Pakistan is getting dry

[hasssanali8998]

So you don't believe Kashmir is Pakistan's jugular vein.

I guess that is a start to a civillozed discussion.

If only your government would agree, we can get the Kashmir and IWT issue sorted once and for all.

u seriously have zero comprehension skills


For god sake think before replying

 

[Blueishere]

Huh ???
When did I ever say that
And how is that relevant tho this discussion
U brought this up and now are asking me about this
Lost in your own pseudo intellectualism ??

I don’t have to believe everything my government says
Ajeeb

his year of researching Pakistan didn’t prepare him for someone with no surma, no turban, no shalwar kameez,( the shalwar above knees) and no taweez.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Master Chief]

Please go ahead and blow up the dams with your CM400..... exploded dams and water released out of it first destroy everything in Pakistan coming its way... from Infrastructure to population it's you who will be the paying price first for such stupidity....

Not to mention Indian retaliation with its missiles will be on the way to meet your dams like tarbela, mangla.....

War and attacking dams cannot be an option.... we should accept loc as permanent border and make peace deal with each other forever.... that's the only option....

CM400 ki language ko jawab Brahmos se mileage....

You don't get to tell us what our options are. We will not be negotiating with you people and your tea seller leader. That window for "negotiation" shut a long time ago.

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

Do not intentionally misrepresent the IWT and its terms on every thread you feel an urge to come and vomit over.

Once again for your benefit:

3 eastern rivers and 3 western rivers.

The sources of ALL 6 rivers, to varying degrees, exist in today's Hindustan AND the disputed territories occupied by Hindustan. The majority of the flood plains of the 6 rivers are split between Pakistan and Hindustan based on their relative utility by either nation.

The treaty is in place to mitigate a harmful and deleterious jurisdiction of Hindustan over ALL 6 river sources (particularly in the context of some sources being in disputed territory, but even notwithstanding that fact). The treaty ensures that United Nations binding resolutions on riparian rights during peacetime and wartime are adhered to by a particular malevolent actor.

Hindustan has no legal, diplomatic, contractual, or defensible basis on which to declare "abeyance". I don't think Hindustanis even understand what the word means or they wouldn't try to use it here.

View attachment 202841

Such treaties do not hold much value.

Today, if India says it is cancelling the treaty, what can the World Bank do at most? Almost nothing.

As I said earlier, such matters mainly depend on the relationship between countries. For example, India and China do not have a similar water-sharing treaty.

Yes, there is the UN Watercourses Convention. If it were to apply, Pakistan would have to provide detailed data, justification, and remediation plans regarding water usage and wastage, since factors such as population, existing use, geography, climate, and economic needs are taken into consideration.

It does not require countries to follow a rigid or one-sided framework and share water blindly. Instead, it emphasizes reasonable and equitable use based on multiple factors.

 

[Master Chief]

Such treaties do not hold much value.

Today, if India says it is cancelling the treaty, what can the World Bank do at most? Almost nothing.

As I said earlier, such matters mainly depend on the relationship between countries. For example, India and China do not have a similar water-sharing treaty.

Yes, there is the UN Watercourses Convention. If it were to apply, Pakistan would have to provide detailed data, justification, and remediation plans regarding water usage and wastage, since factors such as population, existing use, geography, climate, and economic needs are taken into consideration.

It does not require countries to follow a rigid or one-sided framework and share water blindly. Instead, it emphasizes reasonable and equitable use based on multiple factors.

Go to the IWT thread and read the Watercourses Convention extracts posted there. Nobody claimed this Convention dictated terms on water sharing. It is in place to stop an upper riparian nation taking punitive measures against a lower riparian nation in times of conflict.

The IWT was designed to facilitate formal adherence to the these basic principles, since we believed that Baniya qoms can't be trusted otherwise.

We were wrong.

Some nations cannot be trusted even after they sign a legally binding document with the other party.

 

[Jaeger]

u seriously have zero comprehension skills


For god sake think before replying

Is it possible, that our misunderstanding is less due to my comprehension skils and more due to you trying to act ..ohh so cool.

So lets begin with you stop acting like a non chalant idiot and tell us your pov.

 

[Nimble]

You don't get to tell us what our options are. We will not be negotiating with you people and your tea seller leader. That window for "negotiation" shut a long time ago.

I smell too much arrogance in your post...