Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

Sorry, but my questions are still unanswered.
Anyhow, is sane person's thinking a proof that Iran has more missiles than Pakistan.
Also, what's 'huge portion of their military funds' and what does it prove, if any?
Please don't forget to take your medicines.
You are an egoistic fool way beyond your depth here if you are still entertaining the idea that Pakistan would have more missiles than Iran.

Common sense is lost on you, and there is no medicine for such a deficiency, condemned forever to stupidity. My condolences.
 
You are an egoistic fool way beyond your depth here if you are still entertaining the idea that Pakistan would have more missiles than Iran.

Common sense is lost on you, and there is no medicine for such a deficiency, condemned forever to stupidity. My condolences.
Why don't you simply say that you have no evidence to prove your claims. Don't hide behind common sense rhetoric. Hard realities are proved by facts/figures and not by perceptions.
Please take your medicine and a break too.
BTW, my original questions still stand unanswered.
 
Why don't you simply say that you have no evidence to prove your claims. Don't hide behind common sense rhetoric. Hard realities are proved by facts/figures and not by perceptions.
Please take your medicine and a break too.
BTW, my original questions still stand unanswered.

They've got oil, they've got a bigger budget and their entire focus is on missiles. Pakistan not so much. How do you understand this?
 
Why don't you simply say that you have no evidence to prove your claims. Don't hide behind common sense rhetoric. Hard realities are proved by facts/figures and not by perceptions.
Please take your medicine and a break too.
BTW, my original questions still stand unanswered.
If it's true then there must be visible huge missile production facilities, launch sites and tunnels for missile storage sites in Pakistan like Iran. Is there any info of facilities being built to store missiles. Is there any such information available??
 
Iran says it didn't attack diego garcia

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

wtf is OP waffling about
he is iranian btw ( diaspora bt still )
i hope pakistanis dont react this way if we are at war
 
Not a single sane person would argue against a claim about Iran having a larger quantity of missiles. Iranian missiles are its *only* deterrence, and a huge portion of their military funds go into that, where they've built several missile silo bases. Pakistan uses missiles for nuclear delivery only, and it invests more of its limited funds into areas like the air force for strike.

It wasn't until very recently that a rocket force was even established.
Iran invested in quantity of missiles, and not much quality.
Most of their initial waves on Israel were intercepted. Only now they are scoring consistently as Israeli Interceptor are depleted .

However Iranian missiles do nowhere near tge same amount of damage as American airforce does. Because fighter jets can carry a lot more explosives than a missile.

So Pakistani decision to invest in Air force instead of spending all the money on missiles was correct.

If iran had an advanced air force, this conflict they are in, may not have been started. They could have intercepted the initial attack and saved their Ayatola, which they couldn't.
 
Iran invested in quantity of missiles, and not much quality.
Most of their initial waves on Israel were intercepted. Only now they are scoring consistently as Israeli Interceptor are depleted .

However Iranian missiles do nowhere near tge same amount of damage as American airforce does. Because fighter jets can carry a lot more explosives than a missile.

So Pakistani decision to invest in Air force instead of spending all the money on missiles was correct.

If iran had an advanced air force, this conflict they are in, may not have been started. They could have intercepted the initial attack and saved their Ayatola, which they couldn't.
Of course I understand this but the other guy was genuinely trying to argue that Pakistan has more missiles in storage than Iran which is just foolish to anyone with even a little knowledge as you've explained.

I'm not debating about which doctrine is better, I think Pakistan's is better, air force + Rocket Force both
 
O bhai ? Kiya ho gaya ?

Strap a single mortar shell with shaheen 2 and it will reach Diego garcia or even much further.

Thats what iran is doing. Even on Israel they are firing very small warheads, which don't do a lot of damage , per shot .
The cluster munitions they been delivering on their missiles have about 4kg explosive per munition.

So, it's good optics that 80 tiny munitions come out of a single Iranian warhead, and fillingthe Tel Aviv sky, , but if you do the maths, the total explosive delivered isb4 x 80, which is less than 350 kg.

Same goes for their Diego Garcia attempt. Even if the missile had reached, the warhead must be so tiny that it may not have done any more damage than a single RPG .

Pakistani missiles carry much higher explosive power , without a lot more assurance of hitting the target.
Well, I understand your points, bro.

Unfortunately I have no confidence about Pakistan missiles' accuracy. We saw FOUR days last year that there were no responses from Pakistan against India and then India attacked us with hypersonic missiles (Brahmos), we still have no answer for it.

Right now we will work on a new Rocket Force and new latest system. Old missiles (very slow) should be replaced immediately to a bit more faster.

I will see what I believe in during a real war.

Last year already proved it, sorry man.
 
Well, I understand your points, bro.

Unfortunately I have no confidence about Pakistan missiles' accuracy. We saw FOUR days last year that there were no responses from Pakistan against India and then India attacked us with hypersonic missiles (Brahmos), we still have no answer for it.

Right now we will work on a new Rocket Force and new latest system. Old missiles (very slow) should be replaced immediately to a bit more faster.

I will see what I believe in during a real war.

Last year already proved it, sorry man.
That was a political and Administrative matter .
You may remember Rana Sana statements just after India's attack? He said Pakistan won't strike back.
Only when india started attacking Pakistani airbases , tge air cheif showed courage and struck back. Then the army joined in.

The Administrative issue was that all the missiles were under strategic command , and they have a different procedure for strike authorization.

Thats why only artillery rockets the Fateh series were used, and no cruise missiles or traditional Ballistic missiles were used. All were under the nuclear command.

This was fixed with rocket force designation. Now part of the Pakistani Cruise and ballistic missiles arsenal will be available for conventional strikes at a lower level of authorization.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top