Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In shortPlease share it here.
for those who confuse it with cm401:View attachment 77001
Most of them across the border and then some Pk origin types - but there is a base where this came from and it’s knowledge base adapted from up north and sometimes further west.We just have a few people who are a little retarded, who just want to claim everything we have or make is from somewhere else even if it's taken years to develop
If someone wanted to - they could take the real time impact video and calculate the velocity from there - rings mark the metersIn short
Maneuvering warhead at hyper sonic speeds
Damn the accuracy
Never mind that. Israel is tiny. The resources needed to protect larger areas scale up exponentially. India has long borders with us. Lots of ability top attack through less defended vectors.People watching Israeli air defense layers got a very false perception that every country possess such ballistic missile defense shields. Israeli AD layers are built with 100s of billions of dollars and decades of R & D. There are 4 distinctive layers with centralized control. India and Pakistan air defenses will only be effective to some degree against fighter jets. 99% of missiles fired at each other will go without interception.
Level of AD of sub-continent is shooting down own helicopter. Letting each other fighter jets come across borders. Fire at enemy brigade HQs with all the time in the universe. Please don't apply israeli AD scenario at subcontinent.
My guess is it’s still super sonic at least per the impact video. Brahmos is known Mach 2.4-2.8, so judging based on this:If someone wanted to - they could take the real time impact video and calculate the velocity from there - rings mark the meters
The test seem not to have tested seeker as it’s just targeting a point on the ground like any other BM. So that parameter would need to be tested, no?Ive seen Shaheen-I display the same accuracy. There is likely another test warranted to check against a moving maneuvering target but it depends if they have the budget or appetite for it or someone will just say “it works” and move on.
Always depends on who is in charge
Likely moving target has already been tested.This is probably a test for PR and to validate ability of surface ships to carry it.Ive seen Shaheen-I display the same accuracy. There is likely another test warranted to check against a moving maneuvering target but it depends if they have the budget or appetite for it or someone will just say “it works” and move on.
Always depends on who is in charge
I wanted to lolIf someone wanted to - they could take the real time impact video and calculate the velocity from there - rings mark the meters


Angle was petty shallow though. If it was more plunging, then it would be faster. Possibly the difference between land attack and anti-ship mode.I wanted to lol
It move 414 px in one frame, which is 1/30th of a second. The missile is 250 px long. If I assume a length of 7.5m, the missile is moving 12.42 m in 1/30th second, which translates to a speed of ...wait for it....372.6 m/s or Mach 1.1
The unknown here is missile length: if I assume 6 m, then the speed is 0.87 Mach, if I assume 9 m, then the speed is 1.3 Mach.
The video could also be 60 fps (slowed down), in that case the speed would be doubled, but the video looks normal speed.
I think this near Mach 1 number is supported by this picture here which seems to show the shockwave crashing on the ground as the missile hits. The shockwave looks rounded and not sharp as you would have expected for high supersonic.
View attachment 77012
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.