Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

falcon34 said:
HD-1 makes no sense when you have CM400akg with a range of 400km and hypersonic terminal speed.
Bunch of lies
Click to expand...
Pakistan bought 50x of CM400AKG.....2x were used during Op Buyan Ul Marsoos. Those are air launched. HD-1 are ship or land launched.
Both have no link .
 
falcon34 said:
I am comparing a strike vector with a strike vector the target doesn't care if it gets hit by a cruise or ballistic missile
Click to expand...

HD-1 is probably intended for the ARFC to give it a supersonic edge, I think the bigger question should be is it just a one off purchase or was there a tech transfer.
 
Bilal said:
“280 more long-range (120 pieces) and short-range (160 pieces) missiles for S-400 air defence systems”


FE was highlighted in PAF videos, so believable.
Click to expand...

Kinda iffy tbh, some of what the article states sound believable while others are suspect like the super specific Ammo figure for the tanks and SH-15s, also the drones since there hasn't been any rumours of the military acquiring the CH-5.
 
JamD said:
Question: What is the range that ARFC needs to reach out to in order to prevent 95% of Indian attacks?
Answer: What is the strike range of all Indian systems and their numbers? For example, which airbases are viable launch pads for air launched Brahmos? Which Brahmos launch sites are in range of important Pakistani bases? Also consider all weapons that India has in any decent number. I'm sure this kind of analysis would be performed @Panzerkiel
Based on this one would decide a list of targets and then the number of missiles and their ranges needed to neutralize them. If someone was paying me I could do a half decent job with OSINT but this is quite a big task. Maybe AI can do it but who will check AI?lol
Click to expand...
In my eyes and opinion, in the next conflict between India and Pakistan. Pakistan should target India's BrahMos launching pads with high priority. Actually, Pakistan should keep tabs on all of India's BrahMos movements and keep their sites under surveillance to avoid any damage to their own important sites.
Indians have learnt that their small successes come only through BrahMos strikes. If Pakistan neutralises BrahMos, India would lose most of its striking capabilities.
 
Alex said:
In my eyes and opinion, in the next conflict between India and Pakistan. Pakistan should target India's BrahMos launching pads with high priority. Actually, Pakistan should keep tabs on all of India's BrahMos movements and keep their sites under surveillance to avoid any damage to their own important sites.
Indians have learnt that their small successes come only through BrahMos strikes. If Pakistan neutralises BrahMos, India would lose most of its striking capabilities.
Click to expand...
Then india would result to its conventional ballisitc options or land attack subsonic cruise missiles.
 
Alex said:
In my eyes and opinion, in the next conflict between India and Pakistan. Pakistan should target India's BrahMos launching pads with high priority. Actually, Pakistan should keep tabs on all of India's BrahMos movements and keep their sites under surveillance to avoid any damage to their own important sites.
Indians have learnt that their small successes come only through BrahMos strikes. If Pakistan neutralises BrahMos, India would lose most of its striking capabilities.
Click to expand...
Im gonna make a video on brahmos storage and operating sites soon..
 
kimjongun said:
Then india would result to its conventional ballisitc options or land attack subsonic cruise missiles.
Click to expand...
Sure, it could, but I think they would be easier to deal with by Pakistan.
One thing is certain now, looking at the recent wars. The next war between India and Pakistan would mostly be fought in the air. It is not going to be huge tanks or massive army troop attacks.
Because such attacks would be sitting ducks and could be annihilated by the enemy with superior air assets.
The next war would be with jets, drones, missiles, EW, satellite monitoring and guidance, etc.
So every army should prepare to defend itself from these dangers; the Pakistani army is not an exception.
Looking at some of the news, Pakistan's army is already working towards this aim.
 
kimjongun said:
Im gonna make a video on brahmos storage and operating sites soon..
Click to expand...
That is good; I hope the Pakistani military have the knowledge you have, and probably better than you do.
That's why I say that not only knowing the location but also keeping an eye on their movement so they know at any given time where those assets are located.
 
Bilal said:
“280 more long-range (120 pieces) and short-range (160 pieces) missiles for S-400 air defence systems”


FE was highlighted in PAF videos, so believable.
Click to expand...
That's good planning by Pakistan. The second biggest danger after "BraHamos" is S 400 from India. To neutralise these two dangers should be, and by the evidence is, the biggest priority of Pakistan's army.
 
( May be completely wrong but would like to kmow the views of the members on this thread . )

A grim portent ! :
Strategic think tanks in India have considered the possibility of a single massive decapitating nuclear strike on Pakistan with hundreds of warheads .
From the Indian perspective based on the May 2025 conflict experience the operation appears feasible with no major consequences for India. It will be a "one way " street.
The success of this potential strike is ensured by the weaknesses exposed during the May 2025 conflict :

  • Pakistan has limited and ineffective anti-missile defenses Most Brahmos missiles were not intercepted and a swarm of nuclear tipped missiles will wreak complete devastation.
  • Pakistan has limited and ineffective missile attack warning systems. Pakistan has no effective missile launch detection, tracking and warning system in place. Neither the impending attacks on the mosques and schools on May 6th-7th nor the attacks on the air bases on May 9th-10th were detected until the actual impacts. So the retaliatory "launch on detect " option appears unrealistic.
  • Pakistan has no nuclear attack proof hardened command and control center with the top military and civilian leadership still residing and operating out of home offices in colonial legacy style sprawling bungalows. Even the GHQ buildings are normal commercial buildings that can be taken out by conventional missiles alone.
  • Pakistan has no camouflage, masking, or cover capability that conceals the whereabouts of the critical decision making centers, 100% of Pakistani territory is under enemy satellite high resolution optical surveillance. This was evident during the release of high resolution pictures of missile impacts on Pakistani air bases,
  • Electronic surveillance, There is a strong possibility that communications in Pakistan are compromised and the whereabouts of the top military and civilian leadership are known and tracked by the enemy. Media appearances on live television easily give away the locations of top military and civilian personnel
  • Civil defense: There is no evidence of any civil defense procedures such as safe shelters, bunkers that the top military or civilian leadership can retreat to . There has never been any fire drill or missile warning exercise of the National Assembly or Senate while in session and one strike could decapitate the leadership. Worse there is no back up chain of command even if there are survivors after the nuclear attack.
  • Pakistan has no backup airborne command and control systems such as the "doomsday jets " that are used by the USA and Russia. In any case the warning time even if available, is too short for any sort of airborne C3 platform to take off.
 
wondering if couple of these things detonate .. what will be the effect on atmosphere ... will region see the day again... or will it be a long night
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 2, guests: 2)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top