
We'll win at the end, but the cost will/may be huge, unfortunately
From a percentage perspective it may astonish you that more PAF officers have engaged in corruption versus PA ones - and as far as competence is concerned there are plenty of PA officers who are both honest and competent - they keep it all together.
The PAF has both more immediate impact on the battlefield than PA and so the level of learning required for a baseline PAF officer is higher than PA so the selection criteria gets to be more selective - but that doesn’t mean there aren’t highly technical PA branches who were involved in May in critical aspects.
The issue is that PA has a much larger “unskilled(which is a misuse of the term)” population of those reliant on guidance for decision making(even though today PAF is heavily micromanaged as well) which is impossible to guarantee even 10-20% are fully trained to exact standards and combat effective under current structures, scale and overall quality of reporting/officers.
I’ll give you an example of competence overruled by corruption - Ive given it here before.
The Mp5 was NEVER supposed to be inducted as a battle rifle or “field” weapon in PA. A vested brass pushed for it - a competent officer evaluated it , laid it out plainly in his report that the bullet is on the ground in less than 400-500 yards which is ridiculous for anything other thsn CQB.
But he was overridden because laad saab had connections with the manufacturer and was getting kickbacks. So you had a disadvantage pushed to troops because of one mans greed. The competent officer eventually retired early and if I recall ended up in overseas for some MNC.
Don’t underestimate good people in PA, just as with PAF or PN.
Now excuse my language
حرامی قوم ہو
نسلی
اب وہ نسل فوج میں جائے یا سیاست میں
جب کوئی حرام کو سوائے اللّٰہ کے سامنے یا اصل میں لوگوں کے سامنے ٹوپی ڈرامہ کرنے کے لئے - برا نا سمجھیں اور سب کے سب مجبوری اے وقت کہ ٹال دیں
پھر جھوٹے حفاظ یا گھمنڈ بیوقوفوں کی تبدیلی مبارک ہو


