Be dazzled
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
lol. He always winsyou should bow down to this creature!
thats the only way of argumentation, he apparently understands!
the have loads of sat. imagery and drone footage!
(thats how, his argument will end!)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lol. He always winsyou should bow down to this creature!
thats the only way of argumentation, he apparently understands!
the have loads of sat. imagery and drone footage!
(thats how, his argument will end!)
Highly possible. Navy assets can remain in shadows more than those of the other forces.You are clueless about PN asset disbursement mate.
You have painted an imaginary situation and declared a winner and a loser.However, this is where IN failed to capitalize due to PAF/PN deterrence and its common sense that losing an aircraft vis-a-vis losing an aircraft carrier or a ship for that matter are two different kinds of losses. PAF's long range missiles and PA's MLRS had already inflicted much damage to India that even sending in drones didn't make a dent in the outcome. An aircraft carrier entering the war zone during a conflict, is a potential game changer. It’s not just a new squadron of strike aircrafts coming from another direction but also a volley of Brahmos from ships. This is a massive failure of Indian military planners.
What about the Indian S400 operator casualties injuries...Highly possible. Navy assets can remain in shadows more than those of the other forces.
Same rule applies to IN assets. Aircraft carrier was just one of them and it’s location is no indication of other vessels. Even if few more were detected, many more can remain undetected and do the damage if called for.
You have painted an imaginary situation and declared a winner and a loser.
May events were a skirmish and both sides had plenty of options to escalate. IN wasn’t used for the same reason.
If escalation really was an aim then India could have fired 200 Brahmos and not less than 50, as was done.
There was definitely a failure but only on 7th May.
As far as tonnage goes, it is your side that has to explain where all the tonnage went. Infcat, it was your planners that were found wanting on all fronts after 7th May. No proof of achieving any damage other than the claim of dropping more tonnage than 1965 war.
While your high value assets were engaged with precision, same can’t be said by your side.
2025 - 1192 = 1300I disagree India is posturing. "India" ( however you define it) has been fighting a generational 1300 year war ever since it lost the 2nd Battle of Tarain (1192 CE).
Here, this is an independent site with world renowned Experts including Indians.With more than half the PN docked at Gwadar, PN had a lot up it’s sleeve while IN with multiple times fleet had nothing.
It is good to be nationalist but being blind in that quest doesn’t fit for a TT.
The claims that PN knew all the activities of IN is counterintuitive because they think that they knew all IN moves and assets.
What if they didn’t know about assets they didn’t direct? And how would they know that they detected each and every asset of IN?
I have read all about it. You can claim the entire IAF if you want. Claiming and claiming with proof are poles apart which a TTA should be able to grasp. I agree on 4 aircraft, but beyond that? A TTA can do better.
A TT making an assessment that IN would move it’s ships to
Eastern seaboard while best assets of PN were docked at Gwadar doesn’t augur well for your title.
Please leave that kind of chest thumping to fanboys and do some real work expected out of a TTA.
Indians live in "feel good" news where they want to believe that PN ran with tails behind their backs.You are clueless about PN asset disbursement mate.
And who told these world renowned publications about detection of IN submarines? I guess they had embedded journalists with PN or PN informed them about their own great success stories.Here, this is an independent site with world renowned Experts including Indians.
And who told these world renowned publications about detection of IN submarines? I guess they had embedded journalists with PN or PN informed them about their own great success stories.
Has IN ever made any such declaration of success? It means either they are incompetent to the core or they keep quiet and go about doing what they are supposed to.
With a fleet of 12 P8Is, they must be darn useless to not detect anything at all or the Pak submarines have gained such high tech means that they remain undetected to any Indian effort.
You might take the option one here, but any serious observer knows the answer to this.
I go back to my initial observation. Which is - many posters have claimed all the success to themselves and all the failures to the other side.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.